RCE Foto

(i) On JuzaPhoto, please disable adblockers (let's see why!)






Login LogoutJoin JuzaPhoto!
JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).

By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you have read your options regarding cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.


OK, I confirm


You can change in every moment your cookies preferences from the page Cookie Preferences, that can be reached from every page of the website with the link that you find at the bottom of the page; you can also set your preferences directly here

Accept CookiesCustomizeRefuse Cookies



Fab10x
www.juzaphoto.com/p/Fab10x



Reviews of cameras, lenses, tripods, heads and other accessories written by Fab10x


Microsoft Translator  The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator.

nikon_af70-210f4Nikon AF 70-210mm f/4

Pros: blurry, sharpening, lampshed

Cons: old generation engine,size.

Opinion: Here we are, well after so much this lens is also enthused to be part of the kit!!!! From the first shots I can only say: finally!!!! lens with excellent yield, we leave out dimensions, shapes, weight, balance to be mounted, etc.. and let's get down to business. What images do you give? In my humble opinion really beautiful! For now I have only used it on DX with a glorious D90, I still have to do the tests on FX nikon D810.ma I can already say that pairing with the D90 from excellent results. Blurred exactly where you want it, unique details already at f4.5 / f5 , construction made in japan impeccable. The engine (at least of my model) is not noisy and the AF is fast, also tried on moving and tine subjects and very well hooked the subject. used on DX is a great canvas on FX is definitely more exploitable. Minimum good focus distance. I still have to test it with little light but during the day even without a lampshed I got excellent contrasted photos and defined It I consider it a high level optics. I found mine on the bay at less than 100 cafes and it's in showcase condition (I'm picky about this..). recommended if the dimenaioni do not interest and you want a level optics with little expense

sent on May 04, 2021


nikon_d800Nikon D800

Pros: Body Pro,color yield, battery life

Cons: High iso hold, white balance

Opinion: I finally bought this gorgeous car for a couple of months with only 8000 shots. I come from (in order) D200,D7000,D700,D300S,D7100. and in the kit I also have a D90 that will not leave me easily... I am not a professional photographer but I allow myself to write my impressions because now some Nikon I know and I would like to give my opinion to those who want to buy one. Well the high iso estate is the only aspect that really disappointed me (at night lamplights of streetlights with the 50 1.8 max 2000 iso... more you don't see ).really I expected more. I had the D700 with which I could take pictures at 4000 iso without any particular disturbance. I think it's because of the super mgpx. Too bad. Another aspect that they lose but for me a little negative is the automatic white balance. Especially with the setting sun you have to intervene manually otherwise something obscene comes out... I have to make a few attempts before finding the right combination, luck that has an infinity of choice in the settings The rest? It's a wonder to me! I do not take sports photos and the gust interests me little (however I have the battery grip and with this the gust so it's great ). The colors then, are really fantastic with much and little light, spectacular details. You can enlarge a lot without losing nulla.il machine body with the pro key position then it's spectacular. Valid display and beautiful sturdy construction. I highly recommend the purchase!!!!

sent on August 27, 2019


nikon_50_f1-8dNikon AF 50mm f/1.8 D

Pros: Super Compact, sharpness, very light, aperture ring

Cons: Construction/materials, non-motorized

Opinion: After owning for almost a year the Yongnuo 50 today I have in the kit this optics and I could give you an idea of what the differences are. There are already many reviews on this lens that say everything and more, so I thought I would post more than anything else a comparison with the China version immediately with the prices (however low), the Yongnuo you could find it even at €70 New! The Nikon used becomes difficult to find it at less than €80. Construction: Externally so-so, I would say a dead heat if not even... Yong, for the quality of the lenses probably Nikon. AF: Yongnuo is motorized, Nikon No, they are still both fast Size: This type of lens is compact and light by nature.... There is little to add Blurry: The Nikon is really "important" and maybe even a little difficult to size exactly what you want, but maybe that is what you wish.. Bokeh Effect: Step up with the blur of course, so Nikon wins but Yongnuo is not at all to underestimate Brightness: excellent in Nikon, very good for Yongnuo, but depends very much on the situation, the decrease in brightness seems to me that Nikon is better Sharpness: Almost draw a good point in favor (for me) This model is the aperture ring that might be fine for some "alternative" photos like no-contact extensions, reversing rings and similar things. I hope this review can be helpful

sent on March 27, 2019


nikon_18-70dxNikon AF-S DX 18-70mm f/3.5-4.5 G ED

Pros: Construction, compact size, good focal length

Cons: VR Absence, Only for DX

Opinion: I recently got hold of this lens, a little by accident and I took the opportunity to replace a 18-55 that I have practically never used (perhaps for the focal length for me very limited). Leaving Dicenco I was satisfied with the construction, metal attachment, right weight, nice bezel. My specimen is in really perfect condition and seems to be working properly, the AF is pleasantly reactive, I tried quelch photo both in outdoor and in closed places, but Counque bright. I'D say he's behaving well!!! It seemed to Me that the best results are obtained starting from F6, which is the conseghuenza that in situations not bright you have to help from the ISO and then you go to compromise... To date There are specimens from 70/80 € and personally it seems a great purchase if found under €100. A natural comparison is born (as already written..) with the 18-55, between the two the 18-70 comes out with a little head high on all fronts, greater focal length, aperture opening, construction, ridiculously AF. Recommend in relation to the price

sent on March 27, 2019


nikon_d7000Nikon D7000

Pros: Image quality, double splot memory, motorized, tropicalised, weight

Cons: Arrangements ISO command, Af points kinda Central

Opinion: I come from a fantastic D200 and here on the D7000 the many differences are felt quite a lot. To begin the ISO seal, not exceptional compared to newer machines or FF but still good, I would say that up to 1600 even with little light the yield is very good, up to 2000 with a little bit of PP you pull out photos of excellent standard. You can push up to 3200 or more but you should not be prorpio in the dark and claim too much. The 16 mpx about are more than adequate, you can print an A3 with perfect definition, but also with excellent results, and in addition the files do not weigh very much... maybe more mpx do not serve a lot if not to crop a little pushed. Compared to the d200 I come from I'm not enthusiastic about the arrangements of the controls, I preferred the body of the d200, here you have to enter more often in the menu to intervene on adjustments that are made quite frequently, but this is subjective, for those who came from A D3000/3100 etc. (single ring) would find everything in its place.. Double ring confirmed useful! The 39 AF points are not bad at all, only that I would have preferred them a little less centered on the sides. The double display is always very comfortable, I would say that I will never buy a car without the top disply, too bad that in this we's no longer the light meter in the upper. The screen is big enough and good quality fantastic viewfinder, motorization that allows you an infinity of optics for all pockets, video function (use rarely but there), possibility to adjust the photos a little directly from the machine, possibility of Make adjustments to cope with possible defects of the installed optics. Overall is a camera that still today (it is not that it is so old) is really great, outclasses to the big any entry level. As APS-C can be considered high level, for a further tangible step I would pass directly to FF. Bought with a large number of shots at a price between 300/350 euro is to be considered an excellent purchase. I hope this review of mine can be utlile

sent on July 03, 2018


yongnuo_ef50_f1-8Yongnuo EF YN 50mm f/1.8

Pros: Price, brightness, weight

Cons: Slightly noisy

Opinion: I find this objective a valid lens. At a price less than 100 euros it is impossible to ask for more. Used is located between 60 and 80 euros, better to find one with Italian guarantee. I have handled different lenses and as materials can not be compared to alternatives that exceed 300/400 euros... Overall the metal attack (Nikon) and plastics in general do not They look worse than a Nikon equivalent (50 1.8 g tested for a month). The AF is very fast and precise (also depends on the machine..) It also has the great advantage of being able to match both a-PSC and Full Frame, not bad! At the level of distortion and vignetting I have not found anything so criticizable or not fixable easily with starting settings or PP. For those looking for the blurry is valuable, good for street and when the light starts to fall. I recommend it

sent on July 03, 2018


nikon_d200Nikon D200

Pros: Build quality, arrangements controls, intuitive, motorized, dual display, double ring

Cons: To date high ISO, 10 MP maximum resolution, no Live View

Opinion: I recently gave up my first D200, after a year of intensive use I would like to leave my opinion. I consider it a machine built as it should be! Really sturdy and quality, it immediately gives you confidence with all the monads in the right place, without having to go every moment in the menu to find the most common commands. Still today it has quality characteristics (shutter speed, flash synchro, n ° overlapping frames etc...) in the cons does not support the "dark", prohibited to climb more than 600 Iso or little more when the light is short, in fairly clear conditions you can also get to 1200 if it was needed... The resolution for if it is not even so bad, maybe avoid crop exaggerated the 11 AF points are (in my opinion) excellent and well distributed, then the Penta prism is a pleasure.... On the basis you do not find it for sure... The machine has its weight but with important optics it becomes very well balanced. __ Last:-Why post a review today of a machine so dated? Because to start is tremendously better than an economic entry-level, it still lies with a reasonable number of shots at a good price (110-160 euros), therefore I would highly recommend it to those who want to start in this beautiful world

sent on June 29, 2018




 ^

JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.

Mobile Version - juza.ea@gmail.com - Terms of use and Privacy - Cookie Preferences - P. IVA 01501900334 - REA 167997- PEC juzaphoto@pec.it

May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me