|
| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
Facip www.juzaphoto.com/p/Facip  |
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator. | Canon 1DX Mark II Pros: operating speed, extended buffer, and AF sensor quality (dynamic range) Cons: None of relief. I would have preferred the adoption of the double CFast slot. Opinion: I have the 1DX II by the end of April (it was one of the first to be delivered) and I joined the 1DX. So, my opinion is related to both the 1DXII as such, which in comparison to the previous 1DX.rnSostanzialmente, as was to be expected, the 1DXII has improved across the already complete and reliable 1DX. In some aspects of the improvements are marginal (+2 megapixels, noise at high ISO), in other substantive (dynamic range, AF, operating speed, video industry, Metering) .rnAF the AF system, while maintaining the previous 61 points, definitely improved. I am not referring only to all the hot spots even with optical f8 (substantially optical with multipliers), but in the ability to operate in low light conditions and the subject tracking system moving quickly. Returning to optical multiplied the use of 2X performance to remember the use of 1.4x with 1DX: fast to keep up with the subject even where the 1DX continues to make forward-indietro.rnVELOCITA ': It took 4 Series 1 (1DIII , 1DIV, and 1DX 1DXII) but finally the buffer (thanks to the CFast memory) is adequate to burst 14 fps (+2 compared to 1DX) and 16 fps with AF locked (+ 2 on 1DX). Prolonged bursts of more than 15 seconds have no hesitation or slowdowns. Even when the buffer is full in a few seconds you free. I dared to abandoning altogether CFlash.rnESPOSIMETRO: The exposure is even more precise and reliable. I report in this section that the white balance is also consistent with artificiali.rnVIDEO light sources: Almost a revolution than the 1DX for both the frame rate for the 4K format (from which you can extract frames in jpeg). Using just the video function and I have not done accurati.rnrnDopo test all these compliments to the question: is it worth changing the 1DX with 1DX II the answer is .... it depends! If you exploit the capabilities of 1DXII (with particular reference to the FPS speed AF for moving subjects, video, etc ...) the answer is decisamente SI. In certain situations the difference, at least perceived, is remarkable. If you prefer the landscapes and portraits, though gusts to prolonged 14fps not interest you .... you'll have to evaluate your choice more carefully (if the expenditure is an investment for you .... if it is not a problem, take the no 1DXII think about it) .rnrnNon quote more usual discussion: weight and size. We are talking about a number 1 and as such built to last, with BG integrated, capacious battery, large and ergonomic controls the rear sticks are larger and improved grip) .rnrnUltimo: 1DX II vs D5. Only the 1Dx II and D5 are comparable. All other products are missing out on a comparative who sees these two excel templates to speed and robustness. I have not tried the D5. My feeling, to'm ready to change my mind, is that these are two such comprehensive and high-performance reflex not to be the element of choice between Canon and Nikon. Choose safely such as optical, flash system, assistance, etc .... prefer and therefore will come & agravis; the choice between 1DXII and D5. sent on June 28, 2016 |
 | Canon EF 500mm f/4 L IS II USM Pros: Optical quality, AF, 4-stop stabilizer, materials / strength, weight. Cons: Size and weight. Opinion: I start with the "weight" that I mentioned is among the qualities that between defects. Why? It 's the lightest 500 ever built by Canon and you could not do better. However, for those who have never had a super-telephoto weight can be a problem. Even in air travel is used wisely to avoid problems with the hand luggage. RNLA build quality is excellent and the AF is fast and accurate even with multipliers series III.rnMi expected IQ (image quality) high, but I was still pleasantly impressed. At least on the 1DX your chances of getting pushed while maintaining very high quality crop is large (greater than the other lenses that I used). RnRitengo similar quality that is common to all new and super-tele.rnConsiglio surely this ottica.rnIl current price is about 9,000 , 00 Euro (depends on the options of purchase). mI direct competitors are the 400 2.8 II and zooming 200-400 F4 with 1.4 integrated. sent on May 29, 2013 |
 | Canon 1DX Pros: AF module, speed sensor, the quality of the files, ISO range, ergonomics, AF even at F8 Cons: It 'an SLR without the really true defects. Very balanced in all specifications. rnQualcuno might find overly structured menu options and AF in particular, but then if you want a lot of options in some way will set you need. It 'a professional camera and it is normal to be "complex". Opinion: B. I am not referring only to the obvious difference in fps from 6 to 12-14. In 1DX AF is more responsive and AI-Servo tracking is another category. Also reduced the "lag" button is well percepibile.rnUn 'other thing I noticed: the 5DIII up to 6 fps the 1dx up to 12 (14). However, the burst of 5DIII is more influenced by some settings (high ISO, noise reduction, optimization of lights, etc ...) than the 1DX. Thus, the field of the difference fps is more pronounced than in mere data (where it is anyway already the double!). RnSe, instead, a reflex with good reactivity is sufficient for you, and do not need the structure to be "war" of 1DX, the 5DIII is definitely an excellent alternative, as the quality of the files is very similar (I have not done comparative tests on recoveries dark areas - clear where in the past the series 1 have always had a bit more). rn sent on October 18, 2012 |
 | Canon 5D Mark III Pros: Materials and robustness, operational speed, AF module, ergonomics and advanced features, image quality RAW and jpeg quality, high ISO management, recovery or over-exposed shadow areas. Cons: Hard to find fault. Already the previous 5DII was excellent. Canon did not want to upset the project, but it has improved throughout, giving their best in those aspects where the 5DII had received criticism. Now that the 18 megapixel cameras are the basis and some go far beyond, I do not know whether to call a defect: RAW files are quite heavy to be processed if you have a PC dated (although the latest versions of Photoshop CS6 and 4 LR have been optimized and are faster). I do not like the double slot: I would rather have two slots for CF (maybe it will appeal to those who use reflex of the lower segment or compact). Opinion: I'm very happy 5DIII I'm enjoying every day. The AF module and the operating speed are considerable, while the files are workable and very detailed. It seems to have in my hands a 7D even better, but with the quality of the 5DII files (actually even better because in ISO 12800 and ISO 25600 gives the 5DIII files usable and very workable). In fact, Canon has made to square the circle. The price, at first a little high, is declining. In any case, is money well spent. If you do not want to disturb the heavier and more robust series 1, hard to find better house in Canon. As the pure speed and responsiveness 1DIV is preferable. I know it's a comparison that is the time that is, but since I was undecided until the last if the 5DIII I could do without the 1DIV, I said, NO! Are complementary if you want, but do not alternatives (although it remains 5DIII excellent in all). AF as mentioned is excellent. Best of 1DIV? I do not know .... because by the time it davveror difficult that these two cameras are wrong. Perhaps if you can move a criticism, or rather make a comment, the AF 5DIII has many settings and how to use them, but personally in the end all are necessary. Maybe you could simplify. But I still do not have a sufficient command of the product to give a final opinion. For birds and / or distant subjects personally feel the lack of AF to f8 (I use the 400 5.6) and crop factor in the room .... but Canon has taken this route for the 1DX (even worse because the 1DX less megapixels). Sin. Another reason for complementariettà with 1DIV. When will a 7D with a high quality of files, will be a companion more "economical" than 1DIV. sent on April 30, 2012 |
 | Canon EF 24-105mm f/4 L IS USM Pros: Construction, colors, sharpness, stabilizer, constant aperture Cons: flare, vignetting on FF, slight distortion to 24 Opinion: The 24-105 IS is definitely a good optics. An excellent all-rounder on FF (not on APS-C where advice EF-S lenses that allow you to have 24 mm actual). The build quality is very good and the AF accurately and quickly. Suffers enough flare. Over time has been improved (at least what I currently comparing with the previous year). For me it is a lens must. In fact, I sold it for the first time (I went from FF to APS-H) ... and then buy it. In these focal lens seems to be the best all-rounder canon. The 24-70 has an optical quality slightly better, but with a lower excursion. In addition, a handyman prefer opening f4 and stabilizer (but it is a matter of taste and need). I recommend it on FF. sent on December 18, 2011 |
 | Canon EF 70-200mm f/2.8 L IS II USM Pros: Optical quality, color, sharpness, stabilizer, construction. Cons: Weight and price. Opinion: This lens should be part of any kit Canon. Rarely a product is free of defects, and this is one of those cases. The optical quality is excellent at all apertures, without decay particles at the edges. The construction is great, and zooming in provides a great balance. The stabilization system is one of the best I've ever tried: fast (a few milliseconds of bedding), quiet (almost inaudible) and effective. Also the AF is fast and accurate. I do not have defects found! It is very light but is built with premium materials and a zoom with constant aperture to 2.8. Canon produces four zoom like 70-200. They differ in the opening f4 or f2.8 and for the presence or absence of the stabilizer. I actually used all four and all have excellent quality. But if you can pretend everything: 2.8 the stabilizer. You will not regret. sent on December 18, 2011 |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
