|
| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
Gattoq www.juzaphoto.com/p/Gattoq  |
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator. | Tamron SP 70-200mm f/2.8 Di LD Pros: Practical, punchy Cons: Perhaps the lack of the stabilizer (present instead in the next model) Opinion: What can I say.. I had the "stabilized" brother in repair and I immediately looked for a replacement for some upcoming shooting. I found this model at a really bargain price (and probably those who sold it used it very little); I must say that it surprised me, it is really practical and I also used manual focus, selectable from the ring itself (without going looking for who knows what button): Maybe it's because I'm back in the days of analog cameras and lenses but I found it really good. Repaired the official 70-200 this one I certainly did not resell it indeed it willingly remains in the lens park. The results are very good, of course you have to keep in mind that you can run into the error of micro-blur. fortunately the hand is still quite steady (even if I use the f4 as a maximum aperture) sent on January 18, 2026 |
 | Sigma 18-200mm f/3.5-6.3 DC OS HSM Pros: Robust, practical, focal range Cons: What can be expected from this perspective? The focus is more on the scene shot than on the "goodness" of the lens. Opinion: Let's say that for the cost it is available it is a happy optic for recreational use, certainly for amateur use. It can be a wild card on an aps-c on the road where it is important to know how to use the focal lengths included and focus on the scenes shot. With a little handle and knowing how to dribble the defects, you can bring home good results sent on January 18, 2026 |
 | Canon EF 24-105mm f/3.5-5.6 IS STM Pros: Practicality, more than good definition of images, cost. Cons: Obviously the opening jump, after all, is not the L series. A slight barrel game in extension (as already mentioned in the other reviews) Opinion: Despite the opening leap that must be taken into account in the recovery, it can be said that the results obtained are decidedly good. I use it in portraits and only rarely in stills (I have other dedicated lenses). On FF it is a great all-rounder. For those like me who have short finances I think it is a good alternative to its older brother L, as a performance of course. sent on January 18, 2026 |
 | Canon 550D Pros: practical, light, immediate Cons: maybe a little small for my hands, ISO settings range Opinion: It is a wild card to carry with you with an all-rounder (such as 24/70 EF or an 18/200 or similar); Lightweight, practical, long-lasting batteries. In my opinion better than the latest entry level. It is at its best with good optics. I think it has the sensor of the larger aps-c 7D and it comes out with some very good images. For those with large hands it is not very comfortable ... But you get used to everything. I use it as a 3rd body (after the 5D III and the 6D), working at rather high sensitivities (1600-4000); The files of the 550 obviously suffer from a bit of noise but everything can be remedied with post production. I'm selling it because I'd like to switch to the 7D... But now it's hard to sell "classic" SLRs. sent on March 07, 2024 |
 | Canon Powershot G9 Pros: Compactness, ergonomics, convenience of commands, RAW files - JPG Cons: medium-high iso noise, non-extended wide-angle (resolved in later versions), slow storage of files Opinion: Purchased also used by virtue of the more suitable ergonomics compared to the following models: I use it mainly on the road (cycle) and in those disengaged situations in which I weigh i carry the reflex. I find it very practical, like an automatic compact but with the same interventions as a slad. Unfortunately in low light conditions the generated files contain a lot of noise, much more than you would expect (even compared to a normal Reflex) but it is predictable even if it leaves quite a bit undecided. Battery consumption is normal but it is better to have a spare charge. sent on November 04, 2019 |
 | Canon PowerShot G7 Pros: Good ergonomics, great jpg files, good autonomy, great display... practicality overall Cons: non-angle optics (resolved by the G10 mod), no RAW file (resolved by the G9 mod) Opinion: I used it in parallel with the reflex; it is quite practical because it is a compact with the characteristics of a reflex (practice M mode and anyway where you can change the time/diaphragm parameters > Av and TV). Convenient in travel (in my case cyclejourney) when a reflex could be cumbersome and in any case on occasions in there are no particular optical risks. sent on September 21, 2019 |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
