The Canon EF 24-105mm f/3.5-5.6 IS STM is a standard lens for FF and APS-C, manufactured from 2014. The focus is done by Lens AF motor (Stepper Motor), it has image stabilization. The average price, when it has been added to the JuzaPhoto database, is 402 €;
46 users have given it an average vote of 9.7 out of 10.
This lens is available with the following mounts:
Canon EF: this lens is compatible with reflex fullframe and APS-C Canon EF.
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments, join discussions and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 187000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.
Pros:price, sharpness, AF, stabilization, lightness, compactness
Cons:none for the price!
Opinion:It costs less than an APSC entry level, but it's a 4.5x zoom lens per full frame... it is dark, of course, but it is largely compensated by the fact that it is always clear, with every focal point and every diaphragm. The distortions do not interest me because they are correctable in posts, and disappear in the face of the extreme convenience of the object being purchased. If we add a precise and silent AF, an always effective stabilizer and weights and clutter all in all (for a real all-rounder zoom lens for FF) reduced, the vote can only be 10: the construction, see above, is the daughter of the price, and it has been seen a lot of pegg me in lenses of much other price range and optical quality. Indispensable to enter the FF world without fainting!
Pros:Sharp already to TA, closing of a stop even better, economical both new and used, excellent focal excursion on FF, IS, block excursion, solid construction apart....
Cons:Game of the tube of the front (although it seems not to invalidate the optical yield) and the blessed lens hood that purchases however compatible to a few euros (the original on Amazon is now under 30 euros but is overpaid the same)
Opinion:I agree with what has already been stated with those who preceded me that enhance their praises and flaws (few fortunately). While accustomed to the sharp and contrasty photos of the Tamron USD SP 24-70 f/2.8 USD that I have now for a few years and I appreciated his notes optical quality, but that sometimes on the tele side I considered a short Pelino, I bought this cheap little gem , even if I thought it could be quite dark, to be accompanied by what I possess for light outputs with only one optic and at most a flash. At the first mounting on both 6d and 80d already after the first shots I realized it was the perfect optics I was looking for, although with APS-c it often takes up either the Samyang 8mm or the Canon 17-40 because of the multiplication factor that starts the lower focal by just over 35m M, but on the other hand I have a tele from 168mm that does not hurt. Sharp enough not to make you regret to leave at home more demanding optics for weight and footprint, discreet in position 24mm provided you do not mount the hood, this handyman covers the overwhelming need of the focal length that most use on FF. The minimum focusing distance of only 40 cm allows you to get close to the subject to be photographed (does not replace the 100mm macro, but is quite comfortable the same), the STM engine is virtually noiseless, as well as the stabilizer. The only drawback is the frontal a little dancer (frequent problem in non-series lenses as well as the emblazoned EFS 17-55 f/2.8 IS) to which I am not accustomed, but otherwise absolutely nothing to recriminate in relation to the price and optical quality of the lens. Highly recommended, rated 9.5
Opinion:Unbeatable value for a handyman, and I said almost everything. The files are indistinguishable from those of the Big Brother, at 24mm it is perhaps better than the Big Brother L and it is also a brighter pelino. The construction is not even remotely comparable to the L series, we warn games on the extended part to 105mm. You buy new at 300 euros and used to just over 200 and it's not really the case to be picky. Recommended to all those who use little/very little this type of zoom, for an intensive professional use better to buy a L series.
Opinion:I own both the 24-105 STM and the 24-70/4 L is and in my opinion the main differences are precisely in the montage: the lens L has no "games" of any kind while in the STM the part that escapes to 105mm "dances" a little. Nothing worrying but the feeling is that of an imperfect assembly or simply less accurate. Also missing the gasket on the bayonet and, as noted by others, the lens hood should be bought apart... From the optical point of view, however, nothing to say, especially on the FF of 6d. In my way of seeing the shots are indistinguishable compared to those obtained with more emblazoned optics. Very fast focus and virtually noise-free stabilizer.
Pros:Quality appropriate to the cost, when without faults.
Cons:White dot inside the back lens
Opinion:I always thought that the canon does not know how to do the 24-105 and I talk about all, old and new, I always preferred the Sigma 24-105 4.0 Art to Canon, high speech are the 24-70 canon unrivaled. I purchased the 24-105 STM for my daughter, Novo in store in Lugano at €300 now I am with on white dot in the rear lens, although irrelevant in the images, the thing is very annoying.
The sample photos are selected automatically between all photos posted by JuzaPhoto members, using the camera and the lens selected in the techs. If you find evident errors (e.g. photos taken with cameras and lenses that are not available yet), you can contribute to improve the page by sending a private message to the user that has entered incorrect values in the photo caption.