|
| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
Testarossa57 www.juzaphoto.com/p/Testarossa57  |
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator. | Sony FE 200-600mm f/5.6-6.3 G OSS Pros: Sharpness , internal zoom , maf , weight for lens type Cons: I can't find any Opinion: With this lens Sony did bingo . Exceptional sharpness and very performing maf . Very balanced for the internal zoom that makes this lens very usable even freehand. I use it on A7 III and A6400 that with the battery grip is balanced, on aps-c it becomes a 900 and if the light is good it churns out very nice and clean rows. I also find the price very good, in my opinion it is worth much more, good Sony that with this operation has managed to bring home many fans of nature photos. Absolutely recommended sent on October 30, 2021 |
 | Sigma 70mm f/2.8 DG Macro Art Pros: Exceptional sharpness, delicious blurry, button to differentiate the MAF, tropicalized. Cons: Autofocus a bit slow Opinion: I just got it, but I've already fallen in love with it. The sharpness is great and the blurry is very, very nice. Very useful keys to differentiate the MAF. It is not very light, but it is held very well and by a sense of robustness and is tropicalized. Autofocus is sometimes slow, but I think in a macro it is quite common and in any case in the most pushed photos you use manual MAF. Once again good Sigma, vote 10 sent on March 25, 2021 |
 | Tamron 28-200mm f/2.8-5.6 Di III RXD Pros: Light, crisp, very versatile, 2.8 to 28 Cons: 2.8 only to 28 Opinion: I just took it and it immediately hit me positively. I use it on the A7 III and with a range of 28-200 allows you to go out with a single lens. It is not stabilized, but so is the machine, very light with excellent sharpness at all focal points. If it serves at 28 is 2.8 and on some occasions it can come in handy. For the moment I am very satisfied, he replaced the 24-70 Vario Tessar, I did it because I love long focals. A great lens that I absolutely feel like recommending. sent on March 06, 2021 |
 | Sigma 100-400mm f/5-6.3 DG DN OS C Pros: Light, very sharp, good MAF, good construction Cons: The trepidal ring is missing, but I use it freehand so it doesn't cause me any problems Opinion: I have just taken it and use it on the A7 III and I am very pleased with it. Excellent sharpness even at full opening and very responsive the MAF, I use it for naturalistic photos and these parameters are fundamental. The tests I have done have yielded excellent results, regarding stabilization in symbiosis with the Sony sensor so often criticized, I can say that I took 400 focal shots with 1/40 without micro moves and I consider it a very good result. It is not tropicalized, but the construction is very good and from a sense of solidity. Finally I want to highlight the really remarkable value for money, certainly the 100-400 Sony will have something more, but it costs more than double , so good Sigma another great lens. sent on January 20, 2021 |
 | Panasonic Leica 100-400mm f/4.0-6.3 ASPH OIS Pros: Sharpness, weight, stabilizer, blurred Cons: The zoom dial a little hard Opinion: I have owned it for almost a year and a half now and I feel like doing a verified review . The optical quality is great, great sharpness, loses something at 400 but recoverable by closing the diaphragm by a stop. I use it on Olympus OM D E M1 II and behaves very well , also excellent focus also to chase and stabilization. It returns fabulous bluy, very creamy and suggestive, and even the construction is great, the only thing is the a little hard zooming but it doesn't seem like a big deal. All this with an avifauna aviauna atlife that reaches one and a half kilo with a focal point of 800 mm. And that allows me to carry it quietly around my neck using it freehand. To conclude, very satisfied, a great lens with many merits and very few defects, overconsilted. sent on April 17, 2020 |
 | Canon EF 75-300mm f/4-5.6 III Pros: cost lightness Cons: Lacking the stabilizer Opinion: I bought this lens as a kit with canon 550 d, and I immediately replaced with Tamron stabilizzato.rnUltimamente are switched to Fuji and tried to use it again with the adattatore.rnLa yield is' clearly improved, with possibilita'di looking up asa lack stabilizer feels much less, with peacking focus you focus without problems even in manual and is also 'leggerissimo.rnLa sharpness using more' fast times and 'improved and allows me a 450 mm focal length It serves sempre.rnConsiderando the price it deserves an 8. sent on June 02, 2016 |
 | Fujifilm XC 50-230mm f/4.5-6.7 OIS II Pros: Sharpness, light stabilizer, value for '/ great price Cons: plasticky construction, dim Opinion: I bought this lens for about two months and I must say that I am thrilled .rnPagata new € 190 worth much more 'than it costs, has an excellent sharpness, is very light and has a very good stabilizer, I performed at the first shots / 13 to 230 mm without any sign of mosso.rnNon has the aperture ring, but can be adjusted with the wheel, and 'little light, but with Fuji raise his asa is not a problema.rnSicuramente the 55-200 has something in more ', but it costs three times and weighs twice .... it's worth it? rnSoddisfattissimo purchase recommend it to all who want to take good pictures without fainting, considering the price it deserves a 10. sent on May 13, 2016 |
 | Fujifilm X-E1 Pros: Very beautiful retro 'style, spectacular sensor, quality' image stupendous. Cons: A little 'slow Opinion: I bought the XE1 used about a month ago because I was tired of walking around with heavy bags, convinced that the lightness was worth some loss 'quality'. I am immediately changed his mind, despite its small size, the quality 'of the image is outstanding, already' in jpg will make good shots. The estate at high ISO is full-frame, absolutely best of my Canon APS-C, kit lenses is of the highest quality 'and the car despite being an older model enhances the maximum. Of course the speed 'is not comparable to that of an SLR, but for landscape photos, portraits and street I do not create any problem. Result, I sold 5 Canon optics for taking only the naturalistic photo gear in which I think the SLR is unmatched, and I bought 5 optical Fuji's size makes it a companion to take with itself, with 27 mm is a little more ' larger than a compact, but with a performance of the highest level.A tip, if you do not plan to buy a Fuji, never try it, otherwise you will immediately inscimmiati and you can no longer 'do without it. sent on March 31, 2016 |
 | Fujifilm XC 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OIS II Pros: Value for '/ great price, stabilized, clarity, lightness Cons: plasticky construction Opinion: Has a quality '/ exceptional value in comparison to the canon and Nikon kit lenses are ciofeche. Stabilized and with very good sharpness at all focal lengths, contained the distortion. Construction is plasticky and cheap, but really the price at which it is located you can not 'expect more'. Missing the dial aperture, but you can 'adjust with the wheel, however, very convenient. Highly recommended. sent on March 31, 2016 |
 | Lowepro SlingShot 202 AW Pros: Comfortable and roomy Cons: For the moment nothing Opinion: It 'a backpack of compact but very roomy, there is: A Canon 7D more' the Tamron 150-600, 24-105 canon - Tamron 17-50 more 'flash, batteries and spare cards and monopod Manfrotto 680 b. On the shoulder make the necessary weight and turning can be extracted goals without taking him off from his shoulders. The construction is very good, smart and tough and has the rain cover. You want more? Recommended sent on February 09, 2016 |
 | Tamron SP 150-600mm f/5-6.3 Di VC USD Pros: Stabilized, 600 mmm. , Affordable price, sharpness Cons: A little 'soft at full aperture and 600 mm. , Lens hood of poor quality ' Opinion: I bought this lens for about a month and I must say I am very soddisfatto.rnLa AF is fast enough, the sharpness is very good especially up to 500 mm. and the value for 'price is ottimo.rnNaturalmente not you can' compare with supercostosi super telephoto L-series Canon, but by a lot of satisfaction and the possibility 'of taking pictures, equally to people who can not afford to spend digits capogiro.rnPesa about 2 Kg., it must be used with a single foot, but then for a perspective of this kind is a good weight accettabile.rnMolto also recommended stabilizzazione.rnAssolutamente sent on January 08, 2016 |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
