JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).
By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you accept the use of cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.
If you want, you can even enable or disable specific cookies on the page Cookies Preferences.
The Sony FE 200-600mm f/5.6-6.3 G OSS is a supertele lens for FF and APS-C, manufactured from 2019. The focus is done by Linear Motor, it has image stabilization. The average price, when it has been added to the JuzaPhoto database, is 1862 €;
64 users have given it an average vote of 9.3 out of 10.
MOUNT
This lens is available with the following mounts:
Sony E: this lens is compatible with mirrorless fullframe and APS-C Sony.
Do you want add your opinion? You do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments, join discussions and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 211000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.
Pros:lightness, sharpness even at TA, stabilizer, price, af, bokeh
Cons:don't have it, there are no against
Opinion:This lens is a small masterpiece for me. Already in TA, it has the quality a FILINO higher than the Sigma 150-600 S closed at f8, so more than good, but with an autofocus and a much better weight. Obviously the comparisons with the fixed 14,000 euros, are not even to be done, but considering the cost, it allows you to take off a lot of satisfaction and up close it is really sharp.
Pros:Lightness, incredible quality even at TA, works very well also multiplied, stabilizer, top price
Cons:For me none
Opinion:It took me months to make the step to get into ml I was pro reflex and the rest for me was bore and then nothing I decided I bought it and from there the love for sony was born and mirrorless I physically I am a bit of a Pippa before I had to always have the easel now I am always freehand I found the desire to wander in short I changed my life in the naturalistic world , I highly recommend this lens
Opinion:It was a lens that attracted me very soon to come out, but having the 100-400GM that works well with CT, I thought it was superfluous to have this one too. But I was wrong because certain features are really good, such as the fact that it does not change length as the focal length changes, which is very important in naturalistic photography because it introduces movement and scares animals less. Then there is the sharpness that even at TA is really good, even at 600mm, and I would say that you can not ask for more with such a lens. Finally, if we put that even with 1.4x CT the sharpness remains at good levels, as well as the focus, then I have no more doubts to recommend it. With the Sony A9 it is a perfect pairing, allowing a large range of focal points, and always of quality.
Pros:Light, sharpness, stabilization, size, zoom stroke and fire ring accuracy
Cons:is there anything against it?
Opinion:a fantastic lens, moderate price and excellent technical features starting with the brightness the sharpness blurred the speed of zooming via manual ring, fixed length !! and here a great engineering praise, almost impossible to let dirty between the lenses almost too many multifunction keys on the barrel, rubberized lampshade, used with the a7R2 seems almost to amplify the light, idem with R4 while with the A6000 the yield was average, obviously it is not an f2.8 but it does not cost 13,000 euros !! I highly recommend the possession of this magnificent Sony G lens that can absolutely not be missing in the kit of a naturalist photographer I am considering the purchase of the TC1.4X to bring even closer the subjects... we'll see if I make :)
Cons:Maybe it will be me but on my Sony 6400 I am very disappointed.
Opinion:I don't see the sharpness of the images, I find them as coarse grain, I don't know how to explain them, the contours are not defined well, and the colors I find off. Is it possible to see a picture to see if I'm the one who's wrong? I would put photos and use of the shot. I would like your opinion and advice. I thank those who can help me in advance.
The sample photos are selected automatically between all photos posted by JuzaPhoto members, using the camera and the lens selected in the techs. If you find evident errors (e.g. photos taken with cameras and lenses that are not available yet), you can contribute to improve the page by sending a private message to the user that has entered incorrect values in the photo caption.
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.
![[editors pick]](shared_files/layout/ep_badge.jpg){kind=icon}
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.
