JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).
By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you have read your options regarding cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.
You can change in every moment your cookies preferences from the page Cookie Preferences, that can be reached from every page of the website with the link that you find at the bottom of the page; you can also set your preferences directly here
The Sigma 70mm f/2.8 DG Macro Art is a macro lens for FF and APS-C, manufactured from 2018. The focus is done by Lens AF motor (non-ultrasonic), it does not have image stabilization. The average price, when it has been added to the JuzaPhoto database, is 573 €;
19 users have given it an average vote of 9.8 out of 10.
MOUNT
This lens is available with the following mounts:
Canon EF: this lens is compatible with reflex fullframe and APS-C Canon EF.
Sony E: this lens is compatible with mirrorless fullframe and APS-C Sony.
L-Mount: this lens is compatible with mirrorless fullframe and APS-C L-Mount.
Sigma SA: this lens is compatible with reflex and mirrorless fullframe and APS-C Sigma SA-mount.
Do you want add your opinion? You do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments, join discussions and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 242000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.
Opinion:It's probably one of those goals that you either hate or love. I had a lot of lenses and this is undoubtedly the one that most of all made me shout WOW for the sharpness, it leaves you really amazed. Incomparable to the already excellent Canon EF 100 Macro L. I believe that it borders on perfection from many points of view, optically it is a monster! Too bad that the combination of the lack of stabilizer and the slowness of the autofocus makes it almost unusable freehand, despite the lightness and stabilization of the sensor (tested on R5). My specimen then often triggered a boring "focus hunting", despite the correct use of the autofocus limiter. I recommend it to those who do macros only with a tripod and look for sharpness at any cost. For the vote I do not express myself, it would deserve a ten for the photos that it is able to churn out and 5 for what makes you sweat ...
Opinion:It's probably one of those goals that you either hate or love. I had a lot of lenses and this is undoubtedly the one that most of all made me shout WOW for the sharpness, it leaves you really amazed. Incomparable to the already excellent Canon EF 100 Macro L. I believe that it borders on perfection from many points of view, optically it is a monster! Too bad that the combination of the lack of stabilizer and the slowness of the autofocus makes it almost unusable freehand, despite the lightness and stabilization of the sensor (tested on R5). My specimen then often triggered a boring "focus hunting", despite the correct use of the autofocus limiter. I recommend it to those who do macros only with a tripod and look for sharpness at any cost. For the vote I do not express myself, it would deserve a ten for the photos that it is able to churn out and 5 for what makes you sweat ...
Opinion:Taken new at an acceptable price used on eos R system immediately gave me rande satisfaction, so much so that I immediately sell the 100 Canon L is EF version of course. Compared to f 2.8 the sigma is a span on it and the details are surprisingly sharper. The only thing it suffers from is not being is but the ibis system of the R5 and R6 solve this let's call it a defect. Happily satisfied with the replacement also because the focal length 70 also lends itself in portraiture in a different way to the focal length 100, taking into account that I have the 105 art
Pros:Exceptional sharpness, delicious blurry, button to differentiate the MAF, tropicalized.
Cons:Autofocus a bit slow
Opinion:I just got it, but I've already fallen in love with it. The sharpness is great and the blurry is very, very nice. Very useful keys to differentiate the MAF. It is not very light, but it is held very well and by a sense of robustness and is tropicalized. Autofocus is sometimes slow, but I think in a macro it is quite common and in any case in the most pushed photos you use manual MAF. Once again good Sigma, vote 10
user47513
sent on April 19, 2020
Pros:Sharpness
Cons:Autofocus
Opinion:I bought it on Ferorake's advice, because I was uncertain among many others. Even a chicken like me, looking at the photos that churns out this sigma, knows how to understand on the fly the difference between a super and a normal lens. The photos are fantastic, they leave you speechless by how sharp and detailed they are... The blur then is gorgeous. It's probably the lens that makes the most "beautiful" photos I've ever had. More than for macros it entices me to use it for portraits of people and animals or environmental macros The only weak aspect is the autofocus, really slow and noisy... but on the other hand I already knew it at the time of the purchase and for what he has to do the lens is not a problem
The sample photos are selected automatically between all photos posted by JuzaPhoto members, using the camera and the lens selected in the techs. If you find evident errors (e.g. photos taken with cameras and lenses that are not available yet), you can contribute to improve the page by sending a private message to the user that has entered incorrect values in the photo caption.