|
Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
Grego Giovanni www.juzaphoto.com/p/GregoGiovanni ![]() |
![]() | Panasonic Lumix TZ200D / ZS200D Pros: Focal range, size, 1-inch sensor, exaggeratedly rich in functions. Cons: Non-adjustable display, autofocus not always accurate Opinion: Ideal car as a travel companion to always carry with me, I have never been without machines like this, despite the semi-pro kits. I replaced the Sony RX100 IV which objectively in terms of autofocus and lens brightness was superior, to have a longer focal range, reaching almost 400mm with a little thing like this is really priceless. Built well, it doesn't look like a toy, nice the possibility of setting the wheel on the lens to focus, of course you can set other things such as vary the aperture. The performance is excellent, the 1-inch sensor is miraculous, really good details and minimal loss even at maximum focal length. The autofocus as anticipated in extreme situations is a bit mischievous, especially with low light, but you can't ask for miracles. I think it is an extraordinary machine because it contains an incredible concentration of technology in the size of a pack of cigarettes. Promoted and vote 10 sent on January 15, 2025 |
![]() | Sigma 150-600mm f/5-6.3 DG DN OS S Pros: Excursion, stabilization, reconfirmed construction quality, yield and for the type, compactness. Cons: I can't find any. Opinion: Taken as the only alternative for L-Mount, I confirm the validity of the modification project that Sigma has made for mirrorless cameras, to the already tried and tested Contemporary that I had on Nikon reflexes. Having switched to the L system, not yet mature for the objectives of this type of focal range, the only solution on the market was to choose this one. It does everything well, very fun lens, very sharp and unlike the "C" model for Reflex that already degraded from 500mm this is very sharp even at 600. Super stabilization, fabulous even when handheld. For what it offers and at the price it has it is really fantastic, added value being able to multiply it, even to 2x and from what I read in the various tests on the net it should not lose much. For me passed and vote 10 sent on January 15, 2025 |
![]() | Panasonic Lumix S 14-28mm f/4-5.6 Macro Pros: Super sharpness, compact, lightweight, tropicalized no focus breath, filterable, quality feeling. Cons: It doesn't have any. Opinion: Taken to accompany the s1r, I must say that I confirm with what I read in the first reviews read on the internet about its quality. On Nikon I have always had the Re 14 24 2.8 and if you compare it to him for focal range we are really very close but with half the weight, the possibility of filtering it without superstructures. For a landscaper it is really the top, sharp, very sharp even at the edges, if you close it it gives the best. I find it decisive even for my big pixel. Well done Panasonic really with the combination with Leica is doing everything well. sent on June 27, 2024 |
![]() | TTArtisan 11mm f/2.8 Fisheye Pros: Sharpness, color fidelity, solid and economical Cons: Nobody Opinion: Taken for fun and for some different shots, I threw myself directly on AlieXpess with a bomb price, 170 euros + 50 customs against almost double Amazon and Co. Mounted on z6 I can confirm the positive opinions seen here and on other channels, solid lens, all glass and metal. I had already experienced the quality of these Chinese also on Fuji and I can only confirm that even on FF it behaves great, amazed above all by the sharpness at the edges, engineered and assembled better than other emblazoned brands. Clearly given the lack of af should be used well, I also confirm a slight aberration but nothing irretrievable in PP. For the price and performance promoted with flying colors. sent on February 03, 2023 |
![]() | Sony RX100 IV Pros: Ultra portability, electronics, video, optical, build quality, operational completeness for the creative aspect Cons: Lack of tropicalization, price. Opinion: Taken second-hand almost a year ago (new unapproachable) chosen for a trip to Berlin, (I did not want to bring the sherpa with nikon kit) for sporadic outings in lightness and for the ephaly ephemianed video quality. I admit with a little doubt, I did not think it was so high-performance, a lamp of Aladdin, incredible the ability to contain so much quality and technology in a box little bigger than a pack of cigarettes. Starting from the optical aspect, first of all Zeiss, electronic lens 24-70 opening 1.8 - 2.8, stabilized there is little to say, a bijou, cool the ability to choose or zoom or open the diaphragm with the front die, as in the manual goals. A really excellent thumb sensor, creates files with a very good dynamic range, detailed raw images, I found the white balance very good, better even than my d800. The Video Department is really its strong, 4k 30fps in 25p, it creates really amazing cinema images. Spectacular superslomotion at 250/500/1000fps, gives you the chance to create incredible videos. Built-in flash, useful, but nothing exceptional, show instead the retractable electronic viewfinder, the 190-degree tipper screen for excellent histhists. In short, a wonder, certainly born for a use of vlogger, for those who demand discreet photographic quality in an action camera body this is the right machine. I don't remember who said it but it's a good maxim: the best camera is the one you always carry with you. This is undoubtedly an exceptional machine, certainly with the subsequent models will have introduced sensitive improvements but I think the M4 is still the most successful to date also by virtue of the price of the used. Highly recommended! sent on February 03, 2020 |
![]() | Tamron SP 70-200mm f/2.8 Di VC USD G2 Pros: Performance, yield, stabilization, price Cons: Lens hood, Af calibration Opinion: I review this wonderful goal, I use it on d800 and I find it very fast, the weight is normal, as well as the footprint. Excellent yield, it returns very sharp files with a really nice fuzzy. I bought the new lens with a 10 year warranty at a great price with which I would aspire to a used Nikon, probably the old vr1. The lens hood as already pointed out in other reviews is distressful. I had to wait to have from my dealer the tap-in console carry out in the room The calibration end AF A-10, but it is well known that the objectives of 3parti have this defect. Made the calibration no problem indeed, a spectacle of glass! sent on November 08, 2018 |
![]() | Tamron 24-70mm f/2.8 Di VC USD G2 Pros: Yield, sharpness, speed, stabilization, price Cons: Weight and dimensions Opinion: Mindful of the quality I found in 15-30 now that I needed a 24/70 I decided to take the G2, I review it to follow the already abundant positive opinions of this goal. Big and voluminous but less than the Nikon 24/70 I was amazed at the speed and the quality of the yield and sharpness. Works perfectly on D800, the stabilization is exceptional, the quality of the materials used by a good taste in the grip, a small mole could be the focus ring, I think they have designed a little tight but they are hanging. My specimen does not suffer fortunately from FB focus, I recommend it especially by virtue of its value for money. sent on November 06, 2018 |
![]() | Fujifilm X-T2 Pros: Ergonomicity, technology, lightness, dynamic range, ISO seal, JPEG and raw output files, 4k video. Cons: Battery tightness. Opinion: After about a year of use Poesso finally review this machine, I made the transition from full frame Nikon (D3 and d610) not so sure of the choice because of the fact that a mirrorless could not compete for the operation and quality of the files. I have changed my mind almost immediately, an exceptional machine, light, practical, fast, ergonomic, in short, a bomb. Slowly I left the Admirals more and more at home and sold them both. Fuji has outdone itself.. sent on August 01, 2018 |
![]() | Tamron 15-30mm f/2.8 VC USD Pros: Optical, constructive quality, stabilization, openness, tropicalization Cons: Nothing .. Opinion: Wonderful, fast and silent lens, incredible quality, at the ultra-wide angle I think I have the absolute throne.rnThird ciance, tested and had a bit of everyone, from 14-24 to 16-35 nikon and even before 16-16, even the fixed ones, from the 24 sigma art to the ix 15 avuti.rnOther level.rnThe only thing that could be a negative side, I did not write it because i have not yet tested it, is that in the case of humid shots (rain / snow) in the space (the translucent lens) between the front lens and the lens hood could slip the water, so tropicalized to the contrary proof. For all the rest a must have for landscaping..rn for me vote 10.rn sent on October 21, 2017 |
![]() | Sigma 24mm f/1.4 DG HSM Art Pros: Optical quality, constructive strength typical of ART, brightness, sharpness and yield. Cons: Not tropicalized Opinion: Fantastic, bright and solid objective, I believe that the Sigma Art's objectives have exceeded Nikon's and Canon's reputation until recently.rn very sharp, all-opening a little less but it's a wide-angle lens, last of the fixes that I I missed the kit, I picked it in place of the 16-35 nikon I came in.rnScelto between the 24th of nikon I tried, too plastic.rn I was lucky but I did not encounter any autofocus problems .. in case I will tarry ..rn sent on September 08, 2017 |
![]() | Nikon AF-S 300mm f/4 D ED Pros: Constructive quality, compactness, yield. Cons: Functional slope, collar Opinion: A very good lens built with care and quality materials is used at a very competitive price. I use it on the d610 and I'm excited to say it is very good also on a good dx.rn. It especially appreciates the sharpness, although it is not tropicalized it does not mind the ignorant outputs. True as it also made for a macro use, but not having the vr from the maximum in good light conditions. rnWelcome !! sent on July 30, 2017 |
![]() | Nikon 1 J5 Pros: Technology, Shutter Speed, Iso Hold, Pleasant Body, Raw, Crop Factor. Cons: Eyecup, not tropicalized. Opinion: I was looking for a machine to always carry with me, I tried it so much, I've tried it a lot, from Sony's rx100 to Fuji x100, going for the alpha 6000 .. budget tight at the bottom, after all I have the feflex for the series photos .rn Any choice made, found to be used with 3 days of life I take, with lens 10 30 from kit is ft adapter for the goals i have at home .. i have to say i am pleasantly surprised.rnoperative from now, 4k video, excellent portability , Great for street, wifi, nfc, and a mountain of electronic devilies, from picture control to camera effects. I should say that I was surprised at the upkeep of the Iso Iso, my old d300s went into crisis at 800 this at 6400 A sensor is the smallest half.rn I then mounted the ft1 adapter that allows to mount all the nikkor targets.rnImproved 64 fps with 300mm that with crop factor becomes 800 what you can do on a track board.rn anyway, what I was looking for was a machine Ultra door Tile to be affixed to the d610 and I can say I have made the center for my needs. Rnrnrnrn sent on June 30, 2017 |
![]() | Tokina AT-X 16-28mm f/2.8 Pro FX Pros: Quality, sharpness, brightness, price Cons: flare Opinion: Target selected from the Tamron 15-30 and 14-24 nikon because of the price, I am very satisfied because with 400 euro I found a very good lens. rnParto by saying that absolutely can not be compared to the level to those of Nikon lenses, the 14-24 does not fight and can not be said contrario.rnLa construction is solid, according to many is a plasticone but handheld and I tested the competitors mentioned above I must say that looks good is not even a po.rnL'autofocus ultrasound but found him not at all slow, even with D610 is very veloce.rnLa sharpness is excellent, a little more around 20mm, at f11 is a samurai..rnNon blade like the flare against the light, but is a consequence of the lack of treatment of lenti.rnLa my conclusion is that if you do not want to spend a fortune for your outfit and look for a more objective landscaped that great, this is for voi.rnrn sent on February 01, 2017 |
May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me