JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).
By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you accept the use of cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.
The Fujifilm X-T2 is a mirrorless camera with APS-C (1.5x) sensor and 24.3 megapixels manufactured from 2016 to 2018 (discontinued). The range of sensitivities, including ISO extension, is 100 - 51200 ISO and it has a continuous shooting (burst mode) of 14 FPS x 28 RAW, 42 JPEG. The average price, when it has been added to the JuzaPhoto database, is 938 €;
124 users have given it an average vote of 9.4 out of 10
Do you want add your opinion? You do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments, join discussions and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 199000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
Pros: Very much like X-T1, almost identical. Where it has been changed, the changes are almost all good. It can give good, clean, big image and you can crop this image quite a bit if you need to. (24 mp)
Cons: Ridiculous interface with too many toggles and switches. Too long menu (too many settings). Expensive even now that it is retired (X-T3 is the present model). Fuji lenses are ridiculously expensive and neither Sigma nor Tamron make alternative lenses for X-T2. So if you buy one, you are in for VERY VERY expensive adventures in the lenses shop.
Opinion: Compared to the earlier X-T1 this camera is a move in the right direction. The problem is it is only a small move. If X-T3 is a similar small move, I will not buy X-T3 and go for another brand. The good things are actually good: the image is much better than from X-T1 (which was good but not brilliant) and easily competes with any other top shelf aps-c (small) sensor. In my opinion it also competes with many FF sensors. The camera seems to underexpose by at least 0.5 point, possibly about 1 point. Jpeg files are huge and not easy to downsize for the screen - so the camera is very good choice for those who need big files (e.g. to print big images) but not a good choice for those who always shoot for the web/blog/etc. My impression is that this camera could be used for some kinds of professional work because the image it creates is big, detailed, sharp and very kind to the eye. The big downside of the camera is the stupid Fuji 'retro' interface. But Fuji engineers have never held a real retro camera in hand (e.g. an FM2). So I will keep this camera for a time and see if I can get used to it. I got it with a super duper discount and with a full 2 year warranty. The discount is because new X-T3 is on the market now and there is virtually zero local demand for Fuji cameras.
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.
Cons:Some might say iso over 6400 but what the hell should be done to higher iso?
Opinion:I write this review in a sad time because my xt2 after 3 and a half years of honored career is beating the last blows. Despite this I think she was a crazy travel companion and I can say that I started my career as a professional photographer with her (as my only job, with my studio not second so this stuff here). after a short interlude with Nikon d7500 and d800 with which I found it really bad to land in Fuji with this was a dream. We've had some disagreements over time mainly because I saw the other houses go on and Fuji, let's face it stay a little bit at the pole. But what a nice pole. In short, Fuji is crazy in every way. I used it for professional videos, wedding photo shoots, fashion and I found myself enchanted. With this apsc I also did campaigns where the file was printed 2 meters by 3 and I think it would have been great for larger prints. Fuji at the file level I think is the best although contrary to those who say otherwise my problem I had with a maybe excessive sharpness that always leads to having to touch up the skin. jpg if taken not for work are perfect. Now after almost 4 years I have moved to Canon eos r and I have to eye a file that I think is very different but I still do not understand if better or worse. At most I'll be back in fuji taking the xt3.... Wonder... The xt2 was the perfect machine for me.
Pros:High iso hold, jpeg quality, af speed, colors comparable to film, delicious bn
Cons:Pitiful battery life
Opinion:For a year I have completely modified my photo kit. I sold my Canon ff equipment with L-series lenses and switched to Leica Q2 to which I joined this Fuji xt2. What to say, it fully satisfies my idea of photos. The Fuji world is not unknown to me, having already owned an X100 is an xt1. I paired it at 18 55, at 55 200 it's at a fixed 27. The only flaw is the battery life. I made up for it with the purchase of 2 more pieces. Rating 9.5.
Pros:Robustness, weight, price of used, high iso seal, overall quality, customizable, menu simplicity
Cons:Size (for those coming from the top of the canon range), absolute need for battery grip, both to increase its size and for batteries
Opinion:I recently sold all my canon equipment (1d mk iv, 24-105L and 28-70L f2.8) and I don't miss it at all. I bought this tank at a really affordable price 550 euros, along with a fujinon 18-55 2.8-4 at 250 euros. With 800 euros I have a decent starting equipment, although maybe I will switch to a fujinon 18-135, to have all the focal covers and I feel satisfied. It may sound silly, but it is a machine that would be able to use even a child, if you put everything automatically the machine (a rather rare case for those of its headband) makes beautiful shots. The iso are real and usable up to 12000, this is also a great novelty for me, until today I was forced to stop on the 3200, here the noise is there but it is not colored and therefore does not bother me. While the entry level kit is quite cheap, the other optics are not, but the quality is already assured in this 18-55, tropicalized, crisp and fast (despite not being ultrasonic it does not make any noise and focheggia on any subject; in case of poor lights a light and focuses even in the dark). The guineas are in 80% of the cases fluid and pleasant, only the smaller ones of the shooting modes and the display meter are a bit uncomfortable. The viewfinder is fast, it doesn't even seem to be electronic, the display is a little slower and orients well only vertically (occasionally I play pretending it's a cockpit sight). Sore button is the ergonomics, greatly improved with the purchase of the vertical grip, and the battery with ridiculous life, but I have pre-empt 5 batteries, of which 3 to keep inserted with the bg. The jump from aps-h to mirrorless with crop 1.5 tempted me and scared me at the same time, I must say that the landing was pleasant.
Pros:Colors and white balance, hold noise that does not make the FF regret too much, direct commands, lenses with PDC reduced almost comparable to the FF, viewfinder
Cons:Zoom lenses not always up to par, good lenses are often without rain resistance and/or with slow autofocus, the dynamic range is not that of a FF even with low use (maybe some think so), conversion in the machine of unnerving raw, zooms are not much ( if not the red xf)
Opinion:I've been using it for 9 months and I give it 8.5/9 as a vote and system. I took it when prices dropped for the arrival of the xt3 otherwise I wouldn't have taken it. It's a great trade-off between FF and 4/3 portability. The image quality, especially in shadow and light recovery, is not that of Sony a7 mark2. But it's more than enough and the noise holds it up well. Fixed lenses provide shallow depth of field that does not make the FF regret. The colors and white balance are very good compared to the Sony a7 and the Panasonic GX 85 that I had. The main problem for is the lack on the best stabilizer lenses, the lack of protection to the water (although in the rain nothing happened to me with the 23 1.4) and the lack of a fast autofocus. They didn't make the series A and B lenses. The perfect machine does not exist, this is a great all-rounder (although the FF in the matter of weights and costs are not far away)
The sample photos are selected automatically between all photos posted by JuzaPhoto members, using the camera and the lens selected in the techs. If you find evident errors (e.g. photos taken with cameras and lenses that are not available yet), you can contribute to improve the page by sending a private message to the user that has entered incorrect values in the photo caption.
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.
![[editors pick]](shared_files/layout/ep_badge.jpg){kind=icon}
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.
