JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).
By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you accept the use of cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.
The Fujifilm X-T2 is a mirrorless camera with APS-C (1.5x) sensor and 24.3 megapixels manufactured from 2016 to 2018 (discontinued). The range of sensitivities, including ISO extension, is 100 - 51200 ISO and it has a continuous shooting (burst mode) of 14 FPS x 28 RAW, 42 JPEG. The average price, when it has been added to the JuzaPhoto database, is 938 €;
109 users have given it an average vote of 9.4 out of 10
Do you want add your opinion? You do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments, join discussions and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 182000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
Pros: Very much like X-T1, almost identical. Where it has been changed, the changes are almost all good. It can give good, clean, big image and you can crop this image quite a bit if you need to. (24 mp)
Cons: Ridiculous interface with too many toggles and switches. Too long menu (too many settings). Expensive even now that it is retired (X-T3 is the present model). Fuji lenses are ridiculously expensive and neither Sigma nor Tamron make alternative lenses for X-T2. So if you buy one, you are in for VERY VERY expensive adventures in the lenses shop.
Opinion: Compared to the earlier X-T1 this camera is a move in the right direction. The problem is it is only a small move. If X-T3 is a similar small move, I will not buy X-T3 and go for another brand. The good things are actually good: the image is much better than from X-T1 (which was good but not brilliant) and easily competes with any other top shelf aps-c (small) sensor. In my opinion it also competes with many FF sensors. The camera seems to underexpose by at least 0.5 point, possibly about 1 point. Jpeg files are huge and not easy to downsize for the screen - so the camera is very good choice for those who need big files (e.g. to print big images) but not a good choice for those who always shoot for the web/blog/etc. My impression is that this camera could be used for some kinds of professional work because the image it creates is big, detailed, sharp and very kind to the eye. The big downside of the camera is the stupid Fuji 'retro' interface. But Fuji engineers have never held a real retro camera in hand (e.g. an FM2). So I will keep this camera for a time and see if I can get used to it. I got it with a super duper discount and with a full 2 year warranty. The discount is because new X-T3 is on the market now and there is virtually zero local demand for Fuji cameras.
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.
Pros:Colors and white balance, hold noise that does not make the FF regret too much, direct commands, lenses with PDC reduced almost comparable to the FF, viewfinder
Cons:Zoom lenses not always up to par, good lenses are often without rain resistance and/or with slow autofocus, the dynamic range is not that of a FF even with low use (maybe some think so), conversion in the machine of unnerving raw, zooms are not much ( if not the red xf)
Opinion:I've been using it for 9 months and I give it 8.5/9 as a vote and system. I took it when prices dropped for the arrival of the xt3 otherwise I wouldn't have taken it. It's a great trade-off between FF and 4/3 portability. The image quality, especially in shadow and light recovery, is not that of Sony a7 mark2. But it's more than enough and the noise holds it up well. Fixed lenses provide shallow depth of field that does not make the FF regret. The colors and white balance are very good compared to the Sony a7 and the Panasonic GX 85 that I had. The main problem for is the lack on the best stabilizer lenses, the lack of protection to the water (although in the rain nothing happened to me with the 23 1.4) and the lack of a fast autofocus. They didn't make the series A and B lenses. The perfect machine does not exist, this is a great all-rounder (although the FF in the matter of weights and costs are not far away)
Opinion:After falling in love with Fuji with an X100S, I sold all my Canon kit to take the X-T2, I was long undecided whether to take this or the X-T3, or an X-T20/30, but then, thanks to a very affordable price - even considering that it has been a long time coming Ita the X-T3 - I opted for the X-T2. In addition to the affordable price, I was convinced that the X-T2 files work perfectly with Lr6, not forcing me to a subscription with Adobe. The machine is beautiful, like all the other Fuji, certainly not a feather weight but comparable to the entry levels Canon (almost identical to my old 760D), but with a much higher quality and characteristics; excellent ergonomics, especially when compared to the X100 series, which are a bit small for my hands. Many customizable keys and the dials available. The strength of the Fuji system are definitely the files (especially the JPg SOOC) and the goals, all of a truly exceptional quality, although then the price goes up a little: forget the Canon goals from 100 euros or a little more (I think the excellent 50STM or 24STM) , but expect a quality comparable to Canon's L-series. I mean, i think the X-T2 is still a machine that I would recommend.
Pros:Used has an honest cost, is small and light, has a nice viewfinder and everything is where it needs to be.
Cons:First of all the battery, working with a machine that does 300 shots I think is IMPOSSIBILE. I use it for work, but like all the fuji that I had heats up a lot and after a few shots, during a session sometimes it is blocked and goes off and on again, or no longer focuses anything.
Opinion:It's a small car outside and big inside, you hold it in your hand like a compact with steroids, the graves are beautiful and very comfortable, you set everything up in a flash. Unfortunately, Fuji does not give me much reliability because often (both she and my H1) the autofocus crashes or impasses. I tried to reinstall the firmware, but it did not solve, turning off and reoning then restarts immediately, I took it as a price to pay to switch from Reflex to mirrorless, after all even the first digital did not work just like a watch, then I trust in Fuji that creates a more stable update. The files it churns out are beautiful and workable, personally I do not use Jpeg that, even if they made the fortune of Fuji, I do not like. I come from the film that I still use with satisfaction and apart from the Acros simulation, the others I find a very cunning means to sell cameras. I always shoot in Raw that I find really good, at the high iso behaves nice and does not vary colors, I use the color grading with each shot and also having a Sony A7 at the end the results are quite similar since then the colors vary them to my liking. In short, to this Xt2 I give full sufficiency, nothing miraculous and nothing dramatic, a great machine to play and mediocre to work.
Pros:File quality in jpeg, tropicalization, weight, optical quality
Cons:Selectors ghiere, suboptimal ergonomics
Opinion:Good evening, I am the owner of a blog, trekker, mountaineer 4 seasons where I make and publish articles, but especially photographs, with predominant subject the environment Outdoor Mountain, on average I spend 250 days/year between the Mountains, in every season and condition Weather, I needed a light machine body, tropicalized, optics with a high price/quality ratio, I'm not interested in videos, my "philosophy" is to create reports and images that reflect reality and know how to transmit and communicate emotions without artifice in "post production", I do not and do not want PS/LR and various sw to work images, the camera must be an additional "eye" that memorizes all this!!! with the FUJI XT2 I found the camera I was looking for. JPEG files that are, almost always, usable as they are( if they don't go well I'll throw them back) just don't overdo it with VELVIA, great image detail, not excessive weight of the Camera/Target set, good tropicalization, handy commands. I would have preferred better ergonomics with a more pronounced handle (in the style of Olimpus om de m1), but with an "additional" I almost solved with a few tens of euros, I find that the selectors, coasial to the guineas, are uncomfortable and a little "rough" to use
The sample photos are selected automatically between all photos posted by JuzaPhoto members, using the camera and the lens selected in the techs. If you find evident errors (e.g. photos taken with cameras and lenses that are not available yet), you can contribute to improve the page by sending a private message to the user that has entered incorrect values in the photo caption.
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.
![[editors pick]](shared_files/layout/ep_badge.jpg){kind=icon}
