|
| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
Japko www.juzaphoto.com/p/Japko  |
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator. | Canon EF-S 18-135mm f/3.5-5.6 IS STM Pros: Optics many practice and comada as an all-rounder. If you know what you buy, well you know how you should use it and what to expect. Cons: At times the stabilizer must "understand" and if it is not stationary, then there is a risk of micro blur. Opinion: The 24-105L that I used fixed on the 5Dmkii failed. Then wanting to change... I took a Sigma 17-35, but the feeling didn't click. Anyway I missed the longer focal length... In short, the 5D remained on the stock exchange. I have been shooting for years then out the legendary 7D mki, with the classic 18-55 IS from the kit. Surprised that today between ACR, profiles and AI... well the shots weren't that bad. So I decide to give her a second chance. I tried a 15-85 which, although excellent, I was missing a few millimeters for the real all-rounder. I've read around a lot... and I realized that the predecessors of the 18-135 kit were in fact very poor. The STM variant, however, fared much better. In fact it seems to have an extra UD lens... ? Well, the difference is very noticeable. I got it on a well-known site of used 100 bags and boom snapped the feeling. Always coming from good L and FF series glasses, I must say that the combo doesn't suck. Indeed! I immediately felt good in readiness, ergonomics and weights. Optically it is good as long as you always set f/8. Autofocus good and fast, but sometimes lacks at 135mm, that is, it struggles to refresh a point if before it was set very closely. But in short, it can be there. No discrepancies or disappointing notes, if as I said you keep it at f/8 where it gives graphs and in practice gives the best on all focal lengths. A sore point is the stabilizer that sometimes does not "stop" and perhaps causes micro-blur. This is mostly at higher focal lengths. So I have to say excellent lens for lighter and calmer rides. It doesn't want to be a fast lens for sports etc... Understanding its limitations, I get excellent results for me. I think the 7D is already at the limit of the Mpix 18, to make sure that the lens solves them all. 15Mpix in my opinion would be better. But even so, it's fine. I know that there is the new USM version but I can't say on an optical level how it lends itself. If it's the same or similar in build and quality as the new 70-300IS USM, well then I think it's worth it. The cost, however, is already triple if not more. With this old 7D and 18-135 combo, well even if I get it or forget around... at worst maybe 200 francs, and not a thousand and more with another setup. Moreover, it is inconspicuous! sent on September 30, 2024 |
 | Canon 7D Pros: Ergonomics, construction, reliability, and overall quality make it a reflex lady even in 2024! Cons: The black AF points... I don't like them Opinion: I got this reflex at the ridiculous figure of 160e used, rubbed body, hard keys... had been stopped for some time. Taken up by me, passed a cloth over it, pressed all the keys twice, it became 100% functional again. So passed with flying colors. I have owned the 5D, the mkii, 1Ds mkii, 1DX, 40D, etc... As a coprpo it has excellent ergonomics, very good viewfinder. He hasn't betrayed me yet, that's it. I must say that more than one person complains about noisy ISOs... Maybe yes, but today with AI you can remove the noise in one click. That said, the file, even if noisy after 1600-3200 (a matter of opinion though...) remains "crispy" and clean. Without many artifacts. What I like is the shutter speed, the buffer, in short, the operation always ready. The "only" 18mp are not a problem, indeed in some ways a PLUS. It doesn't need L lenses to give its best like some FF bodies, where if you don't have the red line in front of you, it doesn't have sharpness and quality. I only took it to have the 1.6x factor of the sensor, which I use on the 70-300 USM II. Together they don't make a fuss. Without having a very expensive kit, both the 7D and the telephoto are perfect together. I don't need any extender, and I get almost to 500mm at F5.6 where the lens itself is stra great at TA! What more could you want? So I would say that the fame of a reflex gentleman is more than justified, from every point of view. sent on September 09, 2024 |
 | Canon EF 28-135mm f/3.5-5.6 IS USM Pros: Lightweight, practical and standard focal ranges always at your fingertips. Cons: For the cost I would say nothing. It is not an L series but it defends itself. Opinion: Recently taken to replace a 24-105L that has decided to stop working the diaphragm group!! The 28-135 has its greater versatility, lower weight and smaller footprint. Optically it suffers from AC but in PP I eliminate it in an instant. IDEM disstronions. It does not give you the feeling of robustness of an L lens but to know it first you must have it and therefore also from this point of view the lens is built well. It lacks a lower micro contrast than the 24-105. Maybe that's just what makes it different. But otherwise if used well and closed at f8/11 from in better. The price of used is ridiculous when compared to the 24-105L! AF and IS good and not at all slow or limiting in use. So in my opinion having tried both I miss the extra 4mm and a micro engraving / three-dimensionality of the 24-105. For the rest VOTE 8,5! Paid 80,00€ perfect used! P.S. the 24-105 also has its defects and in fact the "L" deserves it for sure, but it also has gaps ... sent on March 29, 2023 |
 | Canon EF 70-300mm f/4-5.6 IS USM II Pros: All for the price! Unreachable if you don't need an L series. Cons: Nothing at all, maybe just the first hook of the stabilizer. Opinion: Reluctant to make reviews... but here it is a must. Now someone will ling me but... surpasses in image quality the smooth white 70-200L f4! I confirm it as I had it and overused it but on APS-C it suffered from the complexity of the lenses. Especially at night and with very marked reflections. QUi we are instead on FF 5D mkii goes great. On 7D this lens is sewn. It has only a slight drop at the edges that in reality I can say that it is minimal and that it is also the fault of the refraction-cleaning of the air when on APS-C it reaches 480mm. A small flaw (always for the price of the lens) perhaps only the first hook of the stabilizer. A Tamron equal focal the stabilizer starts immediately... Here it has a micro lag before you decide whether to correct vertically or orrizanthally. But when he takes (Anyway right away) it's like having a tripod. 4 safe stops. 480mm at 1/60 holds up very well. So if you don't have to stress the lens and use it as a pro L (born to be smunti) is for you. If you need safety, tropicalization, metal,... etc... then go to L series. For the rest I repeat for myself that I have had many lenses and for the major L series it is unattainable for price performance. Found used at 300e with warranty I have not yet removed it from the 7D for 1 year. I had the bianchino that I was moltipliavo with extender 1,4mkII but ... we are not even far away. The 2xII idem... DeIffrazione, drop on 5Dmkii and 1dsmkii. Then promoted to safe grade 9. sent on November 16, 2021 |
 | Sigma 150-600mm f/5-6.3 DG OS HSM C Pros: Only the IMHO price that makes it a false myth Cons: many things... Opinion: I made the return of the lens after only 2gg.rnOra me lincerete saying that the lens in question is worth all the money spent, which is clear etc ... rnA my modest warning for € 1000.00 should give more species in sharpness, construction (beautiful plastics but you notice that they are still cheap). rnI have not found the right feeling ne on 1DS mkII ne on 5D. Nothing to do.rnLe photos also on tripod they sin AF not precise F / B. (because I have to buy the Dock and then dismantle understand that my model was born badly?) rnParadossalmente was sharper with a Canon 2x mkii that smooth! A tremendous thing.rnCon Sigma I've never had positive feelings. My limits will be ... but with this brand you always have to fend.rnArrivo 400mm with the bianchino duplicate that af / 11 makes better than Sigma on short distances ... rnTherefore low rating.rnNot want to influence other people with my experience negative ... but today as today I would opt for anything else to get to 600mm on FF.rnAlso an old 300 / f Canon with 2X IMHO holds up better! rnOne positive note is that the AF at least was reattivo fast enough to hook ... but still sins strongly in B / F. sent on March 22, 2018 |
 | Canon EF 28mm f/1.8 USM Pros: Light, luminous, excellent quality already at TA. Cons: For the performance price none! I just poured a blurred but nervous twist. Opinion: I've been looking for this lens for a long time now, and I've finally found it. Analyzing my shots in some scenes I used the 28mm zoom lens with 24-105L zoom but I always missed at least 1-2 stop in the interior. Now with the 28mm 1.8 I go quiet.rn I have to dislodge the MTF curves and various tests where it turns out that apart from the center the edges disgust even by closing ... my specimen is great, a blade at 2.8 but defends well af /2.0. A TA 1.8 is just a soft pelina but is recovered immediately in PP. It has a very clear central area of ??sharpness that allows it to make beautiful set backs and impressive blur effects. The blur is durable but still pleasing. If you developed RAW with a SW at the height (DXO use) it really pulls out the top cover + lens.rnHo also the 35mm f / 2 old which is not bad at all but ... not using as much 35mm ... I put it down and maybe I sell it. In terms of AF it is a true lightning suppur the lens has its years (as a project). Ultimately, I'm happy and I recommend it to those who like me on the 28mm and the serYou have a fast, bright, portable and quality lens. Perfect for a 28-50-100mm triad of the same serie.rn sent on May 03, 2017 |
 | Canon EF 2.0x II Pros: Price to be used, yield, Construction, Tropicalizzato.rn Cons: None when used with a number 1! Opinion: Taken recently used. I use it with the 70-200 L f / 4 smooth. It is giving me beautiful soddisfazzioni. By doing so I'm getting close to the 400mm focal length to see if I like it and no svenarmi. M idiviene an f / 8, but during the day no problem. AF fast even if only the center of 1D. Direc which is very valuable this extender. Working well the files you are obtained excellent results even with home zoom and Canon not only with fixed. sent on August 22, 2016 |
 | Canon EF 50mm f/1.4 USM Pros: Bright, sharp as a knife excellent colors and very vivid contrast. Cons: MF ring that hardens with time ... Opinion: I took this lens used to 200.00 € and I am overjoyed. I tried now in many different ways. Maybe because my copy is successful, but I must say it is very clear already at TA. No strange flare or AC obvious to give disorder. Using indoors for ceremonies and the like is domostra very valid. 2.8 onwards is magnificent. At f / 5 hole in the screen. very mounted varies on different cameras. At least this is my impression. On 1ds mkii excellent and beautiful outdoors while with the 5d fantastic old indoors. A vivid and real contrast. It may be that the 16-odd MP of 1ds are perhaps too many for the 50 but with the 12.7 of 5 churns out again in the splendid internal files. Shadows, highlights perfette.rnQUindi one of my Sharpening purchases. For the money of the new or rather the lens used is a splendid IMHO.rn sent on April 21, 2016 |
 | Canon 1Ds Mark II Pros: Body PRO! Ergonomics, speed and amazing quality files Cons: For me, no or maybe just not being able to write different formats on one of the two memory cards Opinion: What about ... I found the reflex in physical store to € 250.00 with three months warranty and 111,000 scatti.rnDa owner of the 5D mkI I was already happy. Seeing an ad online I slingshots and immediately taken without esitare.rnBeh it for 250 € was grafiata without two small screws ... with dead pixels, but ... all risolvibile.rnrnPresa to make two shots in the yard grardato on horrific display and I said well ... ok 250 euro .... are not tanti.rnrnVado on iMac 27 and unloading the RAW.rnUAuuuuuu that file! Wonderful! To all ISO ... fantastic reflex. wonderful autofocus, spot metering that works !!! Exposure to 90% always right. Focus very precise with or without side lenses and 1.4 !!!!! Mom tank which is always reflex.rnDa this was just a dream seen 8000 EUR dell'epoca.rnOra to 11 years later I realize it was worth it all! But really everyone. RAW Development with DXO is unthinkable pull out details. Recovery magnificent shadows. WB very good if not excellent. ISO 1600 beautiful! 3200 artistic and with NR as it should you miss it of agreementsFine-grained finish. I estrememente happy. The 5D is no battery in the drawer! RnSulla 1 I put the 50mm 1.4 and is a marvel. Then almost without display are returned at last to take tastefully as I did many years ago! I rnChi law and some year or more know what I mean. rnGrazie Canon had baked this camera! rnrnAggiunta on: 19.1.2016rnsono out for a walk in a natural park and arrived I realized that he still has only one battery notch! rnHo made over 150 photos not to succumb or be extinguished. Mitica! RnrnAD TODAY 2017: rnmacchina splendida.rnOra after a year of use and software for today's RAW produces magnificent files. Amen nothing to say. Perhaps only flaw in the buffer but for my purposes it's okay. The I buy back with eyes closed. Indeed I'm looking for another to be attached to this. Not a photo cane AF module. Perfect 45 points. Truly excellent also the file to 3200 if developed as deve.rnSe had a push to 6400 would be ideal, but it also survives comfortably without. Legendary SLR! It took mesi to understand it, tame it, but now I know it is worth every penny of what costava.rn sent on December 22, 2015 |
 | Olympus XZ-2 iHS Pros: Compact and solid construction to the top. Optical fabulous! Cons: Nothing or perhaps only the lack of a wide-angle wider Opinion: 26egrave; fantastcamente fluid and finally put the AE lock! rn sent on August 19, 2015 |
 | Sigma EF-610 DG ST Pros: Cheap, good construction and lots of power. Cons: Selectors small and uncomfortable, poor battery compartment adjustable reflectors separately. Opinion: I took this flash Sigma after my Canon Speedlite 580EXII began to give way and I was not real and need rispendere the same money for one original. That said list the points that I think are in favore.rnPotenza lightning striking and comparable to Canon. Material of construction very good. Excellent to the touch. Good tightening screw, classic but effective. The rapid tightening of Canon I have never perticolarmente exalted if not for convenience and speed! RnNote in my negative: rnSportello batteries absurdly retro super and not as a mechanism for ergonomics and speed of closing. Missing drawings reference frame to properly orient the batteries. SI one thinks that this is not a problem but when you're in a hurry I assure you that these have disegnetti with the + and less are vital! The second thing that puzzles me is the noise of automatic dish. Slightly more annoying and "mechanic" of the Canon. Thirdly switch too small! Definitely too small and too close shots. Bisgona staycareful step that turns on the flash because you risk too easy to move immediately to "M" at full power and then you lose the TTL that is placed at the top of the selector. I would have seen better at the end of the race to DX. So one is safer not to make mistakes and always have the TTL active. Last thing buttons parable. Excellent vertical, uncomfortable and small orrizzontale.rnrnDetto what all this I feel vivemente advise qusto flash in value budget has eguali.rnPotente, well built and equipped with the essentials for working ottimemente with my Canon DSLR 5D.rnAd a professional so inclined because it is done for me for work and daily or constant to be outdoors in the rain etc ... rnPer the amateur photographer or an evolved instead matrimonialista I can really cosigliare. sent on June 17, 2015 |
 | Canon EF 35mm f/2.0 Pros: Lightweight and well built. Optimum efficiency even at room temperature. Perfect for street and reportage out / indoor. AF albeit not USM fast and accurate. Unusable side AF points with a 5D MKi. Cons: Suffer from flare greatly in extreme conditions not yet even if you use the lens hood. AF motor noisy but I really thought worse. Opinion: I state that I own other optics "L" series of the house but I have to say that the Canon 35mm will not be fixed to the top of the range but does very well. Fast AF and TA in excellent yield. At f / 2 great cuts in the backgrounds. Mm lens from the right people for street and reportage. Just like coma to me. Great for portraits half-length. I was undecided whether to take it or not and now that I've used a whole afternoon not unmount the most from the camera body. We read that sticker enough to F2. I do not seem ... what little instead makes the photos more details. I like also the focus even though under certain conditions it is slightly hard. But even here it is a matter of taste and what you have to do the final product. In conclusion then I have to say that from f5, 6 to f11 is a blade. Excellent color rendering which are not altered. Excellent contrast. In conclusion a obietivo that I think will remain firmly in the 5D for a long tempo.rnConsigliato those who do not want gutted and did not rush to freeze attimmi. It seems to me quite a return to the past with beautiful photos and real. A tridimensionalismo of the past. sent on August 06, 2013 |
 | Canon 5D Pros: Body and controls perfect for large hands. Excellent yield of the file. Never felt the need of more Mpix.! Perfect up to 1600. Amazing quality files for the years he has behind him. rnCompete and in some cases won by many cameras today! Cons: Slight banding with long lead times to ISO 3200, right in the laboratory. Quality of rear display that fades with time at the sides. Tends to get dirty often sensore.rn Opinion: Camera that can offer superb photographic results today. Of course it is clear lens "L" and a few fixed. Super workable files it generates. Fast and commands to the right place. I got it used and I'm delighted. Perfect prints even at ISO 3200 (matter of taste and noise). "Grana pleasant up to ISO 1600. Excellent for traveling though heavy. But you know the quality you pay for in terms of weight and money ... Even today, I would highly recommend it for anyone who wants to figures avvinicarsi changes effectively and use the FF format . rnDetto what I'm happy because he has video capability but only photos! So we focus exclusively on taking pictures. lunto Autofocus on the central ababstanza fast and accurate. Sometimes with certain subjects MAF is slow ... but we are talking about small deviations . The only drawback is the absence of at least a minimal tropicalization. Otherwise great car! gives me great satisfaction! sent on March 29, 2013 |
 | Canon PowerShot S95 Pros: Small and solid. Excellent quality pictures. Perfect for short trips and scapagnate. Positive that shooting in RAW. If well managed files you get great prints A4! Cons: The Canon did not put the bulb! This is a major limitation. But patience ... more does not have the ND filter! Opinion: Compact camera and very solid. Fall several times :-( is still fully functional. Perfect positioning of the rings and buttons. Perfect custom button so you can quickly set up a function that is now ... as the AEB. Good front ring. The display is excellent and quite large. makes pictures very beautiful des Vins Vaudois. produces files really good. Up to medium focal and working in RAW files are obtained really very good. Enough to think that it is some reflex them ... surely the opening of the diafframmi maximum telephoto (105mm) f / 4.9 is too little. was hoping at least one f / 4 but never mind. Along the same focal length does not make it to the maximum. Species for portraits f / 4.9 does not help. Well with regard to the menu user. Easy to understand and easy. Generally buy the pen again soon saw that the s95 does not filmed in HD, 100 though there is no custom button ... For the last true two criticisms: the lack pose "B" or at least get at least 30 "instead of 15." And I do not understand why on a compact TOP from € 450.00 noput an ND filter! I had to make me one with a lathe, filetttaarlo and locate it on the lens, ... sin. Half criticism also goes to the HDMI port which is kind of mini and requires an adapter to your TV (but lose the Canon because the compact is small and thin ... RNLA Board cmq. All the advanced amateur photographer who occasionally not want or can not carry around the camera. sent on March 28, 2013 |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
