|
Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
Nike www.juzaphoto.com/p/Nike ![]() |
![]() | OM System OM-3 Pros: Excellent metal workmanship, from the touch you can guess the quality of the product, impeccable construction as Olympus tradition, every button and button in the right place, excellent image quality, almost like its older sister OM-1, stabilization and portability make it a high-level camera. Cons: For my use I have not found any defects, I find it very practical Opinion: Like all the latest OMSYSTEM products immediately praised then slowly more and more liked, this camera, however, is really beautiful and functional in every aspect, with its resemblance to retro and vintage cameras it is enjoying a lot of success, I have owned it for about 15 days, and I can speak of it more than well, also having the older sister OM-1 II, practically the files are identical in quality, but with OM-3 you can have fun and create jpeg images with the CP key and color profiles you can create your favorite image without having to go fiddling around on the PC. The tactile sensation it transmits is beautiful and unique, this camera winks at landscape and street photographers, I also tried it on the monopod with the 300f4 in birdlife, but I was not thrilled, in fact for this type of photo there is the OM-1. Using this OM-3 is a lot of fun, you think more about the substance of the shot as we used to do with film, taken with the 12-45f4 kit it weighs with the 750g lens so you don't realize you have it at your fingertips. The strong point remains the stacked sensor with excellent image quality, then there are the Live ND filters up to ND64, and the new Live GND much appreciated for landscape photos, obviously shooting in high resolution, with the 80MP 14-Bit tripod, 50MP freehand. For those who were finally looking for a camera with first-class quality, with reportage camera dimensions. sent on March 09, 2025 |
![]() | OM System M.Zuiko ED 150-600mm f/5-6.3 IS Pros: Stabilization, focal length, quality over the entire focal length, especially at 600mm I found it very engraved, a wonderful blur Cons: To be a micro 4/3 the weight is certainly the size is not really suitable for the system, but you get used to it, the pump zoom, the price could perhaps be a little lower Opinion: Before writing this review of mine I tested it for more than a month, in fact the results came after using it for at least a few days, The first impression it gave me is the quality on the entire focal length, I had already heard discordant opinions at the longer focal lengths and I immediately tried my hand at the maximum focal range, I have always used the monopod with all long focal lengths, but I have also done handheld tests, and the quality appeared excellent to me, I also own the 300f4 and the 150-400f4.5 and from my comparative tests it does not differ much from these two super optics, I put it just below not so much for the quality of sharpness, But for the operability that the pros have wider apertures and consequently you can use the lower iso, a lens to master well it takes a bit of use but that can give great satisfaction, I will definitely put other files here on Juza so you can realize its quality. sent on June 24, 2024 |
![]() | Olympus M.Zuiko 150-400mm f/4.5 TC1.25x IS Pro Pros: lightness and portability, build quality, excellent image quality, dual 8 EV stabilization, integrated focal multiplier, ability to mount 1.4X-2X multipliers, MAF storage button. Cons: absolutely none Opinion: for a few days now I have had this jewel of unique lens of its kind, immediately from the first images I realized that I have in my hands an excellent lens, even the M1X immediately appeared more responsive and precise in focus, in a moment I can pass with a lever in charge of 800mm equivalent to 1000mm f5.6 with a stabilization that can also be used freehand with unexpected times , three-dimensionality at the highest levels the colors of the images are more full-bodied and with linear nuances, a lens that can be used by the macro sport and bird tourism for its minimum focus distance that is 1.30cm, sets a new standard of its kind. sent on April 20, 2021 |
![]() | Olympus OM-D E-M1 III Pros: Precise and responsive autofocus, cluttered weight ergonomics, improved quality, stabilization that is unparalleled, 50 mega free hand HI-RIS shot in raw, ND filter, multi selector now present, Cons: Nothing Opinion: immediately I noticed a marked improvement from the M1 II both in the operating speed both in AF and in the cleaner file now having the new processor, this M III is very close to the X that still remains the forefather, now the stabilization reaches 7 stops like the x , the new ND filter is a mana from the sky having the 7-14 now you can use it without filters, what then say the setting AF sky stars even here who practices night photos you will find this really important setting without always having to set to infinite focus that to want lte wrong, who immediately sparred for the few improvements now you have to think again because even the file is improved cleaner the machine always ready and responsive, then the new shutter as has the X 400000 shots in warranty is not little stuff, the body improved even in the to robustness with new seal, I conclude by saying that once again Olympus has made center putting on the market a great car, now for those who travel want so much quality and freedom of movement this is the best choice that there is sent on March 07, 2020 |
![]() | Olympus OM-D E-M1X Pros: Always compact dimensions, stabilization, stunning JPEG files, Olympus colors, excellent AF speed and precision Cons: Nothing Opinion: It ' a month that I own this machine and I must say that every time I use it always amazes me with real files and colors always at the top, a precise and fast AF, usable up to 6400 ISO without many problems, a portability always at the top with a handle that fits you com And a glove, take pictures in high-resolution freehand from RAW from 50 mega, sensor always clean and with a stabilization from 7.5 stop you can make images with really unthinkable times, an integrated filter ND that also a pleasure without having the usual problems of mounting Re filters on the lenses, with the two processors has an impressive execution speed, this E-M1X wants used for a while then you realize its real quality, for me Olympus to made another quality leap, and its money is worth them all. sent on April 01, 2019 |
![]() | Olympus M.Zuiko Digital ED 14-150mm f/4-5.6 II Pros: lightweight versatile, aperture f / 4-5.6 puts it in the middle of all these objectives do, tropical conditions and is resistant to splashes and dust, good image quality, the package also included the hood. Cons: improved in construction, in af paintings not always fast, but still acceptable. Opinion: Olympus to put on the market another update of this 14-150, more modern design and seals with splash and dust, but the construction of the lens remains the same, in my kit lens can not miss a whole do so, for the quality and light weight (about 300g) which gives me mounted on the E-M5dII in my long hikes in the mountains is good for me, combined with the backpack Photo Sport 200 AW in the 8mm fisheye lens Lumix, my vote is 9. sent on December 11, 2015 |
![]() | Olympus M.Zuiko Digital 14-42mm f/3.5-5.6 EZ Pros: very compact, focal length good enough if we look compact, motorized zoom for iVideo, three aspherical lenses, manual focus, good minimum distance of focus, in overall good quality Cons: no hood, no aperture scale. Opinion: I personally took this zoom lens to its compactness, certainly not to the levels of the most renowned professional zoom, but mounted on E.M5 his work he does, then his real death is the Pen, in my long hikes in the mountains I appreciate very much, but even when they are in town to do some shooting street stands out shortly. sent on November 27, 2014 |
![]() | Panasonic Lumix G Fisheye 8mm f/3.5 Pros: excellent sharpness, excellent contrast, reduced weight. Cons: unfortunately being a fisheye sometimes come chromatic aberration, we can not mount the filters, rnih backlight if you are not careful entering flare. Opinion: as a lens not you put it in the kit as a primary and usually you buy the kit quandornuno I almost completed, or if it is used for the occasion but it is almost rnimpossibile find new and cost much, but of those who practice in the kit photo landscape both in urban rnnatura that can not be missed, I am very satisfied and I did not expect rnresa so good with excellent optical quality, is compact in hand with a slight ottimarnrifinitura, definitely recommend it. sent on July 01, 2013 |
![]() | Olympus E-5 Pros: solid body and sealed, the stabilizer reflex, adjustable monitor, effective cleaning of the sensor, direct commands and accessible, powerful built-in flash. Cons: the only fault I could have compared to competing noise at high iso (maybe). Opinion: remains one of the strongest reflex I've tried, file clean with bright colors and real clarity and quality than enough, much better than the E-3 remains practically the same only the body, quoto Eviscerator in his opinion very detailed, and then files that produces both raw jpeg that are already very good without having to do post-production, I consider it a great reflex. sent on September 03, 2011 |
May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me