|
| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
Carlojvan Pellegrini www.juzaphoto.com/p/CarlojvanPellegrini  |
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator. | Nikon AF 80-200 f/2.8 ED D Pros: Construction, Sharpness Cons: I don't really know, maybe the weight but, being really a professional lens in every perspective, you can forgive that too. Opinion: Holding it in your hand you understand that you have a spectacular professional lens, built in other times, made in Japan......, I've said it all! The only flaw is that I didn't buy it earlier; with the D5 it's just a perfect combination. Lens, truly unique for everything: street, portrait, sport. Excellent at f2.8, mind-blowing in sharpness from f3.5 onwards up to f11. The stabilization is absolutely not regretted as it is very balanced and built in an era in which people really cared about the professional and not only on paper or in price. Truly unique; Old yes, heavy yes but stratospheric and to have absolutely. If it was in production from 1998 to 2018 there must be a reason......, lenses like this are no longer built! sent on November 19, 2023 |
 | Tamron SP 70-200mm f/2.8 Di LD Pros: Construction, aesthetics, balance Cons: Lack of tropicalization, stabilization and focus stroke limiter. Opinion: Purchased instead of the Nikon 70/200 f4 VR, built in Thailand, after owning the top, for others, Nikon 70/200 f2.8 VR, I must say that it is an excellent lens with an amazing value for money. I read about speed problems for AF, not suitable for sports photography; looking in the Sports gallery, the photos of Philip Mok, I realize that, if I achieve similar results, for me it would be more than fine. Tested on planes on landing, it's fine at the moment. I have it for too little to say more, but from the first photos I consider it suitable for me. I reserve the right to post more, positive or negative, when I have tried it on outdoor courts or in gyms. For now it is a pleasure to have it. Sorry to intrude sent on August 18, 2023 |
 | Sigma 24-105mm f/4 DG OS HSM Art Pros: With my Nikon D3 an unbeatable pairing! Finally a plastic-free lens, entirely in metal and made in Japan and not in China or Malaysia; Nikon, LEARN! Taking it in hand you understand right away that you have to deal with something serious. Other than Nikon, it costs almost half of the equivalent................ Cons: Not having bought it before Opinion: Really good stabilization; AF rapid, precise, no mistake a shot; It's a real blade. Used indoors or outdoors, little changes; If I need one more stop, just play on the ISO. Sharply, for me, superior to the Nikon 24/120 F4, tried and held for a few days as mushy and not pleasing to my liking. When I make a portrait, freehand, Croppando the file, I can count the hair of the subject. Too bad I didn't buy it before. I can compare it to the Zeiss I have on the Sony RX10 M3 and which I am very satisfied. A great goal, heavy, but very valuable. Other than Nikon 24/120......... TRY TO BELIEVE. RATED 9.6 sent on May 07, 2019 |
 | Fujifilm XF 50-140mm f/2.8 R LM OIS WR Pros: Incisiveness, it's a razor. MF Fast, balancing Cons: Weight, cost, lens hood Opinion: Already possessor of the Nikon 70/200 is F2,8 that F4, in my opinion, this optics is at least equal if not higher. It's really a pleasure to shoot freehand with a similar IOS. It is a professional lens and like that coast, but worth all the money spent. One of the few lenses that I will never sell. Since I bought it is always mounted on XT1. Highly recommended. sent on March 01, 2019 |
 | Sony RX10 III Pros: It really does everything; very fast focus; sharp lens; focal length, excellent up to 6400 Iso; presence of filters, focal aperture, tropicalization. Cons: The battery is discharged quickly, but with 1-2 reserve, no problem, no external charger and cost of the same Opinion: Exceptional in the street (use the Italian), allows you to steal shots Impossobili, pity the motility of the reduced screen, Zeiss lens a razor, perfect optical zomm, photographing at 600mm and Croppando in PP, you have amazing results, I never leave it, Despite the generous mole, at home. It's worth the money, so many, it costs, besides how you spend eating. Proverbs don't err. Good investment. Really glad, at last sent on September 05, 2018 |
 | Sony RX10 Mark IV Pros: Sony Rx10Mark III: really does everything; very fast focus; sharp lens; focal length, excellent up to 6400 Iso; filter presence Cons: The battery is discharged quickly, but with 1-2 reserve, no problem, no external charger and cost of the same Opinion: Exceptional in the street (use Italian), allows you to steal impossible shots, pity the motility of the reduced screen, Zeiss lens a razor, perfect optical zomm, photographing at 600mm and Croppando in PP, you have amazing results, I never leave it, Despite the generous mole, at home. It's worth the money, so many, it costs, besides how you spend eating. Proverbs don't err. Good investment. Really happy at last! sent on September 05, 2018 |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
