|
| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
Nicola C www.juzaphoto.com/p/Nicola_C  |
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator. | Tamron 15-30mm f/2.8 VC USD Pros: Nurturing, Stabilization, fast and accurate Af Cons: Nothing relevant, just a bit plasticous the barrel Opinion: I've been promoted to full marks ... after nearly a year of use I can only talk about it well. I use it with D750 and come from Nikon 16-35 f4. The difference is enormous, not so much like sharpness, almost identical, maybe better TA at the edges than Nikon, but as a rendered and chromatic loyalty. It's less contrasted with Nikon's tones more delicate but engraved as it is at the same time. It resolves significantly better than the 24 Mpx of the D750. It weighs a bit more than 16-35, but x me is not a problem. There is no tropicalization, but honestly I used it under zero, with the snow and the rain without problems ... Never wrong One shot, never disappointed.rnReceived, this review is made after almost a year of use in the most varied situations.rnThank you very much.rn agree with who said that it's a 16 or 15 ... this is true unfortunately .. We say it's a 15 and a half ... One note in my opinion is a bit stoned of this fantastic lens.rnrn sent on July 25, 2017 |
 | Nikon D700 Pros: The D700 and 'a great machine, not miss a shot, it seems immortal. Give files that are a delight for the eyes, the board of top Nikon lenses go with it and the level becomes altissimo.rn Cons: No one, perhaps the viewfinder coverage to 95% but you get used to. Opinion: This camera and 'crazy, it seems that Nikon has created the perfect machine. The 12 megapixel are perfect in 90% of cases, the body has all the keys to the place, and 'a pleasure to hold. A tank that you will 'fall in love with her. Required to good up to ISO 6400. compratene long as there are around, even with 40/50 thousand shots if kept well, take it without problems, she will not disappoint '.. rn sent on October 16, 2015 |
 | Nikon AF-S 16-35mm f/4 G ED VR Pros: Zoom range, sharpness, possibility to mount filters Cons: The edges are not the best of Fx Opinion: Lens with satisfaction that use of Fx, excellent zoom range, excellent stabilizer, even if it almost never use, excellent sharpness already 'in the TA centro.rnI edges are its only flaw, even at small apertures does not reach a level Sharpness acceptable professional level, however accettabilissimo level amatoriale.rnLa construction and 'plasticky, but well made, I quietly photographed with rain and hail with no fuss. They mount filters 77, as in all the objectives of high-end Nikon.rnConsigliato also on Dx, where 'the lens more' suitable x street, and where you have a good level of sharpness even on the extreme borders already 'in TA .rnrn sent on September 18, 2015 |
 | Nikon AF-S 24-70mm f/2.8 G ED Pros: construction, made from f5.6, afs Cons: from a perspective of this level it is expected the maximum Opinion: Taken x replace the Tamron 24-70 Vr, I used both on D7100 that of d700. It has a good yield from f2.8 to f4, good from f5.6 to f 11.rnSe compared to Tamron has an excellent construction and a fast afs, but as made there a lot of difference. The lack of vr on Fx is not felt, on the other hand is Right. For a lens of this level and of this price you expect the maximum already 'full aperture, where instead it has a good yield through the middle. The colors are a bit more 'saturated and contrasting, typical of these obiettivi.rnIn conclusion, if you do not try af professional performance and a high level of body you can' safely choose the Tamron, quality 'optical and' almost 'identica.rnIl price, and 'certainly high, but in used are good choices. sent on September 18, 2015 |
 | Sigma 18-35mm f/1.8 DC HSM Art Pros: Crazy, excellent sharpness already 'af 1.8, construction Cons: 18 mm are few Opinion: High levels of sharpness, I use it with D7100 and I from 'very much detail. building great, and 'a pleasure to hold in your hand, very balanced with d7100.L'unica flaw' that 18 mm are few, if it were a 16, guys, would not rivals. rnL'autofocus and 'fast and quiet, do not miss a shot, the colors that returns are very real and vivi.rn sent on February 17, 2015 |
 | Nikon D7100 Pros: Body, manageability, tropicalization Cons: Sensor demanding, you have to accompany her only quality lenses Opinion: That is, if you come from the consumer world and you switch to this reflex, it makes a substantial jump. It 'a semi pro advanced, with pro features and it shows in every way. Robustness, weather sealing, double ring, functions and commands. Rich images dettagli.rnIl sensor, however, must be accompanied by high quality lenses, otherwise it makes as it should in most if not exposed properly, you risk retrieving the image to bring out a lot of rumore.rnInsomma, a thoroughbred tame, but once it happens repays of 'Good investimento.rnTenuta at high ISO up to 1600 .. raw file heavy. sent on January 21, 2015 |
 | Tamron 24-70mm f/2.8 Di VC USD Pros: Sharpness, af Central precise color rendering Cons: Weight, materials a bit plasticky Opinion: D7100 goes on 'and that' a marvel, clear already at 2.8, to the best of itself between f4 and f 11. On dx does not distort and does not guarantee Italian vignetta.Con worth everything costa.Una lens respectable, for amateurs do not give beginners' excellent results even in demanding sensors such as the Nikon D7100. the weight and 'the only known if you want a little sore, and the material a bit plasticky but still solid. Not sealed. sent on January 21, 2015 |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
