|
| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
Seo Photo www.juzaphoto.com/p/SeoPhoto  |
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator. | Sony A7r III Pros: Image quality, file maneuverability, customization, construction Cons: Ineffective sensor stabilizer, ISO sealing, shake and of course the menu Opinion: After years of indecision, on the occasion of the last trip, I decided to return to full frame and the choice fell on this A7RIII(A). I was looking for one thing: image quality. All "modern" technological ammennicles do not interest me. Camera in my opinion built very well, solid and comfortable. It begins to have its years but has nothing to envy to the most modern evolutions, always talking about pure IQ. The generated file is of a crazy elasticity and allows things unthinkable for other cameras. Clearly the weight of the single raw uncompressed is not indifferent but these are things that are already known before buying such a machine. At the iso level I expected a little better, if you want you can pull the neck up to 6400 but we are at the limit in my opinion (and despite all the file remains maneuverable, which is unthinkable for my old apsc) but we are still talking about a very dense sensor. The menus are endless and obviously incomprehensible as per Sony tradition but once mastered you can sew the camera on you and after a long time, I am satisfied with the setting I found. I noticed great ease in generating shake, you have to be very careful. Speaking of the ibis I'm finding it really superfluous. I know that they are not the latest versions but from a first evolution, however, something I expected, instead nothing. Photo shakes at 2-300mm even with super safe times (1/500+) and here I refer to the speech of the shake of before. I really like the viewfinder and it is well readable, I started shooting again from the eyepiece that instead I had completely abandoned on the previous camera (I noticed there is an annoying bug with the switch automatically: sometimes it changes by itself even if there is nothing near the sensor, it is probably too sensitive). You have to get used to the output on the LCD and what is actually the photo on the PC because unlike the usual, the photos seem a bit 'dull on the screen (viewfinder already better), making a direct comparison in the field with Canon R5 the comparison is unequal, Canon in practice already makes you see the post-produced photo in a super saturated display while with this RIII on the field I have always remained a bit 'with doubt about The final result, which then at the PC there is all right. Needless to say, it must be associated with top-level optics. For now I'm having a great time and it perfectly reflects what I was looking for. Rating: 9. sent on May 27, 2023 |
 | Sony FE 16-35mm f/2.8 GM Pros: GMaster quality, construction, speed Cons: If I really have to find one, no stabilization Opinion: GMaster lens wonderful and sharp at all focal lengths, I was skeptical for those who criticized the sharpness at the edges but I can confirm that it is absolutely reliable and sharp at all apertures and focal lengths. Also excellent on important sensors such as A7RIII, it returns all the detail you look for in such a sensor. The cost is not indifferent but the quality is really up to par. Even the af, as much as it may be worth on such a perspective, does not disappoint and is very precise. Tropicalized to be able to shoot in all conditions. In short, the top. Rating: 10 sent on May 27, 2023 |
 | Tamron 70-300mm f/4.5-6.3 Di III RXD Pros: Lightweight, compact, economical Cons: Delicate finish, uncomfortable hood, often approximate af, mediocre sharpness to the extreme Opinion: When looking for a cheap Sony tele for fullframe there are few alternatives and this 70-300 is one of them. For what is my experience, the af is very approximate and sometimes mistakes many times even static subjects in excellent light conditions, especially if they are at a great distance (trivially, a mountain) let's say about 3 or 4 photos out of 10. Very delicate, you mark only to look at it as well as the hood that you have to make him do three or four turns before finding the joint. The optical quality at short and medium focal lengths is not bad either, but if taken to the extreme (300mm all open) it becomes really kneaded and for dense sensors like Ar7III it is not recommended. He saved me several times but after the last trip I decided to give it away to move on to something more serious. If you don't have too many pretensions, that's fine. Rating: 7 sent on May 27, 2023 |
 | Sony FE 16-35mm f/4 ZA OSS Vario Tessar T* Pros: Build quality, compactness and versatility. Cons: Poor edges Opinion: I got to try this lens on the A7RIII and I was not particularly impressed. In relation to the cost (to date about € 800) I would have expected slightly better especially with regard to the edges that are worse than both my old Canon 17-40 (which was not a sample in this area and cost about the same) and the sony 10-18 on apsc. Another thing that struck me and of which I also had confirmation in a review, is that the maximum sharpness is obtained at maximum aperture. closing the diaphragm worsens both at the corners and in the center. In my opinion a lens that does not do justice to the most famous cameras. It is true that it begins to have its years but in my view it cannot be a perspective of 9.2 average vote, not even in relation to the price. Assigned mark: 7. sent on November 08, 2022 |
 | LEE Soft Neutral Density ND 0.9 Pros: Very useful, neutral and good quality. Cons: Cost, material not very noble. Opinion: I have been using these filters for years (2013) and I think they are indispensable for those like me who do not like multiple exhibitions. Taken for full frame at the time, I then brought it even even on mirrorless apsc changing only the adapter ring. Mine has some signs of wear, probably glass would have had a few less but still performs very well its work without dominant or loss of detail. Now there are different manufacturers and various types of filters that were not there before, but lee has always kept up with high quality products. Fundamental. sent on April 20, 2020 |
 | LEE Big Stopper Pros: Construction and packaging. Cons: Net blue dominant. High price. Opinion: I replaced my haida 10 stop with this more modern glass plate big stopper for convenience as I have all slab filters. Very marked blue dominant (all the opposite of my old haida which was magenta) but all in all correctable in post production. It emphasizes in a marked way the vignette on wide angles (in my case Sony 10-18) also with holder and ring W/A original lee. I didn't notice an excessive drop in sharpness. For what it costs I expected a little better honestly. sent on April 20, 2020 |
 | Sony E 10-18mm f/4 OSS Pros: Lightness and compactness, image quality and fast and precise af. Cons: Borders and list price. Opinion: A comfortable optics. Surely it's the adjective that first comes to mind when I think of the 10-18 Sony. Small, very light, it's in your pocket. Before taking it (as new on warehouse at just over 550 euros) I was travelling even lighter with 16-70 and Samyang 12, but it was a continuous optical change, and when you use the filters - adapters is really a break of boxes. So I decided to take this little one that obviously will not replace the Samyang (other thing like general quality and brightness) but it is definitely helping me a lot in the various situations where the 12 mm is too open and serves a few more mm. But even where 12 is too little, because those 2 mm at the bottom are definitely many. The thing that worried me most about this lens was the quality of the image, which instead proves absolutely up to par and well balanced with respect to the type of optics that it is. The aberration is also contained (here it does much better than Sammy). I do not express myself about distortion because I have never understood how to evaluate it and shooting natural landscapes, straight lines I have never seen. After heavy use in my excursions I can point out edges not exactly sharp to all openings. Rating: 8/10 sent on July 02, 2019 |
 | Samyang 12mm f/2.0 NCS CS Pros: Lightweight, small, bright, sharp, economical. Cons: Aberrations and vignetting at large openings. Opinion: There is little to say. The most honest Samyang. Image quality at the top at a low price. There are no alternatives to this fantastic lens at any price. It suffers a bit of chromatic aberrations but they are easily resolved with a click. For the rest there are no defects. Its fantastic brightness assists a lot with mirrorless as my a6000, which are not really monsters in ISO management and can even afford a few nights.rnVoto: 9 sent on September 07, 2017 |
 | Sony Vario-Tessar T* E 16-70mm f/4 ZA OSS Pros: Versatility, constant openness. Cons: Price, build quality, aberration and fall at the edges. Opinion: I use it on a6000 for a couple of months, chosen as most users more for lack of alternatives than for the desire to have it. Taken also used, the price still remains high. The build quality has left me a little puzzled: the dials are not regular and flow little fluid, the painting is very delicate, it is easily marked (hiking use) and is not tropicalized. I do not express myself on whether it is a real Zeiss or not as I have never tried others but I do not think that the average quality of this brand is this. The image yield is good on all the millimeters and at all openings, I did not notice such sharp drops at the edges, at 16mm f4 the thing is a little more noticeable. In short, it is a good zoom all-rounder, the main problem of this lens is the price that does not fully digest its all in all discrete qualities. Optical rating: 7 Rating assigned q/p: 7. Update to two years of use: I confirm about everything reported at the beginning but evaluating better and more thoroughly the optics, the fall at the edges is present as well as an obvious chromatic aberration. Down the optics vote to 7. sent on July 26, 2017 |
 | Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS Pros: Dimensions, stabilizer, versatility. Cons: Unusable at 16mm for vignetting. Dark. Opinion: I do not understand how you can put on sale an item that clearly does not work in the total of its features: a 16mm vignetting is an incredible thing, never seen anything like that. Looks like a vision for another system. That said for the rest, for what it costs to behave discreetly. The AF is fast and the stabilizer does its own. The lens is extremely versatile and compact. Attached to the camera aesthetically it is perfect (but so much). The quality all open is quite poor. Its biggest flaw is the vignetting at 16mm, really marked, even at F8 and fixable in post production only through crop. It's a shame because for the rest of the focal length it's pretty definite and closed a bit the detail is good. Kneads a little with subjects in the distance. Good for what it costs but pity for those 16mm that (to my taste) don't make it an independent lens. sent on March 21, 2017 |
 | Sony A6000 Pros: Size, design, ergonomics, build quality, display, burst, AF, low ISO quality, recoveries, videos. Cons: Yield at high ISO (already at 3200 is in crisis), 1/4000, messed up menu, no input for microphone, timelapse app available for purchase separately. Optical park with few alternatives. Distressed sensor with subjects in the distance, screen not readable in sunlight and rough white balance under certain conditions. Opinion: With the A6000 there was a continuous relationship of love and hate to the point of having sold and bought it twice. The camera is very fast in general, as AF and burst and operation. AF in addition to being fast is also very precise, as well as my old Reflex and maybe even better. The menu I find really complex and in my opinion poorly organized. On the ergonomics nothing to say, it is very comfortable and holds very well in your hand as long as you do not mount disproportionate optics that unbalance the camera. The battery life is not the best, if you shoot a lot does not arrive in the evening. Update after months (years) of more or less intense use: exceptional camera still today (2019), never disappoints, once accustomed to the menu and all its settings, you manage to bring home very satisfactory results; excellent sensor even if it kneads the subjects a little in the distance. Inseparable companion of travel and adventures. Updated rating: 8 sent on March 21, 2017 |
 | Manfrotto 055 X PROB Pros: Strength, height, versatility, and overall quality. Cons: Maybe a little 'heavy. But it is normal ... Opinion: Together with my backpack, the 055XPROB piece is "oldest" of my camera kit. They spend the optics, cameras pass, but he never goes away. He's been really .. all the earth, ice, snow, sea water (confirm the creaking due to salt quoted by Matthew Gasper), rain, but it's always here ready to perform his job perfectly. Never a problem and always fully reliable. One of my best purchases. Sure, in the long run its weight for long hikes is felt. But the effort is fully repaid by the service offered. Recommended. Rated 9 just for the weight, but you could not expect better from a stand in this price range. sent on July 31, 2014 |
 | Canon EF 17-40mm f/4.0 L USM Pros: Price, AF, construction, weather sealing, sharpness in the center, and especially resistance to flare and chromatic contrast. Cons: Sharpen the edges and "light" distortion. Opinion: I have this view since December and I've used it a lot and in various conditions. is bonded to the 5D and not take it off easily. The construction is almost breaking, very solid and compact. The AF is fast and accurate (with all the limitations of the 5D MkII) .. I tested it in the snow, under a waterfall, in the rain, in the earth / dust and after a clean is always as good as new .. The edges are the Achilles heel of this view: they are a bit 'ruined also closing a lot of the diaphragm .. It has a little 'ac and purple fringing but for me it's something irrelevant because in addition to being easily corrected in PP is also very visible if the picture is not cropped .. rnrnStraconsigliato sent on July 12, 2012 |
 | Canon EF 100-400mm f/4.5-5.6 L IS USM Pros: Verastilità and dimensions. AF Good but not great .. Cons: Over all, the sharpness at 400mm TA. Not tropicalized Opinion: I had the 100-400 for a long time and I used it a lot .. My choice fell on this because I was afraid of the lack of IS 400 6.5 .. behold, I am sorry and I sold it for the fact that it is fixed on other levels. If you want a versatile tele 100-400 This [u] is [/ u] the choice to make, there are not any better at a price quite acceptable. The clarity in TA I have never made a fool, indeed, is why I sold it. AF, although fast, is not to the levels of the usual 400 5.6 but it is undoubtedly very good as well as the minimum distance of the fixed maf forgets .. In short, it is a good lens "generic" I was wrong to buy .. sent on July 12, 2012 |
 | Canon EF 400mm f/5.6 L USM Pros: Weight, handling, sharpness, price, speed AF and overall quality Cons: Unique: the lack of IS, it is not necessary as it seems Opinion: Optics nothing short of outstanding. Initially I was undecided whether to take this or the 100-400 and took the Pompone I sold after four months to try this masterpiece of the '90s. There is no comparison, the fixed utilizzabilissimo at room temperature and not have to worry about loss of sharpness. Initially I was a bit 'skeptical about the lack of stabilizer but I wanted to try the same, and his weight instead ensures perfect use even without IS. I'm really happy with this optic. The only thing I noticed is that with the MIA 50D AI SERVO is more difficult to engage the subject with respect to the 100-400 .. Once hooked, however, has not problemi.rn sent on June 14, 2012 |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
