JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).

By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you have read your options regarding cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.

OK, I confirm

You can change in every moment your cookies preferences from the page Cookie Preferences, that can be reached from every page of the website with the link that you find at the bottom of the page; you can also set your preferences directly here

Accept Cookies

Customize

Refuse Cookies

Sony Vario-Tessar T* E 16-70mm f/4 ZA OSS : Specifications and Opinions

Reviews
Lenses
Lenses Sony
Sony Vario-Tessar T* E 16-70mm f/4 ZA OSS

Sony Vario-Tessar T* E 16-70mm f/4 ZA OSS

The Sony Vario-Tessar T* E 16-70mm f/4 ZA OSS is a standard lens for APS-C, manufactured from 2013. The focus is done by Lens AF motor (non-ultrasonic), it has image stabilization. The average price, when it has been added to the JuzaPhoto database, is 631 €;

50 users have given it an average vote of 8.5 out of 10.

MOUNT

This lens is available with the following mounts:

Sony E: this lens is compatible with mirrorless APS-C Sony.

Specifications
Focal lenght	16-70 mm
Angle of view	84 - 23.2° (equivalent to a 24-105mm in Fullframe 24x36mm format)
Format	APS-C
Max. aperture	f/4.0
Aperture blades
Lenses/Groups	16 elements in 12 groups
Min. focus distance	0.35 meters
Reproduction ratio	0.23x
Features
Zoom type	Ring, external
Stabilization	Yes (built in lens)
Focus	Lens AF motor (non-ultrasonic)
Internal Focus	Yes
Built and notes
Tripod ring	No
Extenders	No
Filters	55 mm
Lens hood	Yes, supplied
Weather sealing	No
Weight	308 g
Dimensions	67 x 75 mm
Buy
*Sony Vario-Tessar T E 16-70mm f/4 ZA OSS, buy on Ebay** JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.

Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info)

Reviews

What do you think about this lens?

Do you want add your opinion? You do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!

There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments, join discussions and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 241000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.

The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.

Mggscr

sent on December 09, 2023

Pros: Lightness, construction, overall quality.

Cons: If it had had 10mm more on the tele side it would have been perfect for me.

Opinion: Got used by Rce with 2 years warranty at a great price replaced the 18 135 that I have been using for 2 years. The overall quality is better even if the 70mm sometimes limits me a bit, still satisfied with the purchase. Focal range that, on 90% of occasions, is sufficient with good overall quality. Closed from f8 to f11 returns sharp, detailed images across the entire frame.

Salvatore M

sent on July 21, 2020

Pros: Compact and light, focal excursion, colors.

Cons: A little soft at the edges especially at 24mm. If you use the camera flash, casts its shadow.

Opinion: I bought it with a lot of hesitation, having read miles of conflicting opinions and opinions. I also returned the first copy because it was disavowed and slightly blurred the right side. Compared to the 16-50 in kit the photo looks sharper and more crystal clear, with slightly brighter, bright colors, as if you could see the image through a more transparent glass (and probably it is); you should not think, however, that the differences on the single photo are striking, with a bit of postproduction you can make the photo of 1650 very similar to that of 1670... However, I noticed that very often the photos made with the Zeiss are already beautiful so, you work on it shortly after the shot. The big difference with 16-50 is the largest focal excursion combined with the constant f4, which allows you to make much more fulfilling portraits, or photos of people (children) at greater distance, which often happens (for example at the sea). In summary, taking it as the only lens for a holiday or a day at the seaside, on the whole it has its validity: compact, light, sharp, beautiful colors and excellent three-dimensionality of photos, perfect focal excursion for non-specialist use. Compared to the 18-135, which I did not try, in the landscape I did not want to give up the 16mm. The drop in sharpness at the edges in common use is not limiting: already with the 16-50 in kit, which however is lower, landscape photos printed up to one meter wide are still very sharp, and in the photos to people the problem does not exist. P.S. I found that it is not easy at all to test a target, there are a thousand infinitesimal variables (focus, variations in ambient light, any movements etc.) that can change the result enormously; in the end I hung a sheet of graph paper on the wall and took photos with easel and autofocus, testing in this way however only the sharpness at a short distance. On the photos of landscape at great distance, while using the easel, it takes infinite patience to get reliable evidence and comparisons.

Dal Cero Filippo

sent on August 21, 2019

Pros: Great all-rounder, compact, realistic colors

Cons: price of the new

Opinion: Assuming I'm an amateur, I bought this lens about a month ago. The price of the new is really high, so I was looking to find a good used. Fortunately during the first day it dropped to 639 euros. I bought it right away, also taking advantage of the sony cashback and in the end I paid it 539 euros. The difference from the 16-50 kit lens, in my opinion, is noticeable. At F4 it falls at the edges, but closing f8 also the edges become sharp. The colors it returns are great. One thing I didn't like were the numbers that are painted that, instead, given the list price, I would expect engraved. I am satisfied with the purchase

Moxis

sent on March 13, 2019

Pros: Good handyman, well built, solid, compact

Cons: Serigraphs of the focal scale that are erased. Not fundamental, but sin.

Opinion: Taken used by Rce Padova with Sony at 6500 (new) I'm still exploring the system. I came from Fuji x-T2. At the beginning the previous system regrets (knowledge, habit?) but you have to learn to love the new one that seems to me to be really of excellent quality overall. Beautiful colors and excellent definition. I'm an amateur and, therefore, my opinion is entirely personal.

user157477

sent on February 26, 2019

Pros: Weight, size balanced on a 6500, colours, focal length excursion (equal to 24 105) build quality, Zeiss lenses,

Cons: The price a bit exaggerated but Zeiss is Zeiss

Opinion: It goes around with a 24 105 equivalent from the weight and footprint contained. Well balanced on Alpha 6500, makes it stable to those who have a little big hands, you go around doing almost everything with weights and clutter content compared to Nikon D 7200 \\d 7500 + 16 80 There is no comparison you put in a fanny pack and go. Beautiful colors taken by chance without even wanting it with Alpha 6500 used at a ridiculous price I must admit it is a really nice coupled recommended.

There are 12 more reviews. Show all »

Photos taken with Sony Vario-Tessar T* E 16-70mm f/4 ZA OSS

Lives that cross ... - Prague, Czech Republic

by Juza
76 comments, 20083 views

HI RES 3.8 MP

Okshornan peaks

by Juza
90 comments, 26231 views

HI RES 3.8 MP

The modern Bratislava, abstract, Slovakia

by Juza
82 comments, 16072 views

HI RES 9.6 MP

Icy visions

by Juza
47 comments, 14762 views

HI RES 3.8 MP

Alba near Durdle Door

by Juza
53 comments, 20021 views

HI RES 3.8 MP

Sunrise from the Sass de Stria

by Juza
52 comments, 26877 views

The Meteora monasteries at sunset

by Juza
45 comments, 10664 views

HI RES 3.8 MP

Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info)

Charles Bridge, Prague, Czech Republic

by Juza
47 comments, 17702 views

HI RES 3.8 MP

Godafoss in winter

by Juza
32 comments, 10878 views

HI RES 3.8 MP

Self-timer

by Juza
42 comments, 11213 views

HI RES 3.8 MP

Castelul de Lut

by Juza
42 comments, 9737 views

HI RES 3.8 MP

Sunrise from Lagazuoi

by Juza
38 comments, 24236 views

Sunrise from the shelter Codai

by Juza
32 comments, 21666 views

Selfoss

by Juza
23 comments, 7759 views

HI RES 3.8 MP

Explosion of water!

by Juza
17 comments, 8464 views

HI RES 3.8 MP

Waves at Sunset

by Juza
32 comments, 6331 views

HI RES 3.8 MP

Balea Lake

by Juza
40 comments, 7318 views

HI RES 3.8 MP

An underground world

by Juza
52 comments, 8485 views

HI RES 3.8 MP

Sunset colors

by Juza
20 comments, 10108 views

HI RES 3.8 MP

Jamming - Prague, Czech Republic

by Juza
30 comments, 10243 views

HI RES 3.8 MP

Hamn i Senja

by Juza
29 comments, 10745 views

HI RES 3.8 MP

A warm light and enveloping ...

by Juza
24 comments, 7840 views

HI RES 3.8 MP

Vulcanii Noroi? I

by Juza
35 comments, 5615 views

HI RES 3.8 MP

The road to Passo Giau

by Juza
43 comments, 7731 views

HI RES 3.8 MP

Sunset at Reynisfjara

by Juza
37 comments, 6076 views

HI RES 3.8 MP

Rainbow Skogafoss

by Juza
19 comments, 8164 views

HI RES 3.8 MP

The monasteries of Meteora

by Juza
43 comments, 8223 views

HI RES 3.8 MP

Photographing Senjia

by Juza
19 comments, 8249 views

HI RES 3.8 MP

Sunset on Poplars

by Francesco.Santullo
162 comments, 4662 views

HI RES 5.1 MP

Casino ruined Constanta, Romania

by Juza
23 comments, 9535 views

HI RES 3.8 MP

Sunset on the Sassolungo

by Juza
35 comments, 7495 views

HI RES 3.8 MP

Riisitunturi, icy spell

by Juza
16 comments, 6194 views

HI RES 3.8 MP

Riisitunturi, the frozen forest

by Juza
27 comments, 8008 views

HI RES 3.8 MP

Funes Valley

by Juza
38 comments, 8989 views

HI RES 3.8 MP

Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info)

Pietra Perduca, autumn colors

by Juza
40 comments, 6972 views

HI RES 3.8 MP

The street

by Juza
37 comments, 7111 views

HI RES 3.8 MP

Peles Castle

by Juza
30 comments, 6554 views

HI RES 3.8 MP

The sample photos are selected automatically between all photos posted by JuzaPhoto members, using the camera and the lens selected in the techs. If you find evident errors (e.g. photos taken with cameras and lenses that are not available yet), you can contribute to improve the page by sending a private message to the user that has entered incorrect values in the photo caption.

Reviews » Lenses » Lenses Sony » Sony Vario-Tessar T* E 16-70mm f/4 ZA OSS

Sony Vario-Tessar T* E 16-70mm f/4 ZA OSS : Specifications and Opinions

Buy

Offerte Usato RCE

Reviews

What do you think about this lens?

Photos taken with Sony Vario-Tessar T* E 16-70mm f/4 ZA OSS