|
| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
Golfinho203 www.juzaphoto.com/p/Golfinho203  |
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator. | Canon PowerShot S110 Pros: Body robust, compact wide-angle 24 mm (equivalent), menu full and clear functions, optical stabilizer, build quality, WiFi, GPS, sharpness. Cons: Flash motorized located under the left index Opinion: After the premature "funeral" of the PowerShot S 100 I was replaced as the PS S 110. A "real" digital agenda in some occosioni does not regret the camera. The advantages of the wide-angle 24 mm are unsurpassed, specialemte the narrow places. The colors are gorgeous and Raw jpg derived from the 110 are spectacular. In manual mode you have full mastery of the results with a viewfinder full of information worthy of machines of high rank. Unmatched built-in bubble level that prevents shooting wrong. Small defects of Attica 24/120 are easily removed in Camera Raw. From a compact so you can not chiere more "miracles." I highly recommend it to anyone who can not shoot with bulky cameras that give too much attention. sent on December 05, 2013 |
 | Canon EF 20mm f/2.8 USM Pros: Construction, color, distortion, internal focusing Cons: Poor quality at the edges Opinion: I have this view for a long time, now replaced by the Canon EF 24-105 L. He never got to the lack of correction of the edges. Of course, the project is affected by the pre-digital design. Indestructible and with a wide viewing angle. The quality of the materials is high and the presence of plastic material is somewhat limited. The focus is internal, and the front lens does not rotate. You must use the polarizers very thin to avoid including the edges of the filter in the picture. sent on October 19, 2011 |
 | Canon EF 28-135mm f/3.5-5.6 IS USM Pros: Range focal handyman on a FF Cons: The front piece dancing in the barrel. A bit plasticky, dust and hair. dim Opinion: The Canon EF 28-135 IS USM I was never convinced. The photo at the edges are "frayed". Even stopping down the situation improves. the only value is the stabilizer. Mounted on the 5D file returns soft and blurry, especially at 135 mm. Dim. Should be noted that mounted on the 7D produces amazing results. Razor sharp detail, great colors and high contrast .. amazing, a different perspective .. sent on October 12, 2011 |
 | Canon EF 100mm f/2.8 Macro USM Pros: Solid construction, well finished, inner fire, sharpness and contrast, no distortion and chromatic aberration. Cons: Nothing Opinion: Mainly use this lens for studio portraits and reproductions. The color quality is at the highest level. The distortion is absent. The USM motor is very quiet and veloce.I colors are fantastic and free of chromatic aberration. The quality / price ratio is unbeatable. Indispensable selector distances focussed. Another jewel by Canon. sent on October 09, 2011 |
 | Canon EF 300mm f/4.0 L IS USM Pros: Optics of the series "L". Excellent construction. Internal focusing. Special lenses, adjustable collar stand. Cons: Light flare in backlit more motivated. Opinion: The 300 4 / L worth all the money spent. Even at full aperture produces rich files and contrasted. Mounted on a FF produces blurred fabulous. Enough light. Building good and strong (hey, it belongs to the family "L"). Beautiful white color and the thin red line. Autofocus and stabilizing a bit noisy but accurate and reliable. Adjusting the stabilizer of two positions. Built-in hood (not lost). Does not lose value over time. sent on October 05, 2011 |
 | Canon EF 50mm f/1.4 USM Pros: Very sharp, exciting colors, bright Cons: Suffers from a slight distortion, digests bad backlighting Opinion: Are related to Canon products for a lifetime. The 50 mm FD did not suffer the flare as the EF. Objective "life-saving" excellent in extreme low light situations. Good and sturdy construction, offered at an affordable price. Currently I use a little since I adopted zoom EF 24/105 L. I imagine a fifty with stabilizer .. what could be done .. Canon has heard? sent on October 05, 2011 |
 | Canon EF 24-105mm f/4 L IS USM Pros: Professional construction, image quality, stabilized, tropicalized Cons: Cartoon wide open Opinion: I got to try over the years the evolution of this extraordinary optics. Early models suffered heavy flare in backlit more motivated. Fortunately, in the current version (2011) this defect was considerably attenuated. Optical extraordinary that replaced many lenses, fixed focal, in my bag. The incredible work done by the stabilizer that has allowed me many times to shoot at very low ambient light and time. Color and contrast at the highest levels. Sharp images from the center to the edges. sent on October 04, 2011 |
 | Canon 5D Pros: Full-frame sensor, robustness, image quality, huge park accessories Cons: Dust infiltration, detachment of the mirror, limited buffer Opinion: I have the Canon 5D since 2006 and practically still running like a Swiss watch. I only had the detachment of the mirror, now fixed with two metal tabs. I find the shots nuanced and highly detailed. Work mainly low to medium ISO and if I push too much noise appears. The images have an incredible quality still holds the comparison with the 5D SLR modern. I feel the lack of an effective system for the removal of dust but otherwise is a wonderful machine. Before you change the model would be able to test the quality of the future 5D Mark III. sent on September 10, 2011 |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
