|
| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
Ithopios www.juzaphoto.com/p/Ithopios  |
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator. | Zeiss ZE/ZF.2 Planar T* 85mm f/1.4 Pros: Exemplary construction, solidity transmitted to the photographer. Cons: F1.4 weak. F2 could do it and there would be no problems. The choice is left to the user Opinion: I find the 85mm the right cut for the portrait. In my opinion it does give the best of itself to f2.8. The 85mm length can be used both indoors and outdoors. It's heavy: I use Canon EOS and i feel it on the machine. Sewing with this lens is a pleasure, although at maximum openings the lack of sharpness does not help. It gives satisfaction and this leaves everything else in the background. sent on August 31, 2019 |
 | Samyang 14mm f/2.8 IF ED UMC Aspherical Pros: costly price, possibility to mount plate filters with the same Samyang adapter at a good price Cons: ring unstable distances, in my opinion not very clear up to f5.6, canon does not have the chip exif and this is the biggest defect, crystal hood Opinion: from the last comment of other users: "Against: Light distortion on apsc (being a opt for ff)" rncasomai will be the opposite. on apsc cuts the edges will then be more "straight" the line ... rnrnper me is a great landscape goal, manual focus is not a problem. rnse had the chip (on canon) would be easier to handle. rnrnil hood is really awful. they could put it removable. it breaks very easily and can not be replaced by itself. sent on November 01, 2017 |
 | Sigma 85mm f/1.4 EX DG HSM Pros: price-quality image ratio Cons: slow af that struggles with low light Opinion: For use in the studio is great, it gave me nice satisfactions. The blurry is pleasant, the colors although slightly cold do not displease me. In the past I had the 85 1.8 of Canon, this Sigma is superior and much like image quality. But Autofocus Canon is something else. If photographed mainly non-static subjects is everything. sent on February 05, 2017 |
 | Tamron SP 85mm f/1.8 Di VC USD Pros: price stabilized, weather sealed, clear Cons: a little 'flat in the rendering Opinion: I tested this lens, which also ponder the purchase, however, lacks the magic and nikon lens canon 85.rnla sharpness is incredible, almost like that of the sigma 50 1.4 art, however does not give me the joy sperata.rnsicuramente allows to carry on home photos almost always, af reattivo.rnperò precise and, at the time the I prefer the 135 f2 Canon (canon 85 has a 1.2 af too slow for me). rnse stabilizer I would become necessary a lens to be attached to 135 (for the next 85 hours 1.8) .rnrnrn sent on August 31, 2016 |
 | Meyer Gorlitz Trioplan 100mm f/2.8 Pros: sfucato with dream bubbles effect Cons: average price for a used almost 70 years ago Opinion: the uniqueness it pays, but considering that Meyer was back on its feet for the production of this model, I'd rather spend more and get a new: rnhttp: //www.meyer-optik-goerlitz.com/kickstarter_/rnrnp. s. I also had the zebra pattern is not at all the same and also has a very modest sharpness rispello the gray metal model sent on August 16, 2016 |
 | Canon EF 200mm f/2.8 L II USM Pros: Image Quality, Boken, construction, price, color rendering, lens hood and enclosure supplied Cons: Not relevant Opinion: It's an exceptional goal, which I recommend to everyone. To use for photos of sports all right, with quick times he's worthily. The Af is fast enough and also hooks up quickly. Excellent for laid portraits to which this lens is not overly sharp looks dedicated. If you like the focal length of 200mm or with the zoom 70-200 taken more or less always at maximum extension, ensures quality photos with a weight more than halved. sent on November 09, 2015 |
 | Canon EF 35mm f/2 IS USM Pros: from f2.8 it is higher as sharpness and image quality to 35 and sigma canon F1.4. Cons: the hood is mandatory, I'd rather have it as standard paying a little 'more than taking it apart. Opinion: I have to take it sold: canon 40 2.8 .stm, canon 50 1.8 ii, 24-70 2.8 sigma. I gained something and find myself a lens magnifico.non hesitate to take it (I have benefited from the cash back of 60euro), which once again makes me prefer canon in any other brand. I find no flaws, some say that it is heavy, you have never had a heavy lens? RNE generous in size, this is because in focusing on the internal mechanism is extended. the exterior is a kind of frame to hide this thing. It has become my favorite handyman, the alternate only 100 f2.rnse look tests DXO Mark are the first two goals of the canon in the standings and I can only confermare.rn sent on October 25, 2015 |
 | Sigma 105mm f/2.8 Macro DG OS HSM Pros: stabilized, excellent focal length of FF, crisp, pleasant blur Cons: dimensions, not weather sealed, poorly suited to portrait but good for scenes with multiple subjects (especially if moving). Opinion: for the fact that it is not tropicalized I do not think it suitable for professional use. More than the weight is the size to be a counter because it did not ring for tripod and unbalances the car tilted (that is the use for which it is born). I would hope that the later had the ring and tropicalizzazione.rnPuò be valid also for the sport as it accepts the multipliers and stabilizzato.rnSe the steel used to life indoors, is the choice perfetta.rnQualcuno supports both tropical conditions, but only the barrel is. sent on June 02, 2015 |
 | Sigma 150-600mm f/5-6.3 DG OS HSM S Pros: big excursion Focal, a bit 'dark, but if taken during the day is not a big problem with the modern reflex that manage very well the iso. Cons: Absolutely not recommended for sports. rnVelocità autofocus too slow, almost one second. Good for static subjects and basta.rn Opinion: The rapid reduction in price (it is just over 1000EUR) would shout all'affare.rnLa price reduction is caused by the slowness of the HSM system that reduces the range of use. Council on 70-200 (also is not) to match with the multiplier has an Af lightning with the 2x.rnNon suitable for use professionale.rn sent on May 28, 2015 |
 | Nikon D610 Pros: Great RAW files, low noise, headphone output for audio in the video, the possibility to use it as APS-C. Focus continues. Compact size. Built-in flash. Double SD slot. Cons: all AF points in the center and neighbors. The ability to use it as an APS-C is due to the fact that has the same AF system of the D7100 and then in the larger part of the sensor (compared to the D7100) no points of focus. No wifi. No GPS. Opinion: It 'an extraordinary machine that has a long life of many years, there is everything you need, even for video.rnSulla paper is higher than both the Canon 6d that the Canon 5D MkIII. In some points of view, even the D800 Nikon.rnPerchè on the podium at TIPA Awords there is over the canon 6d? rnhttp: //www.saggiamente.com/2013/05/06/tipa-awards-2013-canon-dslr-wins-on-nikon/ sent on August 14, 2014 |
 | Canon 6D Pros: Accuracy and speed central point. Wifi. GPS. Excellent file without post production. Cons: Only af central good, the lack of flash excludes the possibility of controlling studio flash (the 600d has it ... They might put it). Slow in the burst. Missing the headphone output for video. Opinion: Unlike when declared by experienced users of this forum, I have to say that the central point of the AF is accurate and sensitive. Rest even more appalled by the fact that experts in the condition of focus difficult, instead of focusing in manual, take another machine in hand ... How long it takes these couples to enter into the Church? RnrnResta the fact for photos of sport (depending on the sport) may not be suitable. Not good for cars, bikes, maybe even a bike, but I do in rugby, football, volleyball and basketball I found bene.rnrnLa recommend to everyone, for still life in particular, I found there are well. rnrnBuona light. sent on August 13, 2014 |
 | Canon EF 85mm f/1.8 USM Pros: Price, boken, weight, dimensions Cons: 1.8 Sharpness poor, good 2.8 with the peak at the f4.0rnManca paralucernAf not eccelsornCostruzione unprofessional Opinion: Less than the Canon 100 f2, but it also costs almost 200 euros in meno.Su APSC is more manageable as a focal point. For concerts instead is short, better 100 or better yet 135 f2. I've had it for a test for a period of amico.rnVa good for portraits at weddings to capture expressions naturali.rnAnche for street I used it and I did not feel bad. A professional, however, would not take this ottica.rnBuona for an amateur or entry level cameras. sent on August 12, 2014 |
 | Canon EF 100mm f/2.0 USM Pros: Blurred, color, weight, size Cons: Price (I've paid 420euro new, but on amazon costs 540euro, too!), Lens hood is not supplied, in front of a beautiful boken is a little sharpness. Opinion: Also possess the 105 sigma OS.rnCome sharpness the Sigma is higher and molto.rnPerò weighs more and is less maneuverable. Blurred Sigma not pleasant. rnrnSul Canon I find that this model is not widespread because 85 1.8 costs almost 200 euros less (prices amazon) .rnIl 100 F2 is greater than 85 but not worth the 200 euros of difference. rnrnTengo sigma that is why I have two Canon bodies. The sigma accept the use of multipliers, and APSC while on a Canon 5d. sent on August 12, 2014 |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
