|
| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
Fiorenzo Giovannelli www.juzaphoto.com/p/FiorenzoGiovannelli  |
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator. | Kingston Ultimate CF 32 GB 600x (90 MB/s) Pros: Fast and reliable. Cons: I found none. Opinion: I have two that I use Canon 7D, with gust to 10 frames per second in RAW, (shooting exclusively in this format) run shots to concerts Blues / Rock and cardsi bears endless sequences of shots without flinching and never stop dead, I always stop the sequence, well before the buffer say enough ... until now acquistavo Sandisk, but with those benefits spend nearly twice ... in time I learned to appreciate the design features of this brand, I'd like Kingston were measured in the field pro, as does for some SD card ... it is certain that whatever it is, these are excellent and CF svenarti not have to buy them. sent on August 13, 2015 |
 | Canon EF 17-40mm f/4.0 L USM Pros: All Over Cons: Nothing. Opinion: And 'my second optical L (I also have the 70/200), is excellent on both APSC On FF. those that are described by some as defects .... vignetting and less sharpness are absolutely absent on 'APSC and perfectly "normal" on FF. where, no optics is free from these "really small problems" 16/35 to 2.8 I used often before buying the 17/40, is affected to an extent far more serious ... yet defined good .. . I would not like it because it costs twice?!?! Buy it and you have a lens that is worth more than what it costs ... will give you the satisfaction that not even imagine ... sent on January 18, 2015 |
 | Canon 6D Pros: a car, finally no frills, with only what you need really. Outstanding performance, files "aseptic" in all conditions! Cons: Still a chance to make movies ... you decide to do with that option models apart ... then the odious SD card and to conclude the festival futility, WI-FI and JPS. Opinion: Developed to "do" photo practical and robust: a device in which, quality, simplicity, intuitiveness to the flight are the main dish, if they really want to make it perfect, take away the above, do make at least 7-8 fps and will render useless all the top models .... quiet .... they will not have a market to defend .... anyway who wants to hear, let him hear! sent on January 17, 2015 |
 | Canon 40D Pros: All you really need, no unnecessary frills .... Cons: limited sensitivity in high, although at that time, to have more, you had to go to class in a single number ... Opinion: Beautiful machine, tireless, even though born after 50, was able to do better if not in detail, at least for me, a little importanti.L 'bought in the fall of 2007. I've used it in all conditions, spremendola, especially with the gusts, (I am a fan of concerts Blues / Rock ...) and with high ISO! I have always made beautiful photos without resorting to tricks in post, to try to cover the possible sensor noise ... and indeed, except in extreme situations, I always considered acceptable work of this sensor! Impeccable with sensitivity ranging from 100/400 Iso. It must be said, that I: DIE! Visions to monitor, I was never satisfied, it is clear that use it, because digital does not allow you to do without it. But (I think this applies to all machines) the strengths and weaknesses of evidence only with a professional printing, which unlike the monitor, not "throw" anything away .... rnTornando the car: This year in June, at the beginning of a job, (but I always Commons, as tll think ...) it appeared the famous warning Err.99, Canon sent assistance, he was diagnosed, the shutter to be replaced, including the tax and freight quote is only 150.00 Euro, given the approval after a week, has returned to my faithful 40 repaired. Set the shutter old (so I could appreciate the complexity ... a true gem of electromechanical!). rnil report! He credited the old shutter well: 277 826 shots! Before handing .... Canon quell'otturatore guaranteed for 100,000 shots! I would have never thought, not even remotely, scoring all of those shots, I'm happy, because the car has gone far beyond my expectations, even the most optimistic .... the performance is flawless and the photos taken with L lenses are magnificent, a little less with those objectives Efs ... proving that with excellent goals, the machines show less its limits, the 3200 Iso made with optical 17/40 L are very, very good ... while the 3200 with 17/85 sono lot different, but still usabilissimi .... Ultimately an excellent machine that gave me a lot of satisfaction and I hope to continue ... sent on January 11, 2014 |
 | Canon 7D Pros: ALL Cons: NOTHING, if not at least for me, the unnecessary presence of the possibility of making movies: if I loved film, I would have bought a device specific ... Opinion: my 7D, I replaced it with a 5mkII ... do not cry foul, but in short, for my needs, was much more powerful the 7 ... which, with the same demands on my part, has met many more parameters, than it did the 5 .... rncon the optical L there is a higher yield by 7, which is not the same mounted on 5 at least for those in my possession (70/200 f4 and 17/40 f4), I forgot for about 6 months, I had them both ... so I comparisons were possible on the field! The noise of the sensor is excellent and allows the creation of files of quality (who makes this kind of picture, discern the concept of quality in a particularly difficult given by lights Dancers ... and never abundant, however, with large imbalances, which know really put the whip systems photometric cameras ...) even at 6400 ISO, which are often needed in concerts Blues / Rock visceral passion of mine ... but the files, "to be printed" only print quality isable to allow a "radiography"! What also underlined below from "Uespone." The watch file to the screen (even on the best Pc), does not make ... and anyway you look at my pictures, the guitarist of all shots 6400iso, however in the same print are even better, try to credere.Inoltre the burst at 8 fps is indispensable: it is mechanically flawless ... the feeling of solidity is palapabile. Last but not least, the use of memory card "CF" if the canon read .... I highly recommend not to replace these cards with "SD" real "stop" electronic also on other machines (at least on Reflex) but rather, how does Nikon make, enter the double slot! In my experience, (I have a photo shop) is frequent, mechanical malfunction and the precariousness of this type of support ... even those of a "rank" and never had any problems with CF, even with the most "scacione" ... rnChe say more, than a car that is already present on the marketto believe since 2009 and never been non'è giubilata by subsequent versions, as it has been for other models, (the Eos 5 itself to make an example ...) who had doubts sull'acquistarla or less, do it without delay, aware of having purchased a car exceptional ... I'll be amply rewarded. sent on January 05, 2014 |
 | Canon EF 70-200mm f/4.0 L USM Pros: Optical exceptional! for clarity, ease of handling, compattezza.Alcuni they consider the 70/200 f4 best ever, even within the family Canon. Cons: Lack collar series, the lack of a real case .... the bag does not increase the desire that makes ... Opinion: I use it on all occasions that require the use of the tele, but I was able to test it thoroughly use in concerts Blues / Rock, my other ball ... the quality is given by exceptional clarity even at full aperture , concerts very often this is the fixed aperture, beautiful colors ... beautiful, saturated as, from the old "diapositivaro" like me! Well balanced and in my case, free from the useless gimmick (I speak for myself) is that the IS, which will significantly raise the cost but the sharpness in my opinion suffers the negative influence: less choppy, but the definition in debt for now ... I'm lucky to be able to push a free hand in times imroponibili later .... who knows?!?! ***** rnrn add a short comment further, after an intense year of use .. ..and I do specifically about the 'IS: I confirm, as the lack of frills this is a thing well done, a mechanical complication in addition, a cost maggiore.utilità, all from dimostrare.rn sent on November 15, 2013 |
 | Canon EF-S 10-22mm f/3.5-4.5 USM Pros: absence of geometric distortions (focal priority in this type ....) RNAF eccellenternNitidezza! Cons: vignetting (although compatible for the focal length in game) rndotazione poor, no lens hood as standard, no case. Opinion: To me that I often have to deal with architectural photos, this is almost indispensable .... I could appreciate the maneuverability, precision in focus, and a virtual absence of geometric distortion, which will exempt from a long period of post ... the color saturation is at the top, the excellent sharpness, what about if you do not advise ... because in APSC format, the choice non'è wide, but this point of view, does not regret the lack of choice. sent on November 14, 2013 |
 | Canon EF-S 15-85mm f/3.5-5.6 IS USM Pros: Sharpness, compactness, high weight (yes, I personally appreciate the heaviness of the optics in terms of stability ...) since I do not use it ever stabilizer ... very good quality. Cons: Dearth: for the price should have been standard lens hood and pouch ... rnVignettatura ... Opinion: As others have pointed out, is definitely the best kit lens supplied with APSC.la strength is remarkable and excellent sharpness, especially compared to the 17/85 they were before, as standard, than I do and I can say I own 2 copies which are not comparable ... the only flaw is a showy and a little vignetting 'geometric distortion too, (but that only 10 years ago would have been considered excellent in that focal "24mm"). vignetting is possible defects to find on the perspective of this category, the easiest (today) to be corrected, and this makes it acceptable, the construction is sturdy and while not weather sealed for now it seems to me, (I own it since 2011) behaves well with the input dust ... Water has taken (certainly not rain) often, but it does not seem to be affected (clearly I've always dried as soon as possible ...) in the end, while feeling the lack of a lens of this type, in "L" version , and I do not see why not being projettate for the APSC?!?! 15/85 is a great goal, which gave me great satisfaction, even in the pro field. sent on November 14, 2013 |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
