|
| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
Adrianogattoni www.juzaphoto.com/p/Adrianogattoni  |
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator. | Panasonic Lumix G Vario 14-140mm f/3.5-5.6 ASPH OIS II Pros: Weight, definition, footprint and stabilization Cons: I don't know for the cost at which it is used Opinion: I bought this used lens as new at € 280 on Ebay to match it as an all-round lens to my Panasonic G9 and I must say that I was surprised in a positive sense by the quality that this lens releases. Since it arrived it is practically attached to my camera and with the help of the double stabilization system you can take home excellent shots even with very long times. Other positive features are the performance of the AF and the possibility of making close-ups given the reduced focusing distance. I recommend buying apart from the hood that is not provided alone, at least in my case it happened like this. Compared with the other all do Panasonic 12-60 I must say that it does not disfigure in the slightest. Finally, what to say if not recommend it to owners of micro 4/3 systems who want to turn light while maintaining versatility of use. sent on May 29, 2023 |
 | Sony A7r II Pros: Overall build quality, sensor quality and available functionality Cons: Poor battery life, single memory slot and AFC management Opinion: Purchased in early 2020 to complement it with the Nikon D810, I must say that the files it churns out are even better than those that the D810 produces both for the ease of processing and for the quality that they have especially at high ISOs. Also used with the Commlite Pro V6 adapter, it allows me to use all my Nikon G optics with performance almost similar to the original. It's definitely not a machine suitable for sports photos or photo hunting, for these uses there are definitely better performing machines. The AF works very well even at low lights and with native optics there is also the functionality of eye AF. Used with both native optics and adapted optics, it churns out extremely sharp rows especially in landscape photos and portraiture. It can be used quietly as an all-round camera even in travel reporting. Because I chose Sony instead of the Nikon Z7, because in the face of similar performance, I have a more mature system, with a greater choice of native optics and which today is located at much lower cost than the Z7. Having to use optics adapted with similar performance, you might as well use them with an adapter towards a more mature and complete system. sent on January 31, 2020 |
 | Nikon AF-S DX 16-85mm f/3.5-5.6 G ED VR Pros: Optics still built with Nikon's healthy old criteria Cons: slightly dark but fully usable. A little flare in the pushed backlights. Opinion: Purchased used by Rebuy with 3-year warranty for my Nikon D500 instead of the sigma 17-70 that it replaced great, not only for the best wide-angle focal excursion and canvas side. It produces a well-defined image with saturated and contrasting colors. It does not have the brightness or treatment of the most recent brother but the figure to which it is proposed is definitely a best buy. The images produced in my opinion are definitely superior to the Sigma that I proceeded to sell after testing for over a month the new optics. In my view it goes well with the D500 both as the af response speed and as an overall yield. Very recommended, as they say, in the old barrel there is good wine. sent on December 24, 2019 |
 | Huawei P20 Pro Pros: Innovation, photographic quality especially in night photos, very good sensor dedicated to B/W and battery autonomy Cons: Too intrusive automatisms to be taken under control. Front camera does not live up to the rear lenses Opinion: Purchased after reading numerous pro and cons threads. It is not the phone that can totally replace the reflex but certainly in different situations it defends very well. It's a phone that, given the innovative solutions it has, requires a bit of learning to be used at best, is definitely not a point and shoot. Its strengths are the 40 mpixel sensor, the optics It features and the image management system developed with the Leica engineers. The quality of the results is seen especially in the night photo where it allows to shoot freehand even in low light situations and with remarkable results. The raw file in DNG format requires a bit of processing on the color shades and vignetting but can produce good results in terms of detail. In different situations of shooting jpegs, beautiful ready. Compared to my previous phone LG 4 is a remarkable generational leap. In some cases the software of which it is equipped can be too invasive but this can be remedied or eliminating the correction made or working on the parameters made available by the stock Chamber supplied. The latter developed on the characteristics of the phone, contrary to what others have written, for me it enhances the quality of the hardware. Also the intermediate lens that allows a 3x optical magnification, does its dirty work: Practically a pocket bridge finally general qualities like Smarphone to the top. Autonomy, after a full charge that is carried out in about 90 minutes, about two days of mixed use of voice and data. The Android version of which is equipped is a customized version of Android 8.1. Last icing on the cake purchased as a Wind customer at €460, €100 in advance and 30 installments of €12 per month without interest. sent on September 01, 2018 |
 | Nikon AF 20mm f/2.8 D Pros: Great detail and beautiful color rendering Cons: Autofocus governed only by the camera body. Poor tightness in the backlighting Opinion: Purchased this lens especially for its lightness and compactness, I was amazed by its performance even on a demanding camera such as the D810. The photos produced by this pair are sharp and with bright colors, especially on shades of blue. Like all the optics of the Afd series, I suffer a little backlighting and does not have a hyper reactive AF. In any case recommended if you love light and defined wide-angle lenses. sent on January 16, 2018 |
 | Nikon D7200 Pros: AF characteristics, machine body, responsiveness and performance Cons: Nothing to report Opinion: Purchased used from a friend passed to the ML system with only 100 shots to 'active support to my Nikon D610 as a second camera body and action pictures and photo hunting, I was pleasantly surprised to performance and image quality, higher the D7100 which has maintained the quality and reduce defects. Like the D750, I think the car all round the offer of Nikon DX sent on December 16, 2016 |
 | Fujifilm X-E2 Pros: Picture quality at high ISO, optical quality at an affordable cost, discrete autofocus. Excellent image definition and color management. Weight and dimensions Cons: battery life, autofocus slower than a reflex, less feeling in the management of the body Opinion: I took this camera kit with 18-55, for its size and for the curiosity to try the sensor x-trans, I must say that the quality of the photos produced has gone beyond my expectations. I come from a Nikon D7100 and I still have it and use a Sony A6000 downgraded to a machine for shooting video, activities in which I believe is unsurpassed, and as a car for family use. I must say from the very first shots that the quality of RAF files produced by X-E2 is, in my opinion, superior to that produced by both the D7100 is the sony A6000, although the latter machines with a 24 megapixel sensor. The sensor x-trans that is attached to the fuji, in my opinion, is superior to detail, color management, and especially for low noise at high ISO. Even the camera body is sturdy and well-made though not weather sealed and recalls the old analog machines rangefinder. The electronic viewfinder is just great! I purchased along with 18-55 a 27 mm / 2.8 pancake that makes the machine truly pocket. The purchase of fuji, given the quality of photos produced, for now I have convinced you to postpone the transition to FF. There are still some known defects of the system such as ML autofocus slightly slower in difficult lighting conditions, a lower overall responsiveness than the SLR, a park dedicated optics, though quality is not extended as the park optical nikon or canon, that defects in the 'I have also seen in other Sony A6000. In any case, the machine is usable with a bit of foresight in 100% of cases. I took photos of the stormy sea at 23 pm at 6400 ISO with a quality management of the noise significantly higher than the one I got with the nikon or with the sony in similar circumstances. sent on March 09, 2015 |
 | Fujifilm XC 50-230mm f/4.5-6.7 OIS II Pros: Sharpness and quality of color reproduction, good stabilizer and autofocus Cons: slightly dark Opinion: I purchased this light to match it to an X-E2, I chose the zoom tele less expensive both to complete the kit is because for my kind of photos do not often use the tele. I must say that from the first test shots show an optical quality that surprised me is the clarity, both for color fidelity. Even the built-in autofocus and stabilizer do not disappoint. Does not have the build quality of the more expensive big brother but also has a weight and greater portability and is at a price that is 1/3 of the older brother, and after all the final quality is not bad. Then some adjustment in less kind lack of aperture ring and the ability to disable the stabilizer only menu. Brightness is undoubtedly its weak point but when you consider that with the X-Trans sensor you can get detailed photos and clean even at high ISO, it can be assumed that the quality of the sensor at high ISO allows me to recover 1 or 2 stop in less than luminosity. Be highly recommended to those who want to approach the Fuji system without fainting. sent on March 09, 2015 |
 | Samyang 85mm f/1.4 Aspherical IF Pros: Cost, build quality, sharpness, brightness and good focus Cons: lacks autofocus, some problem in the backlight. Opinion: I purchased the Samyang 85 1.4 nikon mount and use it with adapter on a sony A6000. For me it is a very good optics, modern design, bright, crisp and with a good focus. One of the reasons that prompted me to purchase, in addition to clarity, cost and the focus has been the presence of the ring baffles me that facilitates use with sony A6000. With the Nikon 7100 I have no problem because the microchip that is attached helps quite in focus. And 'course, a lens from portrait and then is specialized for this function and requires a minimum of care in the management of focus and the pdc. sent on February 20, 2015 |
 | Nikon AF-S 24-85mm f/3.5-4.5 G ED VR Pros: Light, very defined in the central area, affordable cost Cons: is not an optical pro Opinion: Who buys this lens already know that does not belong to the pro line and the price is confirmed. Personally I use it with a D7100 and I had no particular problems with neither the speed nor autofocus with VR, only caveat is to use shutter speeds a little more rapid than those canons, for this density sensor and D7100 for the lack of the optical low pass filter. I have not had a chance to compare it with the 24-120, but the evidence read on the internet does not seem to have anything to envy the big brother. Without considering buying a kit, but buying as a single optical judge this view better from the standpoint of quality and price compared to 24-120. Beyond the appearance plasticky in practical optics is well made and without any particular problems of operation. sent on November 27, 2014 |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
