|
| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
Francesco Artistico Fotografia www.juzaphoto.com/p/FrancescoArtisticoFotografia  |
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator. | Sigma 24-35mm f/2.0 DG HSM Art Pros: wonderful sharpness, beautiful colors, qualities that reflect the ART Sigma series Cons: It 'a middle way not easy to accept, since it is very limited from 24 to 35. A bit of distortion to 24mm. Opinion: I upgrade my opinion after 1 month of utilizzo.rnQuesta lens is impressive ... the quality is wonderful. For F2, great, but to really see the wonders, close to f2.8, and you'll end color pictures, sharpness, really extraordinary impact. It 'a quality identical to the fixed Article 50 and 85. The only cons is not obviously have to stop more to F1.4. It is still undecided whether to keep it or directly use Article 35 F1.4. Only that happen, especially in the ceremonial, the need to fly a shorter focal, and have the opportunity to go down to 24 mm without changing lens is a great convenience. sent on January 28, 2017 |
 | Sigma 50mm f/1.4 DG HSM Art Pros: Crystal clear, beautiful colors, nice contrast, beautiful bokeh Cons: on rare occasions a mistake I autofocus, a little heavy, on my Nikon D750 I had to calibrate it with the end of adjustment +20 Opinion: For some time they recensivano good of all this fabulous 50mm. So I decided to take it too, having already bought the 85 art, and as wonderful colors dava.rnSono was very astonished by the sharpness at f1.4 !! The tones are warmer than my Nikon lenses. The autofocus wrong occasionally (1 of 10 pictures), but at least it rapido.rnIl bokeh is beautiful ... perhaps the most beautiful I've seen so far. rnTrovato on amazon to 700 €. For the moment, I think it was the right spending. I hope it will give me great satisfaction. sent on January 28, 2017 |
 | Sigma 85mm f/1.4 DG HSM Art Pros: Sharpness, speed and precision maf, robustness, yield colors, blurred Cons: heavy, too bulky, ring focus too big (I'm afraid that might inadvertently move it with the hand that used to hold the lens, thus changing the little maf), Nikon D750 you have to calibrate the maf, slightly higher cost (about € 1,000 it was already a better price) Opinion: F100, otherwise you will micromosso.rnIn all cases, it is a lens that would totally recommend, but unfortunately the price is not exactly light: D sent on December 08, 2016 |
 | Nikon AF-S 17-35mm f/2.8 D ED Pros: Crystal-clear (from F4 on), beautiful colors, good maf. Cons: If shooting in 35mm of persons, f2.8 known some softness. Opinion: Bought used 500 €. I honestly did not expect a great quality, and instead has much colpito.Un I bit soft at f2.8, that known only by taking photos of a person (as a landscape I have still a good sharpness). They told me that sometimes the focus is a whistle, but in my case I had no problems. I have rarely that the focus has the wrong size, but it may be that this depended more from the camera body (D600) and not from the lens. sent on November 02, 2016 |
 | Nikon AF-S 24-120mm f/4 G ED VR Pros: Crisp, Maf fast and accurate, good stabilization, focal length to 120mm (minimum focusing distance very small fire). Cons: A little less crisp than 120 mm; the rubber of the zoom ring has widened after two years of use. Opinion: A wonderful lens, perfect all-rounder for the ceremonial photograph. A 120 mm can focus on objects very close to the lens, resulting in a pleasant sfocato.rnOttimo stabilizer, with which I can shoot well enough to 24mm up to 1/3 of a second. rnSorprendente focusing, very precise and rapid. rnOggi its price is very good. Highly recommended. sent on November 02, 2016 |
 | Samyang 14mm f/2.8 IF ED UMC Aspherical Pros: Excellent construction, focus ring is easy to manage; nice wide field angle, excellent brightness, negligible aberrations, glare resistant. Affordable price. Cons: Excessive deformation. Maf manual, but easy to manage. Sharpness good, but in some shots I was not overly impressed. Only for nikonisti, it costs more than the model compatible for canon. Opinion: I absolutely could not afford any 14 mm. Luckily there is the Samyang that achieves good targets at reasonable prices. Maybe I have not made the most of this light, but for the moment I have not seen a crazy sharpness. The manual focus at this focal length is a breeze. Shame about the deformations too strong (corrected in Camera Raw, but I do not know if you can do better with more expensive lenses). All in all, it is the best 14 mm for value for money. Recommended to all. sent on July 12, 2013 |
 | Samyang 85mm f/1.4 Aspherical IF Pros: Really cheap price, high sharpness ratio / price, excellent ring focus, bokeh (blur) outstanding at f1, 4, good strength of the lens. Cons: It takes a lot of patience to handle the right focus at wide apertures, sharpness is good, but not to the levels of nikkor; really poor lens cap, lens hood small and I would say almost useless. Strong chromatic aberrations at f1, 4. Opinion: I bought this lens buying it used for about 2 years. Paid € 180 in good condition, so I would say a great deal. The manual focus is difficult to handle in portraits (it takes a lot of patience to focus on the eyes), but all in all for only 180 € it was worth it, because the great quality of the bokeh gives you some great photos like a pro. Honestly, if I had to pay € 330 to get it again, maybe I would have left it alone, and I would have invested more about nikkor 85 f1, 8. I had the opening f1, 4, but about 450 € I got a great sharpness and excellent autofocus. But get him used to 180 € I think it was a good investment. So I would recommend to buy it used, so as to gradually enter into the world of lenses for portraits, and one day then switch to a more professional as the sigma or nikon (but nikon 85 f1, 4 well costs 1500 €, then you owe them think of it). RNAs my opinion, I can not recommend buying a new one. Or take used, and Pagatand less than 250 €, or should a lot more to buy the nikkor 85mm f1, 8 G, which as I said before, the only flaw of not having the opening at f1, 4, but you have maf automatic and great quality of the lenses nikon.rn rn sent on June 07, 2013 |
 | Sigma 70-200mm f/2.8 EX DG OS HSM Pros: Cheap price, focus much faster, less heavy than I expected, very good lens hood, rugged, stabilizer 2 modes of use, ring stand very stable. Cons: Sharpness good, but not to the levels of nikon and canon. It is not sealed. Fast Focus, but not always precise, minimum distance of focusing too long. Opinion: I purchased the excellent price of 890 € this lens on e-bay (from a store in Germany, which is called "fotomarkt"). The structure, construction and design immediately made me a good effect. The focus is very fast, although occasionally goes a little in doubt in finding the right point of maf, but nothing grave.rnStabilizzatore tested up to 3 stops of times less, and I must say that the result was positive. It is not heavy, but not even a feather. Perhaps the only thing I was a little disappointed, but that was to be expected given the price really cheap, it's sharpness. Having tested over the 70-200 f2, 8 Nikkor, unfortunately I noticed a difference, but with a bit of post production are achieved, however some nice fotografie.rnPer the price at which I found it, I'm quite satisfied. Shell out € 2,500 for nikon instead of 890 € for a bit of extra quality is not worth all this price difference, so I recommend to fans :) sent on May 30, 2013 |
 | Samsung Galaxy Note I Pros: Much more changeable than the iphone. Good camera, excellent photos and videos, outstanding quality of the screen Cons: Too big, and sometimes goes a little into chaos if you do not restart for a long time. Opinion: Juza is a forum for photography, so my review will focus primarily on the camera. Given that I am for Android (because they offer more than one preference and application management than the other), I think it's a great phone. Just a little off, but in the pocket of my camera enters benissimo.rnLa the evening of course we can not expect much. But the day may surprise you. Takes pictures really nice, comparable to those of a compact. Also if you put manually focus on an object close to the lens, can also create a small but lovely sfondo.rnDi blurred in the evening, however, are also able to take good photos to my friends using the (let's call it) "built-in flash" ) sent on March 08, 2013 |
 | Nikon AF-S DX 18-105mm f/3.5-5.6 G ED VR Pros: Excellent wide-angle and zoom in a single lens, good sharpness, not too expensive, stabilizer. Cons: A little heavy, dim, little zoom drive (if you have to take a picture up to maximum focal length, the zomm it down slowly). Opinion: It 'was my first lens ever, held for the nikon d3100.rnIl great advantage is to have both an excellent wide-angle and a good zoom 105mm.rnSe be honest, I have never served a focal length greater than 105mm. I would like to have the 18-200mm but it costs too much. This however is at a lower price abbordabile.rnE 'dim, then suffer in dark environments, especially if the body is not high, because raising the iso is very noticeable the rumore.rnBuona thing is the presence of the stabilizer, even if it is of the highest quality (I just felt a little its contribution in the shots in low times). rnTutto in all, I consider it a good lens for entry-level quality / price ratio, much better than the 18-55 that comes out usually attached to macchina.rnrnLo advice then to newcomers in the world of photography :) sent on January 09, 2013 |
 | Nikon AF-S 50mm f/1.8 G Pros: Very light, good price, good hood, great sharpness, excellent photographs. Cons: Af a bit noisy, but there are no defects of great importance Opinion: Once attached to the body, it seems that there is so much that is lightweight. The photos are really beautiful, the blur is one of the best I've seen so far ora.rnPersonalmente, the only thing a bit annoying is the focus noisy that gives me problems only if I want to shoot some video (you can hear the very noise). But here the priority is to take pictures: D so real defects until now I have not trovati.rnCredo that is one of the most important objectives to keep :) rnEro interested in the f 1.4 version but the price is too high! ! I think f 1.8 goes just fine :) rnQuindi the COUNCIL TO ALL :) sent on January 07, 2013 |
 | Nikon D600 Pros: Compact, economical, high performance, excellent viewfinder, no noise at high ISO, the ability to have many professional features in a camera body top of the line is not too expensive. Cons: 1) SPOTS ON SENSOR: in the early models, and unfortunately it happened to me, the sensor becomes dirty with dust or oil very easily, unfortunately spots visible on the image. Then solved in manutenzione.rn2) White Balance to green (not a problem ... just adjust it manually from the machine or in post-production). RN3) Absence of the shutter speed 1/8000 (not a tragedy ... 1 / 4000 is more than enough). 4) Points autofocus too central, but a real photographer you should not complain about this little against hihihi XDrn Opinion: 7 was defined as the entry-level for the full frame. Allow me to criticize this statement. It 'a car from € 2000, is by no means an entry-level. It has many automatic settings for those who does not understand photography, but I think it is a mistake crazy to spend € 2,000 to buy a car to use in AUTOMATIC ... I think a beginner using an automatic means to exploit D600 only 20% of its full potential. It 's like buying a Ferrari and only use it to go shopping in the city: P. Hence it is advisable for people who have at least a minimum of theoretical knowledge and practical use of reflex. Per a machine that level, I felt it rational not to buy the 24-85 (since dim), but make a small sacrifice more to buy an objective and professional light, choose the 24-70 f / 2,8 Tamron's (really great and especially economic ... and is the only sector with a stabilizer, unlike the nikkor and sigma). rnrnrnHo found it verynice handle, the fantastic high-definition screen, the location of the keys. Maybe I expected a little more for the duration of batteria.rnrnL 'I found it ideal for my case, since I am a student of engineering and therefore time photographer free (for work). Buy a D800 or a D4 would be impossible for my pockets. The D600 is perfect because I can finally use a full frame at reasonable prices. sent on January 03, 2013 |
 | Tamron 24-70mm f/2.8 Di VC USD Pros: Perfect clarity, even at RT. Price contenuto.rnStabilizzatore really great (shooting up to 1/3 of a second to 70mm blur-free). RnBuona and fast focusing. Silenzioso.rn Cons: A little heavy, maybe a little small hood; distortion at 24 mm. Slight vignetting at 24 mm f2.8 Opinion: Having a nikon d600, I was inclined to buy the nikon 24-70. Only seeing the price (well minimum € 1,800) and considering the fact that it was very cumbersome and even without the stabilizer, I went to look at the sigma and tamron. For some € 100 plus the Tamron was equipped with stabilizer unlike the sigma, so it was worth spending a little more, and the choice proved successful. I tried to take photos of 2 time 1/2 of a second focal length 50mm. The first without stabilizer, the second with it on. The result has left me speechless. Although I had a very steady hand, the first move is coming, but with the stabilizer I got a photo perfectly stable and clear: DrnSi feels much weight, and unfortunately there is distortion at the minimum focal length. But compared to other brands and prices, I think it is the most convenient target. sent on December 29, 2012 |
 | Nikon D3100 Pros: Excellent value for money. Very leggera.rnLunga battery life. Beautiful pictures with an external flash. Cons: Already visible noise at 1600 iso. Low screen resolution. Only 11 points of focus. Only a command dial. Poor quality in photos at night using the built-in flash. Opinion: It 'was my first SLR, with which I entered the world of fotografia.rnDirei that to begin to practice, is one of the best entry-level. The advice for those who does not understand photography and for those who want to start practicing. After 1 year of experience, I have now started to notice its limitations, as already visible noise at 1600 ISO, the presence of only 11 AF points, the low resolution of the screen with which I did not always have a clear idea of ??how it was coming the photo. Pictures taken at night with the built-in flash have always given me excellent results, but the use of an external flash professional I still did get good pictures for photo simple (in local festivals for example). Now made the necessary practice, I passed the professional use of full frame (going to the nikon d600), but it is still worthy to be my body spare machine in my photo shoots: D sent on December 29, 2012 |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
