|
| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
Ascell www.juzaphoto.com/p/Ascell  |
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator. | Olympus M.Zuiko Digital ED 75-300mm f/4.8-6.7 II Pros: compactness, focal length, sharpness Cons: Brightness Opinion: Bought used at €350, it allows you with a content outlay to get to 600mm eq. I took it for shots of fauna in the mountains and on holiday, which otherwise I could not do. The quality is good (good up to about 250mm, then you need to close one stop). It is exceptionally light and compact to have such an excursion and very convenient to have always with you. A little dark at the maximum focal, but in line with the cost. In good light returns phenomenal shots, which also in sharpness are fine (the more the subject is far less will be sharp, as with all Supertele). It is not immediate to use, but with a bit of practice the results are really good. sent on September 30, 2018 |
 | Panasonic Leica DG Summilux 15mm f/1.7 ASPH Pros: compactness, optical output, character, AF speed, aperture ring Cons: Not detected Opinion: Spectacular target. It produces images with a very special stamp. The blur, although not exaggerated or easy to get (cause sensor M43) is beautiful and very cinematic. Excellent sharpness even at full aperture, it is true that presents a bit of aberration in backlight, but nothing unforgivable or incorrigible view especially the size. Strange focal length, but that made me make peace in my eternal indecision between 28 and 35 equivalents. Coupled with another longer optics (in my case the 45mm, but I'm considering taking the 25 always Panaleica), is a spectacular double to use for anything. sent on September 28, 2018 |
 | Fujifilm XF 18mm f/2 R Pros: Small, bright Cons: Those known: distorts a bit, not sharpest, not very fast Opinion: Great! It's a lens, along with the 35 1.4, so I find the Fuji system perfect (for me). The cons are very well known, all open is not sharpest to the edges and the autofocus is not lightning (albeit fully usable on XT1 and XE3). However it is tiny and bright: I use it as a handyman, if you love the focal 28mm eq you will stick it glued to the machine. The yield, according to my taste, is still very good and well befits a lens from street (for landscape, closed to 5.6 is sharp everywhere). Beautiful blurry and beautiful stamp to the images, the price at which it is used will make many happy. I come from the habit of using the coupled 35-85 (in Canon), in Fuji I discovered and I fell in love with the 28-50 (eq). sent on May 25, 2018 |
 | Fujifilm X-E3 Pros: Very fast, essentiality of use, viewfinder, file quality Cons: Fixed screen, write to SD a little slow Opinion: A spectacular car. I find it beautiful aesthetically and very fast as an autofocus and general responsiveness, the image quality is the usual 24 MP Xtrans (in my opinion excellent). Very ergonomic, more than T20 according to my taste, for the different way of use (I have big hands). Fantastic the side viewfinder, very convenient. If you come from T1 and T2 it is a little small, but excellent and perfectly usable. It's amazing how much they managed to make it small, first reason of my purchase, it is perfect for use in travel/generic/street. Very few keys: it is true that there are touch gestures, but to me they seem a little cumbersome. If you love having everything at the touch of a button, if you are a fan of total minimalism, it is your machine. Let's move on to what can be improved: on-board writing (a little slow even with very fast tabs). Monitor (if they did tiltabile would be my ideal machine). Batteries (one gets used to it, they are in line with the other Fuji). Of course, for the seeker, it doesn't have a stabilizer. Ultimately it is not for everyone, but if you find yourself in the features is a machine that makes you love. Last tip: Choose your pairing, but for me to use it with a pair of fixed is pure delicious! sent on February 21, 2018 |
 | Leica Elmarit-R 90mm f/2.8 Pros: Colors, tonal passages, blurry, building Cons: None (manual fire, but you know about the purchase) Opinion: In my opinion one of the best average vintage portrait canvas and not. The construction is solid and very precise, in Leica style. The fluid and pleasant nuts to use. In terms of yield we are on stratospheric levels: the colors are natural and with a slight contrast, which allows you to have perfect images for easy portraits and workable in post. Tonal passages are something unique, that few targets can give. The sharpness at TA is not at the highest level, it's fine for portraits, while in other areas it is advisable to close at 1 stop. The blur is beautiful, pasty at the right point and able to detach itself decisively and of course the subject, very different from the modern blurry of almost uniform colors. Rn I also tried the brother f2 and, apart from the cost about double, did not convince me of the same Way on blurry. Ultimately, an optic that gives dependence on portrait and if closed a bit great for both details and landscapes. With the plus of being able to find it fairly little on the used (check that the rings are fluid and there are no important buckles) Rating 10 sent on July 19, 2017 |
 | Canon 600D Pros: Economical, great for learning, swiveling screen Cons: High iso, plasticous, Opinion: It was my first car and still I keep it as second body, and we can not get much of it. Taking the current price on the cloth gives great satisfaction. Fantastic swivel screen, where reviewing photos is a pleasure, as image quality is high, but obviously on more modern or more professional machines the difference is noticeable, in particular the maximum ISO usable does not exceed 1600 to avoid the really annoying grain .rnDoes a little bit robust (especially the tiltable screen) but is still built very well. sent on July 19, 2017 |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
