The Fujifilm X-E3 is a mirrorless camera with APS-C (1.5x) sensor and 24 megapixels manufactured from 2017. The range of sensitivities, including ISO extension, is 100 - 51200 ISO and it has a continuous shooting (burst mode) of 14 FPS x 22 RAW, 35 JPEG. The average price, when it has been added to the JuzaPhoto database, is 798 €;
52 users have given it an average vote of 9.4 out of 10
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments, join discussions and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 201000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.
Pros:The usual quality of Fuji: great product for the price range; firmware updates etc.
Cons:As soon as I find them I communicate.
Opinion:Just bought. Very happy owner of the XE2 I decide to add the XE3. The image quality is identical, despite the eight megapixels more, the robustness a little less. More compact than the sister "minor" and therefore lighter. No built-in flash (they give a separate one that feeds with the machine battery) and different menu to familiarize yourself with. Identical autonomy (300/350 shots). I thought about why Fuji churned out the XE3 since there was the 2 and the only answer I gave was that of the touch-sensitive display, still not adjustable. First shots: less "analog" than the XE2. The 24 megapixels are more nervous than the 16 of the XE2 and put vintage or third-party optics more on the rope (I use Nikon fixed optics with adapter: 14mm - 28mm - 50mm - 85mm) removing them from "materiality". Nothing worrying but the difference can be seen in the tonal passages of the B/N. Long story short: is it better to buy the XE3 to replace the XE2? I don't think so: If you already own your younger sister, hold on to it or think about something else.
Pros:Lightness, size, operational speed, jpeg quality, very comfortable touch screen to select fire area with vintage lenses, much improved af, customization possibilities
Cons:A little small, more plastic than the X-E2, lack of built-in flash, 24 mpx without stabilizer raise safety times, AUTO selector absolutely useless.
Opinion:For my virtually perfect use. If you attach a 27 to it, it becomes very small and light, it is placed in the pocket of a jacket; with the MTO 1000 and easel you photograph the moon... I come from X-E2, whose gaps were speed of area-to-area selection, and at the same time. Now with the joystick or, even two moves on the touchscreen, you select the area with a lot of speed, and the Af, at least single, is definitely good. Also improved the af-c, although it is not a sports photo camera. The 24 mpx are definitely less manageable in little light, the difference with the 16 is noticeable in the micromox. If you had the stabilizer for me it would be 10. I love to produce on-camera jpeg from raw, for me they are gorgeous. As for "workability, software" etc., I leave the word to those who understand more than I do. The viewfinder is a little small, but nothing dramatic. The built-in flash, sometimes used for some games with long times, now you have to carry it with you... the only flaws to want to look for them. I can't find a better camera for my needs...
Pros:lightness, files like xt2 and similar processor, all in one hand
Cons:weak buffer for some quick-taken photos or short bursts
Opinion:The xe3 was and is the machine with which the feeling was taken immediately, just tried at a city marathon where I went only to try the fuji material 4 years ago. that trial started with this and two months later I had fuji kit. I use it professionally for both fashion and wedding services and leisure. It's a very good machine. I have big, chubby hands and for convenience I preferred to add a third-party grip to her. The apsc sensor as many will have found does not make you regret a ff for yield. Of course now comparing it to the newest has lagged a little behind but I feel I really recommend it to those who start professionally. low cost, high file quality when used with fixed and bright optics. The iso discourse leaves some time it finds because it depends on how you are used to shooting and for what purpose. I in the studio from this xe3 I printed a 70x 90 taken at 3200 iso and the noise that appeared on video during printing disappeared giving me a very beautiful image of a wedding. If you do anything else, as fashion services well, so much there over 400 very few times go and you will have a nice to do in the post because this machine is so detailed that you will be forced to soften (soften not make wax dolls) the skin of the model. In any case, to return to the previous speech this is a great machine for those who start in any sector or for those in need of a second body. price quality imbattibile.la found with a 35 f1.4 and 3 or 4 spare batteries and a 18-55 now at about 1000 euros (I say with the 18-55 because it's the cheapest optics if you also make videos like me). Video quality from 9.
Pros:Portability, controls, lightness, decentralized viewfinder, discretion, function keys
Cons:Battery life. Touch display. Difficulty in dialogue via APP
Opinion:Taken now for a couple of years to replace the XE-2, I have found a multitude of improvements: starting with the overall quality of the machine, which appears (or is) better built than the previous one. For my photographic genre, around the city is the best you can and by now I would replace it only with a possible XE-4. I find uncomfortable rear wheel being adjusted; In fact, a very slight pressure is enough and passes to the exaltation of the MAF. I completely disabled the rear display because I don't want to see the preview (it's always been so, since I've been digitally I've been photographing) but I wouldn't have used touch that I find uncomfortable instead of an advantage. Fabulous Joystick stick that allows complete control of the MAF and the various functions. Many possibilities of customization.
Opinion:I owned x e1 -xe2 -now xe3 From one to 3 there is a difference to say the least abysmal. The tilting screen in 2020 should be by Law... there are too many situations you need, photos with the car above your head, from the ground, in the street. etc The touch screen is of virtually no use Everything else does not disappoint, rather it does not disappoint for those with large hands.
The sample photos are selected automatically between all photos posted by JuzaPhoto members, using the camera and the lens selected in the techs. If you find evident errors (e.g. photos taken with cameras and lenses that are not available yet), you can contribute to improve the page by sending a private message to the user that has entered incorrect values in the photo caption.