|
| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
Iziomio75 www.juzaphoto.com/p/Iziomio75  |
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator. | Tamron SP 200-500mm f/5-6.3 Di LD Pros: Focal excitement, robustness, weight, image quality Cons: Low, soft TA, no stabilizer, very unbalanced with chromatic aberrations at the highest focal point, especially in backlight Opinion: I'm just using this zoom, the first impression is very good, the quality of the returned images is satisfactory if diaframed over f11 otherwise TA is too soft, if you find it used at a good price take it, the af is slow so In avifauna is useless if not on steady subjects, while in sports genre defends well, 500mm stretches a lot and has no monopod and difficult to handle since it is very unbalanced by the length of the lens, another painful note is the image quality To 500mm that is enough just diaphragming over f11, up to 400mm works dignitously, for the rest is a good lens if you happen to tell it less than 500 coffers, otherwise I recommend migrating to more powerful models.rnVoto 6/7 . sent on May 08, 2017 |
 | Nikon D90 Pros: Robusta with internal motor can also be used with the optical af-d Cons: Autofocus slow and imprecise, value for money Opinion: I've had this camera for a few months, then I switched to the d750, the yield of this reflex is overrated, it's a good car, but it costs too much based on the results offered, with the benefit of the doubt, maybe my copy was defective (bought new), I always used nikon d90 but af this made me mad so much that I sold it after less than a 5 anno.rnVoto sent on April 24, 2017 |
 | Nikon D750 Pros: Construction, held at high iso, tilting screen, wi-fi, weight, robustness, satisfactory internal engine Cons: For now no one Opinion: I own about two years ago this full frame body and consider myself a professional in every respect, coming from a D90 that I did it quench the AF accuracy, this corspo ff compact and tropical conditions can only be strasoddisfatto, the d750 produces magnificent raw files , quick focus but not lightning on optical af-d but otherwise now used is bought well even if it is not cheap, is a body machine with appropriate give you shots superb optics, I do not recommend using optics from kit with F3.5 aperture, you might be disappointed, another highlight is the battery life which is eternal, then the wifi which nikon with the app on your smartphone allows you to send both photos on the fly and use your smartphone as remote trigger, as written by others met resistance at high iSO is impressive, up to 6400 has very little noise, but worse than what is normal, in the film he had the coarse only with 1600isornIn inclusion recommend buying this camera body, 1 vote0 sent on April 23, 2017 |
 | Nikon AF 180mm f/2.8 D ED IF Pros: Sharpness, bokeh, construction quality Nikonrn Cons: Nobody Opinion: I had this wonderful lens for two years, the images are sharp and clean lofty returns, do not think I ever had this standard of optical, sold only to monetize to take the 70-200 2,8vr this lens is magnificent RNLA straconsiglio used costs about 400 € but it is worth them all, it offers a quality that even the modern zoom feature, i think i buy it a giorno.rnVoto 10 sent on April 01, 2017 |
 | Sigma APO 70-200mm f/2.8 EX DG HSM Pros: HSM Autofocus, aesthetics Cons: Everything, zero contrast weight of stabilizer tropicalizzatornAssenza Opinion: I had this zoom for two months, sold out of desperation, suffering from back focus weighs very heavy, although these lenses is normal, the sore point of this now optical dated and exceeded the quality of the mediocre, slow, often having the lenses untreated sufferers magenta casts, under the 125 second if you do not use a monopod is often risks camera shake, under daylight conditions works decently, although much advice Nikon rende.rnOttica coast sconsigliornrnVoto 5 sent on April 01, 2017 |
 | Nikon AF 50mm f/1.8 D Pros: Price, sharpness, optical light and ultra compact Cons: plasticky construction Opinion: It is a virtue extraordinary optic that does not cost anything in relation to the services offered does not even seem to have with it, is a piumarnA TA blurred is good can also be used for portraits because it does not distort, does the construction plasticky but costing so little you can not expect used lies between 50 and 80 coffee is not motorized so it is usable only on SLR with internal motor rnSe can be found in good buy it conditions immediately, being an optical d is less contrasty optics modern grnConsiglio l ' purchase rnVoto 9 sent on April 01, 2017 |
 | Nikon AF 24-85mm f/2.8-4 D IF Pros: focal excursion, value for money, Cons: Weight, only 24mm F2.8 Opinion: It is an honest zoom that saw the price used vehicle is worth buying it on again instead still costs too much, returns clean images and engraving is good, is an amateur optical but good quality the bad thing is that is only 24mm a 2.8 to 50mm F3.3 is really buiornMa 240 cafes you can not expect everything even macro already ds 35mm rnEssendo is an optical repeat honest no frills a bit 'dated and heavy that advice is worth its money rnVoto 7RN sent on April 01, 2017 |
 | Nikon AF-S 70-200mm f/2.8 G ED VR Pros: Construction, focal length optical quality VR Cons: Hood bad, weight autofocus Opinion: professional-grade optics a handyman for a few saw not really affordable price rnL'incisione of this zoom is excellent, vr good and given the weight allows you to go below the safety times to avoid camera shake, autofocus is fast but in conditions low light sometimes does not engage immediately, the lens hood is really hurt as hooking you risk breaking it easily rnPer else is a perspective that straconsiglio, 9 vote sent on April 01, 2017 |
 | Nikon AF 85mm f/1.8 D Pros: Construction, maximum aperture, bokehRapporto money Cons: Hood Screw Opinion: Just purchased immediately gave me a solid impression of the typical old-fashioned NikonrnSto using just this perspective siaper portraits Photography in the street and I must say that my expectations were more than fulfilled, I find it better than the 105mm f2.8 has a soft tone almost soft focus an exceptional bokeh to F1.8 optical old style that I recommend to buy used not regret rnrn sent on April 01, 2017 |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
