|
| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
Antonio Ibraimovic www.juzaphoto.com/p/AntonioIbraimovic  |
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator. | 7Artisans M50mm f/1.1 Pros: Blurry, colors Cons: Terrible, unwatchable edges, this to any diaphragm. Opinion: I took portraits with this lens, I was struck by the Bokeh, and the softness, very pleasant in the portraits. When I started making ourselves genders other than portraiture, with a wider field, I was impressed in a negative sense, with kneaded edges and no detail, this to any diaphragm. I tested this test on Sony A7III. Instead tried on the Leica M240, the glass improves a lot. sent on June 03, 2021 |
 | Yongnuo YN 35mm f/2 Pros: Crisp, price, Cons: Light, a little plastic, today it is also found in the optics Opinion: Taken at 90€, and I am satisfied, sharp at TA in the central area, the colors are Nikon type, it is identical to 50 1.8 afs g, the af is fast and silent, I really like it, I find it to be a successful optics, only time can confirm its resistance. No one's taking me out of my head that she came out of Nikon's factory. With the D800E it feels like having a compact. sent on April 27, 2021 |
 | Sony A7 II Pros: Nothing special Cons: A little bit of everything, the engineer who profiled the color coming out, probably had raised his elbow to dinner Opinion: Machine in general, I find the top a7s in everything , also and above all on a photographic level , with the S the files are delicious as color and shades, they are poetry, with this I tried everything, nothing, Mirrorles nonsense, I review the files and I always remain demoralized, really ugly. Then the whole thing emerges from the photos shown here. I don't have any more words, I keep it just to connect the nikon and vintage optics. sent on October 26, 2020 |
 | Fujifilm X-E1 Pros: Fantastic sensor, light and robust at the same time, beautiful, high iso. Cons: Aim of course not up to the height of the xt3 Opinion: Having had and having the different Fuji Xe1, Xt3( Xpro1-Xpro2-Xe2-Xt1), nothing, what concerns the image quality this little gem churns out the best in the absolute sense. I explain better: I took at the beginning the Xpro 1 , fantastic, only left me puzzled at the iso of 3200,beautiful the grain, but there was, then I matched to the pro1 the XE1 , here I found a cleaner and more full-bodied file, beautiful really in all situations, even at 6400 (which I do not use m (ai) the colors and resolution of the image never gave way by a comma. Over time the series of new XTrans came into the world with more mpx , but here they gave up the beauty of the file, too often I find it artifact, and especially in the XT3 I find the introduction of too much noise, already from 800..... my favorite machine has always been the XPro series(if it had been ff , it would have been definitive, unfortunately marketing among snack friends), I would have hoped for an XPro1s .... personal impressions, for an aps-c I find too much the 24 mpx sent on December 09, 2019 |
 | Voigtlander VM Nokton 35 mm f/1.4 MC Pros: Gorgeous in everything Cons: Nothing Opinion: There are few words, optical mini with so much brilliance, and beautiful in the return of colors, combined with a Leica M9, a ccd FF, it puts its to make everything fantastic. I consider it a little gem. You make portraits with a beautiful and balanced blur, I'm in love with this optics, where put on the Leica is all very compact. sent on July 31, 2019 |
 | Leica M9 / M9-P Pros: Excellent file quality, robust, beautiful, colors. Cons: Monitor Opinion: I have a few months that I have this jewel, taken at a great price due to the sensor not replaced, has some speckle on the sensor, but I prefer to keep it so, replace a sensor in my opinion is not easy and I do not trust, not even from the parent. Wonderful file quality, are very special, I matched 35 Nokton Voight, Zeiss 25, Leica Summicron 90, 135 Tele Elmar, all give excellent results, I think the CCD still says its, pity it was not developed over time. Previously I had the M6, I always liked the Telemtro, I think after a little ' exercise, the MF becomes simple and fast. Too nice to use, you want to always carry it with you, then every shot we find poetry, sensor always very resolute, and depth of excellent color. I just wanted to remind those who have compiled the technical data sheet, that there is only one type of measurement, the central medium, without the possibility of intervening sent on January 19, 2019 |
 | Fujifilm XF 27mm f/2.8 Pros: Image quality, size, price, AF Cons: Nobody Opinion: Optics delicious, with a lot of personality, TA works very well, F4 is a blade, really small and well built, clutter of zero, without diaphragms on the body, I find it more immediate to select them on the front wheel. I find AF a bit noisy but very fast, due to the smoothness of the optics, very close focus, since you can make portraits very tight. It has to be in a Fuji kit, because it is not a normal 50, that you often stay long, or a 35 where you can find yourself wide, maybe the 40 is a real street optics. sent on January 05, 2019 |
 | Nikon AF-S 16-35mm f/4 G ED VR Pros: Sharpness across the field, rugged, VR, front diameter for filters Cons: 16 correctable Distortion, if you do architecture Opinion: Taken to mount it on DF and D810, and immediately I noticed that it was a great zoom, for landscapes and street is the best that you can have, at all Apermi I find the optics in question excellent, has no particular sagging, I found to TA the extreme edges read more morbid I, but not in an egregious manner. In weddings, I noticed that I use in a very high percentage of the 16 -35, both for excellent quality and because it encloses the focal range most important for photography, the last VR where for me it really makes sense, so you can shoot with lower times , and keep the lower ISO, this Nikon works great. Beautiful lens also in the construction and especially in the various fields of employment, which are many, in the landscape is essential. sent on November 22, 2018 |
 | Sigma 24-35mm f/2.0 DG HSM Art Pros: Excellent image quality, excellent construction, nice to see. Cons: Weight from zoom 70-200 2.8 Opinion: Sci-fi quality at all diaphragms and focal lengths. I use the above optics on Nikon DF and D810, and it is stratospheric in resolution and colors, always balanced. However, if I came back I would not make a similar purchase, I'm considering to take lenses dated type the fixed AfD 24,28,35, very compact and light, the same quality, today I do not understand why we tend to lighten the cameras and weigh the optics, Mahhhh, Mystery of sales. sent on August 24, 2018 |
 | Tokina AT-X 16-28mm f/2.8 Pro FX Pros: Beautiful colors, crisp, old fashioned tank. Cons: Flareeeeeee, Autofocus uncertain. Opinion: I bought the optics in question recently, the enthusiasm I got off quickly after having made night shots with lateral lanterns, very arrears, I do not know how it was possible but the lens absorbed them all in a way hungry, creating real pallets, ruining all the photos .... autofocus at night, very uncertain, indeed with the night seems to hang, I'm very sorry .... because the colors and sharpness are great. sent on November 05, 2017 |
 | Nikon AF 20mm f/2.8 D Pros: Sharpness, compact, great on board Cons: Anything Opinion: Wonderful optics, colors that reflect reality, without surpassing how the new generations, with the D800E, become sublime, a widescreen ultrasound that is in a pocket, I gave it a nd nd 1000 Haida slim filter, there is little to add. .. must have, in the used, it is at a tedious price.Do keep it in your pocket, to those who love this focus sent on June 20, 2017 |
 | Olympus M.Zuiko Digital 14-42mm f/3.5-5.6 II R Pros: Picccolo, great solution, fine optics very fine edges like the center. Cons: It is so delicious that I can not find it Opinion: Taken recently for 80 € with the OM D EM5, by NOCT, and I'm happy with the choice, they go with the Nikon, and I completely abandon the Fuji system, too digital monster for me, here the format is smaller than the Apsc , But I find more picture quality, beautiful and balanced colors, every shot I find beautiful and eye-catching, then the Olympus optics are small and surgical, of an exhilarating beauty, and above all at the right price and not exotic, unlike Fuji, optics with prices down to their level of quality, which I always found to be low average (they worked better on vintage optics) ... sorry we wasted money. Olympus 14-42 excellent and balanced, I joined him 40-150 and 45 1.8. sent on May 27, 2017 |
 | Fujifilm X-T1 Pros: Well constructed, beautiful to look at, so many JPEG filters Cons: Files most artifacts, high sensitivities there is a lot of cleaning, unfortunately I find them too planed, I always get the impression that the camera put the hands of the raf. Opinion: Camera bellissima, unfortunately I can't digest files it produces, are always very strange artifacts, in portraits they look waxy, landscapes, I find a few grades and steps in the colors ... are probably not very personal impressions all fail to love the photos that churn out the Fuji with x trans ... too bad for real, beautiful to see and take pictures. The sensor with special lights breaks down creating real Buckshot of flare. sent on May 14, 2017 |
 | Nikon AF 135mm f/2 D DC Pros: Sharpness at TA, closing becomes devastating for the beauty that returns, construction of another era Cons: For a few, especially those that go behind the marketing, the contrast and color, such as LCD televisions. Opinion: Beautiful it all opened shutting ,, there is a small improvement, from optical portrait par excellence, beautiful blurred, if put in good hands with the DC ring will make photos magistrali.Ottica difficult to define, not the words you would find, however masterpiece mechanical, optical, nothing to do with the modern optics, where there is so much contrast and color and so much plastic, then you are suffering in post production, to remove the Unsharp mask insita.Con these optical dating is everything and more in the right place ... the only flaw I found, is not for everyone, especially those that go behind the fashions and taken tests here and there. sent on February 28, 2017 |
 | Nikon Df Pros: Excellent quality of the sensor, color perfectly balanced, beautiful, all the controls in the right place, excellent ergonomics Cons: Missing illuminator af Opinion: Taken six months ago, it was always my ball, you are working as expected, fantastic, files that come out are three-dimensional, and the colors are real and very particular, have a special timbre, always very balanced with .... ais, the reference of the ball is improved in accuracy, with the D800 the focus point does not often coincide. af perfect for my needs, the only drawback is probably the af illuminator, in the dark would be helpful, however, I made a photo of the concerts I have had great difficulty ..... I see it is never dropped price, hope remains only .... what to say more, a "masterpiece" sent on October 25, 2016 |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
