|
| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
Glazkopf www.juzaphoto.com/p/Glazkopf  |
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator. | Yongnuo YN 35mm f/2 Pros: price and weight Cons: quality and various problems. Opinion: Purchased for online flotion. Paid 90 euros. Used a few times and I find it interesting. The focus works discreetly in the central part... at the edges he suffers a little. It's the third one I buy because the first two gave me serious problems of closing diaphragm (they kept the lens at f2 even when the reflex sent the signal to close). In practice, in AV, he always kept F2 but, when the times lengthened because the body "thought" that it had a different opening, the photos were burned. I think the quality of the lens depends on the luck of finding a "good" match and not failed. I use this lens on a Canon 1DSmk3 and 1Dmk4. sent on October 31, 2019 |
| Yongnuo YN 35mm f/2 Pros: price and weight Cons: quality and various problems. Opinion: Purchased for online flotion. Paid 90 euros. Used a few times and I find it interesting. The focus works discreetly in the central part... at the edges he suffers a little. It's the third one I buy because the first two gave me serious problems of closing diaphragm (they kept the lens at f2 even when the reflex sent the signal to close). In practice, in AV, he always kept F2 but, when the times lengthened because the body "thought" that it had a different opening, the photos were burned. I think the quality of the lens depends on the luck of finding a "good" match and not failed. I use this lens on a Canon 1DSmk3 and 1Dmk4. sent on October 31, 2019 |
 | Canon 1D Mark IV Pros: shooting speed, ergonomics, focus, battery life. Cons: I haven't found any at the moment. Opinion: I've been looking for a used one in good condition for a long time. I joined it with a 1DS mk3 and a 5Dmk2. The 1DS is FF but much slower, this one is very fast and does not miss a beat. I tested it at a dragster race and all the shots were in focus, the sequence remains in full focus. It is definitely dated and I have not compared it with newer machines but I find it very valid both as AF and as ISO. I used it in the evening, for freehand shots and the result is great. I'm really happy with the purchase. sent on September 04, 2019 |
 | Canon 1Ds Mark III Pros: Ergonomics, sensor quality, reliable AF and spectacular files Cons: Iso, weight and function management are a little bit special Opinion: I took this 1DS mk3 for the sake of a use with some years behind. I currently have a 5D mk2 and this 1DS. Series 1 has solved the 5D AF problem. This is spectacular. Virtually all the photos have the maf point where I want it and it's fast. Certainly it needs optics at the height of the body but the files that come out are spectacular. I use it mainly in the studio where it is giving me great satisfaction. I just have to be used to different function management. In the absence of the wheel, I always have to rumble on the various buttons to look for the required function ... but it's just a matter of practice..rn sent on June 15, 2017 |
 | Canon EF 35-350mm f/3.5-5.6L USM Pros: 10X very versatile, very low cost of purchase and. all things considered lightweight. Cons: not stabilized Opinion: I this lens from a couple of years. Not much (I always use mounted 24-105) but it is the ideal lens to bring on vacation. I used to take pictures for sports cars and the MAF is fast. I had no problems MAF short distance because I hardly subjects so close, but in the medium distance / long I find it wonderful. Excellent price / performance. Certain that the lack of stabilizer restricting its use in difficult light conditions, but it is located at 600-900 EUR ... practically less than half of a 28-300 (which comes to 300 and not 350!) sent on February 06, 2016 |
 | Canon 5D Mark II Pros: Machine body thickness, good files, now, in 2014, the acquisition cost Cons: Autofocus but for me it is not such a serious problem Opinion: I have this car for a couple of months, I use it mainly in the studio where the autofocus a bit 'slow is not a problem so important. The burst speed I have no problem because I hardly sports photos and nudist. I noticed that the AF occasionally, in low light, hard to keep up with the subject. For the rest of the files that are churning out great. Check in from a 5DC and a 50D and this is really at the top. Great purchase, especially now that it is at a really low price. rnOttimo live view, the handle professional (I also have the battery grip) and, in the transition from 5DC this note with pleasure the display more dettagliato.rnLa advice to tutti.rn sent on June 17, 2014 |
 | Canon 5D Pros: Cheap, good files (raw and jpeg), simple menu and improved ergonomics Cons: lacks live view, display a little 'low by today's standards Opinion: I have this body for a few weeks, bought used in December 2012 because I had the dream of a FF. I have a 50D and a 40D with APS and I must say that the files that come out of the 5D are exceptional. Excellent color rendering, incredible detail and quality far superior to even newer camera bodies. I'm really pleased. With a few hundred euro is a body that is able to give a lot of satisfaction. Suitable for those who are not looking for the 12 megapixel and is content ... I went down from 15 to 12 and I would never go back. rnCorpo sturdy, comfortable grip (like my 50), for what I have to do enough for me both iso (work always between 100 and 400) that the megapixels .. RNLA consigio groped for those who want a FF without spending a fortune (provided you already have some perspective!) rn sent on December 28, 2012 |
 | Tokina AT-X Pro 11-16mm f/2.8 DX II Pros: Build quality, aperture 2.8 Cons: Weight, it may be a defect, limited range, only 11-16 against 10-22/10-20 competition. Opinion: I took this wide-angle for the possibility of having the 2.8 aperture. I consider it a good goal. Good lenses, communicates well with my Canon 50D and sharpness is good. It can be a bit 'complicated to pass the switch from autofocus to manual is a plunger. I find it convenient, you have to look forward to the switch but it is different. The weight is not indifferent. It weighs about twice as much as other competitors aps. Petal-type hood included in the package. I find it valid and definitely feel like recommending it to anyone who wants a wide but not too pushed with a good build quality. sent on April 28, 2012 |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
