|
| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
Bobo76r www.juzaphoto.com/p/Bobo76r  |
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator. | Canon EF 35mm f/2 IS USM Pros: Sharpness! Featherweight. Wonderful colors style L. Bokeh series. Incredible 4-Stop stabilizer. Versatility. Lightning focus and 24cm from the subject. Quality price performance, absolutely unbeatable! Cons: None, even if F2 the effective stabilizer compensates abundantly. Opinion: I bought this lens after seeing reviews on YouTube and technical tests on the authoritative the digital picture and Dxomark. I was looking for sharpness and Canon colors, I'd say I found them. Sure 35mm are a focal sometimes handyman and sometimes not very versatile, depends on the moments. I love it, even if I regret a handyman type the Canon 24-105 f4 L that I had in the past, now I use it and anyway I put it in the market at a price that I will not only deal because right now I need more versatility. Unfortunately it's just a matter of money, not everyone can afford 1,000 optical and then you have to diversify a little, the fact remains that if I sell it sooner or later, in a more prosperous future, I buy it with my eyes closed because I am enthusiastic. It has a beautiful and fluffy blur, even at F4 is very nice because you can approach up to 24 cm from the subject create a nice effect as well as making the interested close-up, almost macros. Take pictures in the evening and the most gratifying thing, although I have a Canon 6d that holds the ISO as few, this lens seems to be made for cameras of this type, it accentuates the performance with an inimitable character and leave home the Flash is something Great. I have had in the past several zooms such as the Canon 24-105 F4 L is USM legendary lens, 24-70 F4 L is USM, beautiful and perfect but it misses that flicker, then the Tamron 24-70 F 2.8 VC USD (unfortunately a failed version) sharpest only at 24mm, then the 100mm F2 USM Cool but a little Along, and even the 70-200 F4 L smooth-punched as few, all resold to make different experiences, all except for the 50mm f 1.8 stm that I have from the beginning and always will keep. Well, the 35mm is by far the best I have tried, sharpness best of all, if the play almost equal to the 100mm, I think it is better, certainly are no doubt the colors, it looks like an L series. What about, if you have the doubt to buy this or the much acclaimed Sigma 1.4 Art, I would say to ask you my same questions during the purchase, then: How much do both weigh? How many times do I take pictures at 1.4? How many times do I do a thousand tests to see if the Sigma has problems with front and back focus because I will never be convinced at 100%? How much does the Sigma cost? Well, the answer to every question is, ok I buy the Canon and I go safe, but I'm around more than sure! is guaranteed. As a guy said on TV years ago... try to believe! Good light. Roberto sent on June 08, 2018 |
 | Tamron 28-75mm F/2.8 XR Di LD Pros: Astonishing sharpness of my specimen, with perfect focus, 2.8 at very low cost, 75mm make the difference compared to a 70 and those extra 5mm with excellent aperture and the ability to get close to the subject, because it is also a macro, creates a really remarkable bokeh , Beyond my expectation! The weight is really ridiculous and it is portable in every situation. Cons: Excellent at 28 and 35mm decade to 50 and 60mm and then return incredibly momentum to 75 in an absurd way with a sharpness and bokeh wonderful despite the only 7 lamella. Opinion: I have had several zoom lenses in recent years, the last of which the Canon 24-70 f4 L IS USM, this lens has given me a lot of satisfaction, a lens I defined in the review made, border the perfection, a lens really spectacular and sharp. In the end I sold it because I began to appreciate the fixed lenses for lightness and sharpness so I purchased the Tamron 28-75 just to have a handyman lens bright, inexpensive and for the eventualities, light and casual outings in the family. And who you had to wait all is quality?? I had no expectations, I was stunned! Paid used 250 euros, practically in new conditions with beautiful black and non-white ring nuts, New! I purchased it from a user of subito.it a professional photographer who I appreciated as a first person of all, who also made me try his Tamron 24-70 F 2.8 vc USD in his photo studio and is a beast of lens even better than the Canon F4 probably but Heavy as few.. This guy bought to work the lenses in physical stores and told me that at every purchase he will test at least 5 of the same model because Tamron has a bad quality control and most has flaws in front and back focus and since it leaves him down a kidney every VO LTA, he claims to try them thoroughly, and how right he is! In fact, even this 28-75 is perfect and I was definitely lucky to come across this guy that I will never finish to thank, even for the precious suggestions. The advice that I want to give everyone is to give him a chance and if immediately there is no surprise then give up because he has something wrong with the specimen that you have in your hands, because the good ones are beautiful and do not regret a Canon or Nikon , be sure. Even in low light hooks well, the engine is not ultrasound but hooks so fast that you do not feel even, small movements that do not absolutely regret the USM. It also has a 28mm lock button to prevent the barrel from lengthening. It is true that the edges loses in sharpness, it is absolutely true but honestly preferring the portraits do not count as flaw. At 75mm with a really close focus, I think about 30cm maximum, since it is also a macro from technical card, creates a spectacular bokeh effect worthy of a portrait lens, try to believe! As I wrote in the cons, between 50 and 60 loses a little bit but nothing, strange that in the middle you behave so but my eseplare is just like that. What else to say... Trust me buy it! Good luck to everyone. sent on May 05, 2018 |
 | Canon EF 24-70mm f/4 L IS USM Pros: Noticeable sharpness at all focals already at F4 really exciting, beautiful saturated colors, impeccable construction and interesting macros. Cons: It is the perfect lens for the advanced and demanding amateur photographer, a professional would like more an F 2.8 in fact it turns on the Big Brother Mk 2 as it is right that it is. Opinion: I have wanted this lens since I took the 6d however I got dragged first by the 24-105 F4 L is USM that I found excellent with beautiful colors and remarkable versatility and then after having sold it I got it back from the Tamron 24-70 f2.8 VC USD pensado to reach The perfection between performance and light but soon I realized that in terms of Scalsa little brightness could, it would be served a flash, then the colors have never convinced me much, never made me come the effect "wow" even if I hit the sharpness immediately A really stratospheric 24mm but end of story. I bought later this exceptional Canon and I found my size, I was satisfied in everything and for everything, even the macro that I never considered was a continuous discovery, has beautiful colors, a construction that borders the Perfection, everything in this lens borders on perfection, perfect focal and the handyman par excellence and the macro despite not having a ratio of 1:1 but 0.7 is really what makes this fantastic lens unique in its genre and handyman as never before. The 24-105 to 100mm was a little limp, portraits too soft and blurry, lacked the right grit, stop at 70 to then take a Canon 100mm F2 USM is the next step that I will do very briefly (done the. Day 28/03/18 and resold reluctantly the Canon 24-70 because I did not use it practically never, general problems with children in tow. I enjoyed this lens and now that I do not regret it again and maybe one day I will regain it. On the 6d there was that is a beauty. According to many the lens hood is uncomfortable because of the button fastening, I personally find it clever and very very comfortable, then it is not exaggerated but sober and elegant, it is great. I highly recommend to all this lens that I know to be used also by professionals, it is rewarding and if then you associate with beautiful prime lenses I would say that a photo amateur is not needed anything else. I hope I was helpful to all the undecided. sent on December 06, 2017 |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
