|
| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
Marcellociervo www.juzaphoto.com/p/Marcellociervo  |
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator. | Tamron SP 70-300mm f/4-5.6 Di VC USD Pros: Value for money, Stabilizer and Price Cons: Weight, sharpness that drops over 200mm Opinion: This lens has accompanied me for 5 years on my former 650D and as far as it costs I can say that it is a really good lens in value for money, obviously if you start comparing to canon L series optics or superior optics of other brands, then the difference is there and you see. Personally I used it in day and night landscaping and also for my son's football matches and he never missed a beat, despite the slowness of the 650D, the rows always workable and sharp up to 200/220mm, as well as then you lose quality. Note TOP is the stabilizer that is phenomenal really, guarantees what is written, 3/4 stop definitely, otherwise good yield as mentioned, also the typical colors of the tamron lenses and also the speed, stabilizer apart from that when it is active takes a few seconds to start. I sold it only and exclusively for the 70-200 f/4 canon. sent on April 07, 2021 |
 | Sigma 35mm f/1.4 DG HSM Art Pros: Ta sharpness, construction, yield and colors Cons: Weight but you know it at the time of purchase. Opinion: I've been chasing this lens for many years, its myth is now on everyone's mouth, and I decided to buy it when I switched to FF to complete with the kit I have. Immediately you can feel the weight, the footprint and the solid construction all in metal and after a few shots a sublime empathy really arises. This is a focal point that must please especially on FF, because for many it is a middle ground, but personally I prefer it to 50mm. After taking it as a prescient, I dabbled with a few test shots here and there, but after a shoot with a future mom I appreciated the optical qualities and the stories that are heard around, I can say that at f/1.4 the focus part is already of an absurd sharpness, closing even more is top really, Personally I snapped at f/8 and the model's skin was all too sharp, so I really recommend not going beyond f/5.6 also to give a naturalness and not having to work too much in post production. Moreover, it has natural colors, creamy and uniform blurry and does not suffer from chromatic aberrations, the focus is quite rapid, at least on my EOS R, where precisely you do not need the dock, which I recommend instead for the DSRL system. For me I vote 9.5. sent on April 07, 2021 |
 | Canon EF 70-200mm f/4.0 L USM Pros: Used price, weight, fixed opening and L series construction Cons: Not tropicalized, not stabilized, lack of tripod bracket, but all things that are already known at the time of purchase Opinion: Bought used at a price (200€) and has very good performances even more than 20 years after its release, and as far as I am concerned it was money well spent on a fixed focal zoom-tele. At such a figure you cannot buy even a standard lens and you certainly cannot expect to have stabilization, tropicalization and fixed f/2.8. The mount with adapter on the Canon Eos R and the optical and constructive quality is from the L Canon series you can immediately see right, before I had a Tamron 70-300 VC, but this immediately gave me incredible landscape details, sharp and with truly vivid colors, I just have to try it on portraiture even better. To date I tell the truth, the only thing maybe I feel less about the tamron, is just stabilization, here I must always be above safety times so as not to have micromox, you also want the density of the Eos R, but CMQ remains a respectable perspective. In conclusion, if you have a limited budget and do not want an f/2.8, this lens is a must have to own, love as mentioned given the price on the used, obviously if money is not a problem or for professional reasons ... 2.8 all life. sent on March 08, 2021 |
 | Canon EOS R Pros: Ergonomics, mpx, dynamic range, AF, image quality, dynamic range. Cons: single slot, burst, lack focus bracketing, lack of GPS and Canon APP. Opinion: First mirrorless after years of reflex and specifically a modest 650D and I have to say that the impact was really great. It has a typical ergonomics of Canon chambers that fit perfectly in the hands as well as weight and size. The thing that impressed me the most was the AF, I was used to that of the 650D and here instead it is a different story of its own, always ready and responsive, the only out of tune note is the very low burst, you know that it is not for sport, but I believe that getting to at least 8 fps would be the minimum on such a car. The touch bar what to say, you have to get used to it because it is very practical, but also very sensitive and just nothing to be active, I set it to the type of AF and it works perfectly. The file that pulls out this camera is gorgeous, full of information and with recoverable files at both low iso and high iso, testing it I was able to ascertain that up to 1600/3200 iso the photos have a noise up recoverable in post, obviously it always depends on the shooting conditions, I also ascertained that the noise produced at iso 100 in underexposed shots (invariance) is also minimal, I recovered a photo with 4 stops underexposed in a top way. Another positive note is the customization, you can customize it in all and everything so that you have everything at hand and it is not true that without the famous wheel everything is difficult, even here it is a question of adapting, even if in the last R5 and R6 they have put it back as requested by the pros. The only ones in or without the camera are the lack of the double slot that in my opinion could be replaced with a good APP so that you can back up via WIFI to the smartphone in real time, even at the expense of the battery, as well as the lack of bracketing on the fire and native GPS inside the camera itself. To date I believe it is a best buy in value for money, to be definitely had. sent on December 11, 2020 |
 | Canon EF 85mm f/1.2 L II USM Pros: Three-dimensionality, Planes Detachment, Colors, Sharpness, Blurry Cons: Weight and foot-and-mouth Opinion: Magic lens with all its flaws if they can be considered such. I mounted this lens first on a modest 650D, but recently I use it on a worthy machine such as the Canon Eos R and I must say that it literally changes, acquires its full potential on the R, three-dimensional, sharpness already at TA, I must say that the AF is also faster than the old machine, although it is not miraculous in certain situations especially in the backlight. For portraits it is a must in my opinion to have, obviously very static portraits where as mentioned the AF does not go crazy and also because its weight feels it at the end of the shooting session, but my initial impressions and now with the R are really "first of the class" without a doubt any. Top! Rating 9.5 sent on November 02, 2020 |
 | Sigma 105mm f/2.8 Macro DG OS HSM Pros: double stabilizer, sharpness, precise, blurred Cons: nobody for now, indeed perhaps only the weight, but there is a quality objective Opinion: I bought this lens after various readings and re-readings, I use it on a 650D canon and I find it really fantastic for its precision and speed both to f / 2.8 and use for portraits and both for its main feature MACRO, has a sharpness of fear that is making me really entertain, moreover the double stabilizer both vertical and horizontal allows you to shoot freehand without problems and in absolute safety because you can not always bring or have the time of the tripod. I do not know the yield on bodies FF but on aps-c I recommend it to 101%. sent on March 10, 2018 |
 | Canon EF 50mm f/1.8 STM Pros: Lightweight construction, improved sharpness, f / 1.8, quieter AF motor, economical. Cons: Do not use it. Opinion: I bought back this view after selling the old 50mm 1.8 II model, which means the previous version did not have surprised me, at least on APS-C (650D), was slow and noisy, this new 50mm 1.8 STM version was immediately struck by its quietness and speed of focus, also at least by the first shots I made gained greater sharpness and blur even at TA. It 'also improved construction that the bayonet metal which makes it very compact and well built with icing on the cake that goes from 5 to 7 diaphragm blades which makes a big difference that produces beautiful brokeh that will make you fall in love. What is a perspective that has been improved from all points of view, and that in some ways is even better than the big brother 1.4 (unlike unjustified price). A TA is soft obviously, but then the opening in which we all cimentiamo, but from f / 3 is phenomenal, I advise everyone to always have it at hand. sent on March 15, 2017 |
 | Sigma 17-50mm f/2.8 EX DC OS HSM Pros: excellent build quality, sharpness as well, fast and quiet AF, F / 2.8, stabilizer, lens hood Cons: Weight and the focusing ring does not Full time AF Opinion: I bought new in July 2015 I had time to stressarlo as they should, and I must say that I have not disconnected from my Canon 650D, a handyman lens from 17 to 50, with a discreet sharpness already af / 2.8, f / 4 onwards it is superb. At first I was doubtful when choosing between the sigma 17-50, Tamron 17-50 and Canon 17-55, but then I think I made the right choice, from field testing is much more sharp and smooth performance of the Tamron and almost at par emblazoned Canon, and i do not think the price difference has reason to exist between the two except for the brand. I had no front / back focus problems, even on my previous 17-70 model I had none, Sigma in recent years has improved a lot on this. super stabilizer least +3 stop, only draw weight that is felt after a day of work and the focus is not adjustable Full-time AF automatically, the rest would really recommend it to anyone who wants to make a quantum leap , I can always take good shots at home. 9.5 rating. sent on February 25, 2016 |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
