|
| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
Shel www.juzaphoto.com/p/Shel  |
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator. | Huawei Mate 20 Pro Pros: CAMERA, DEFINITION, PROCESSOR. Cons: Camera menu a bit laborious. Weight a little higher than average, but the battery requires it. But above all the fact that with each re-ignition, the brightness is adjusted on AUTOMATIC. Opinion: it is a great camera that can also phone and connect to the web. You have to familiarize yourself with all the menus and slowly delve into the various sophisticated regulations. The philosophy needs to be changed: it is no longer to be considered "mobile", but a high-performance optical device. After a month of confidence, you tune in and you don't go back. sent on October 21, 2019 |
 | Canon EF-M 22mm f/2 STM Pros: Sharp, precise, great definition, very pleasant colors Cons: I would say nobody Opinion: Its size, in the first measure, seems to be the strong point of this perspective ... but then emerge qualities that make you fall in love.rnFor "street" photo is ideal, but also traveling is a feather, and for the landscapes it seems done apposta.rnInsomma: 22mm consider him a "handyman" quiet of never being denied .... sent on December 29, 2017 |
 | Canon EOS M3 Pros: Upgrade from real mirrorless, very easy usability, lightweight, good sensor, color rendering and outstanding contrast. Cons: The speed is remarkable but still miss that split ..... Opinion: I had the M1 and I sold it after less than a month with considerable loss economica.rnQui we are on another planet. rnSforna files of a disarming beauty, does not bring nostalgia reflex.rnNelle sports photos you can not rely on a lightning quickness, but all in all not delude.rnPer everything else would call IMPECCABLE. sent on December 16, 2016 |
 | Canon EF 28-300mm f/3.5-5.6 L IS USM Pros: Versatile and lofty definition. amazingly accurate colors. Robust construction and reliability at every opportunity. Cons: Cost, weight. Opinion: After several years of great satisfaction with 35-350 L, I had some difficult time photographing to 350mm in the absence of stabilization. After extensive research has presented me an opportunity to jump to 28-300.rnOttima yield: an already TA blade, even more so when you close the one / two stop.rnFrancamente already with 35-350 yield was high, but with the peace of mind stabilizer is 360 gradi.rnUnico neo perhaps is represented by, weight is not just "feather" that recommends a varied management during a giornatarndi photography. Used for a few hours, the situation becomes much more fluid and divertente.rnRitengo well that despite the cost, in time may prove a good investment, because the spread of devaluation rndiversi years becomes minimal, partly because there are not many circulation and even less on the market dell'usato.rn sent on August 11, 2016 |
 | Canon EF 50mm f/1.8 II Pros: positive judgment on the optical component. Cons: Mechanics, electronics, auto focus and materials from pre-war absolutely. Opinion: I felt a feeling like this for about twenty years, with the very first Tamron and Sigma to focus that we had to think about a quarter of ora.Plasticaccia that deteriorates the sguardo.rnI glass instead are of good quality, and the price is interesting, but you can expect great satisfaction ........ rnMi would limit to a neutral judgment ... sent on January 17, 2016 |
 | Canon EF 70-200mm f/4.0 L USM Pros: Lightweight, weather sealing, simple construction, definition, speed AF. - Rn In practice, a "mule" that you do not ever plan. Cons: no one Opinion: Great lens to be used almost exclusively in outdoor lighting conditions alta.rnLa average quality of the results justifies the longevity of this article without the need for intervention or Mark II.rnPersonalmente I also have the F 2.8 IS, which offers better outputs can be coded for brightness or other situazionirnimprevedibili.rnQuesta is the lens that should not be missing in any outfit worthy of respect, as well as all leading to a very considerable cost. sent on November 10, 2014 |
 | Canon EF 400mm f/4.0 DO IS USM Pros: ideal scope for sports or nature photos. Weight under two Kg with excellent quality lenses. Trpicalizzazione and robustness very evident. Extender usable maintaining speed hooking fast autofocus. Love at first sight Cons: The price, of course, is a bit 'high. Opinion: With 400mm especially in combination with APS-C is created optimal length: with all the lightness does not create big problems in the transfers. These are optical high-performance, high-class and easy set neither weight nor dimensions. I believe that the usability of this optic makes it immediately apprezzabilissimo. sent on February 15, 2014 |
 | Canon EF 35-350mm f/3.5-5.6L USM Pros: Versatility ', definition, weight Cons: Zoom mechanism can be activated with the "pump" you love it or hate it .... rnData the lack of stabilization, not always' practicable "freehand" Opinion: Onestissimo zoom even after 11 years after production. Fast focus, definition worthy of the series to which L appartiene.rnL 'opening 5.6 in many cases represents a limit, but does perte of compromise due ... rnConsigliatissimo a purchasing used, assuming a situation of functionality 'verifiable, since the reperibilita' of spare parts should not be taken for granted. sent on September 01, 2013 |
 | Canon 1Ds Pros: FF sensor timely and characterized by contrast and colors of all respect. rnComandi intuitive and easy to handle (after appropriate short training) Cons: Display modest weight a little 'outdated, limited ISO range available. Opinion: I recently purchased an Eos 1Ds to be attached to a 40d and a 7d right to have a FF corredo.rnDall 'purchase I've used in practice only this, a bit' to get familiar with the controls, a bit 'to make me contorndi strengths and limiti.rnIl most evident limit (as we have become accustomed otherwise) is the size of the display, and not the immediate revision of the sequence of files, but you get used to after a hundred scatti.rnIl body is magnificent and proves the first contact for consistency and pleasantness of materiali.rnCerto that with current prices, I think it's a shame not to have it in the kit .... rnFoto sports eligible only for sport "slow" (meaning they do not need to gusts 8fps) and preferably outdoors with natural light: the ISO relatively little going to affect shooting indoor sports or cumunque light scarsa.rnFoto landscape and portrait instead give results "to the great" plasticity, sharpness and contrast eccezionali.rnDovendo choose a camera within a certain range of prezzo, I prefer a professianle a bit 'dated like this, but with a more current end amatoriale.rnIn conjunction with L-series lenses and the results are as unthinkable for a camera of at least 10 years. sent on March 04, 2013 |
 | Canon EF 100-400mm f/4.5-5.6 L IS USM Pros: Sharpness, relatively light-proven construction, distance MAF reduced, fast AF, good stabilization. Cons: A little 'dated, but without competitors instead. Opinion: I've owned a few years ago for about six months. Excellent results, limiting the extremes .... that 'maximum focal or opening massima.rnIl best result I've always been open with F8, then .... then .... I decided to sell it because I own already 'a 300 f 2.8 and a 35-350 L.rnErrore! I had to keep me 'cause for various reasons are not really "duplication" ... if you think about weight, practicality 'and versatility'. rnOra'm looking calmly resuming a fairly "fresh" and price conveniente.rnDomanda: It seems that every month just to miss the presentation of the new version but ..... However, the competition does not offer anything similar, so ..... sent on October 23, 2012 |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
