|
| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
Fiorella Spagnoli www.juzaphoto.com/p/FiorellaSpagnoli  |
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator. | Nikon D850 Pros: Fantastic grip. Remarkable files and incredible details. Despite the many megapixels gives realistic and reliable photos. Cons: Weight. For me as a woman. Opinion: I got it a few times from my partner. Coupled with the fantastic 16 35 VR. A bomb. Fast, versatile and precise. They have improved and added many options also in the menu and when shooting in live view. For me, who loves landscaping, it's great to have the viewfinder that closes with a click. What can I say despite its many megapixels gives precise and balanced files with excellent and reliable colors. On the monitor it is quite easy both to make a simple post, and to be able to try something more complex. Provided, of course, that you have made a good exposure. It is a car that at least for me makes its weight felt but also gives a great idea of solidity. I like it, I shoot with pleasure and recommend it to all those who love files with great naturalness and quality in color. The difference with other products of a few years ago is noticeable. sent on December 06, 2022 |
 | Tamron SP 10-24mm F/3.5-4.5 Di II LD Pros: Angle of view. Durable construction. Cons: Unclear colors not always homogeneous Opinion: Used socket at an attractive price. The angle of view is remarkable. Pecca quite sharpness but overall gives granitic shots. It is a robust companion that gives important emotions. Post production must be managed in the best possible way due to colors that are not always homogeneous and a few too many flares. Excellent construction, including the hood. For me it is a lens that if found used at a great price gives very interesting satisfactions. sent on February 11, 2022 |
 | Samyang AF 14mm f/2.8 FE Pros: Sharp. Color rendering. Af. Cons: Improved construction Opinion: A lens of both construction quality and optical certainly superior compared to the first Samyang. However it is not worth 650 euros official fowa. Autofocus makes the difference and you can see, even if the price is sincerely a bit high. Excellent hot chromaticity and the ability to adjust the focus after the af. Good sharpness already at full aperture, closing you get excellent results. Quite sharp at the edges, pay a little price of the absence of the lens profile in lightroom, but it is the only thing to do. For the rest is a nice trinket that I recommend to those who want a wide angle for sony of good work without going in the disproportionate band of the hegemony Zeiss. However unique lens of its kind. To be used with filters and 150mm holder sent on January 13, 2018 |
 | Sony FE 16-35mm f/4 ZA OSS Vario Tessar T* Pros: Excellent construction and optical quality. Cons: Perhaps the direction of the zoom ring Opinion: Taken for a few months. Tested for good. Phenomenal lens, unique colors. The weight is right but the construction is exceptional. Zeiss quality all the way. Price more than fair for a lens with unique colors and excellent clarity. The only flaw perhaps a minimum of distortion and a little vignetting. All correctable in post. Excellent anyway. Highly recommended sent on January 08, 2018 |
 | Canon 1300D Pros: Colors, good image quality, grain and raw quality Cons: Perhaps kept to high iso insufficient. Nothing else in relation to the price. Opinion: Taking it in addition to my admirers, I have to say that it does not flawless even with respect to the full frame "snooping". Good picture quality, sophisticating the dynamic range and, if you think about how much it costs, the difference even with the quadruple machines of the cost, you realize that it is not just a machine to start but also and above all to be a active companion Your pro kit. So I'd say it's ideal to start, but it's great to continue! sent on June 20, 2017 |
 | Tamron 15-30mm f/2.8 VC USD Pros: Few, I was expecting much more to see the price. Made immediately for something that has character Cons: It has no character. Files that are empty, empty, without a chromatic character. Opinion: I took this lens convinced of making the right choice, especially after hearing and reading exciting opinions, so I did it after twenty-four hours in favor of something that was of a character. On canon 6D is fine, it's crisp, maybe too. The files are empty, empty, without personality, without a real chromatic character, even closing the diaphragm has the feeling of always having that feeling of dissatisfaction. As if he could do more, but he did not. For me it has no character, not worth it as it costs. The building is all "fuffa", all plastic. Okay is big, huge ... and then? For me it is not worth what it costs to repeat. Better opt for lenses maybe f4 but they have an indisputable character at the chromatic level like the Canon Canon 16-35 f4 is.rnrn sent on May 05, 2017 |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
