|
| sent on 28 Giugno 2023
Pros: Price, lightness, cost of compatible accessories, simplicity of the menus, arrangement of the keys, megapixels (in my opinion) more than enough, body that has withstood more than 4 falls from 1 meter in height and has never hinted at a drop in performance.
Cons: Cheap materials (for what it costs is still fine), ISO that after 400 begin to give existential crises, AF with 9 points that from f / 8 onwards becomes almost unusable, to the point that it is wrong 4 times out of 5.
Opinion: My first SLR, I've been using it for 7 years, and I don't know where to start. Purchased as soon as it came out, I didn't even know what a "manual shooting" was, it gave me the easiest way to learn how to photograph, simple and intuitive menus, few parameters to configure, few focus points, little everything. But this is both a pro and a con. It is a con for those who use € 2000 of camera body and are punctilious and sensationalist experts who appreciate nothing and spit on a camera body that is not made for them. It is a pro because in a single body it is able to teach you everything you need to start, if you attack an L-series lens it becomes a scalpel, then if you give it to him from f / 4 down he is not afraid of anyone. He gave me breathtaking shots, his megapixels are more than enough, do not listen to the exaggerated photographers who narrate their adventures while as a camera body they use the James Webb, who shoot the 50 megapixels on APS-C as the absolute truth ... they simply never compared its quality to the price, or they never brought the camera body to cover itself with mud in the middle of a via ferrata on the Gran Sasso or in natural parks in the rain or concerts in the middle of pouring rain. From the mother house the body is not tropicalized, but I went there in pouring rain to do services at the concerts a lot of times, it never gave hint of drops in performance. She has never missed a file, even if she only has an SD card slot she has always been reliable. Its weight is certainly one of the most important factors, it does not tire... If you attack the 50 "plastic fantastic" weighs nothing and makes a mess. The very small viewfinder I do not consider it neither a pro nor a con, it is a con because at times it does not even make you understand if the subject is in focus or not in situations of poor visibility (fog) or low light. It is a pro (in my opinion) in teaching moving subjects in the straight, you do not lose the reference of the frame, of course then if you shoot with one eye closed and one open you lose it anyway, but they are details. My biggest cons I give it to non-reactive AF points and ISO usable only before 400, for the rest is the camera body of the beginner, the neophyte, the inserted, but it is still a perfect camera body, but ONLY FOR THEM |
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.
![[editors pick]](shared_files/layout/ep_badge.jpg){kind=icon}
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.
