|
| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
Evil_Jin www.juzaphoto.com/p/Evil_Jin  |
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator. | TTArtisan 100mm f/2.8 Bubble Bokeh Pros: A Trioplan 100 2.8 that costs a fifth of the price on the new Cons: All manual and without electrical contacts marks f0 in exif like all lenses without contacts. Lack of lens hood which is mandatory Opinion: For those looking for the Trioplan effect this is the perfect lens, I also had the latest Meyer version and they are identical in final rendering, metal construction, the only relevant difference is that to mount this you have to buy an M42 adapter. Another small difference is that this one comes without a lens hood but you just need to buy a 049 metal screw one on Amazon and it is mandatory in my opinion because of the ease with which the flare impacts the image using this lens. To get the desired effect you have to look for the right background and light, it is not obvious and it also applies to the Trioplan. For the rest nothing to say, what it gives at a fraction of the price compared to the original is worth the expense of the 199 euros it costs but you have to know what you are buying, vote 10 for those like me who know what they buy and maybe 7 or less for those who buy randomly. Hi PS.. The cap is screw-on and for some it may be a con, I say this for the sake of completeness sent on March 09, 2024 |
 | Meyer Gorlitz Trioplan 100mm f/2.8 II Pros: Blur effect, solid construction Cons: Price, manual and contactless optics, the existence of the TTArtisan 100 2.8 Opinion: If you are looking for this lens you will already know almost everything, the lens offers the effect you see in the example photos as long as you find suitable light and background. Nothing to say, at full opening a little so soft and prone to internal reflections that give that fairytale look to the image, closing and putting the lens hood improves everything. In hindsight and I hope to be useful to those who will read, I would buy directly the TTartisan 100 2.8 and the adapter for the M42 mount, which costs nothing and gives the exact same result, we are talking about an exaggerated price difference between two lenses with the same type of metal construction and optical scheme. Collectors aside, listen to me, don't waste money and go Chinese directly to Amazon. sent on March 09, 2024 |
 | Fujifilm XF 150-600mm f/5.6-8 R LM OIS WR Pros: Weight, internal zoom, af speed, finish, full aperture sharpness, tripod collar Cons: new price, not F4 Opinion: I would have liked to pronounce myself more in the trying it even more but I read so many minchiate in the last review that I felt compelled to express my opinion about the lens in question. As construction the finishes are premium, the plastics used and the painting are from top models, just see the video during assembly worthy of a top-of-the-range red badge lens. The tripod bracket is very comfortable, when needed it loosens and takes off to continue photographing freehand. It's F8, you know before buying it you don't find out any time after, if you want to shoot in the dark without raising the iso is the wrong lens, I thought it was an obvious thing to report but it seems not. Compared to the 100-400 of which I had 3 copies in the past the construction is on higher levels, also as precision of zoom ring and focus, not to mention that the first has the barrel completely in plastic not really premium, more similar to the 70-300. As sharpness on a 40 mega pixel body there is no comparison in favor of this biancone. There are focus keys on the front, very convenient when used to return to a preset focus point. I use it on XH2 and as an autofocus it is fast and responsive, much more than on the 100-400. Obviously if you want the top performance better use it with an H2s. For me it is the definitive solution for birds in good light but now with the new cameras and denoising programs I do not see great problems to use it in most of the outputs, as long as you know what you are doing. I had the 200-500 nikon that I used on both D500 and D800 and it was an excellent zoom but bulkier and no better in terms of sharpness and versatility and it wasn't even tropicalized, I would never go back. I repeat for me it is an excellent lens for what it is, a relatively light super zoom to use more by hand than on tripods, I did not notice chromatic aberrations or purple fringe. Anyway I recommend it, on the used now is also reasonably priced . Hello everyone sent on February 23, 2023 |
 | Lowepro Flipside Trek BP 450 AW Pros: Lightweight, rain cover, back side opening. Cons: not much space at the top, cost Opinion: Good backpack, finally light and that does not weigh too much on the total weight like others that look like suitcases and then empty weigh 3kg .. Good shoulder straps but not too padded, good belt with a pair of pockets for small objects, comfortable backrest that does not sweat too much in summer. The opening on the back side allows you to change lens, being very careful even in situations where you can not place the backpack on the ground, keeping the belt at the waist closed and freeing a shoulder strap. Another positive side is the presence of rain cover and emergency whistle on the laces of the chest closure. It is also quite comfortable not too big and quite adjustable on the back I am 1.82cm although it does not have the adjustments over the shoulders to distance it. It does not have much space in the "non-photographic" part, I put gloves, hat or rain folded but the space is over ... If you have to bring food and go on long hikes, opt for something else. It costs a bit but in my opinion it is a good backpack for medium-term excursions. sent on November 22, 2022 |
 | Venus Laowa 65mm f/2.8 2x Ultra Macro APO Pros: Small, light, crisp, zero chromatic aberrations, fluid focus ring, diaphragm ring Cons: does not have contacts, manual fire Opinion: I recently have this lens bought a little blindly looking at some online reviews, the monto on Fuji Xt4 and I fell in love with it, it is really exceptional, excellent at pushed magnifications and goes well even for portraits maintaining a blurry "precise" and almost free of chromatic aberrations. It is very light and discreet, the focus ring is very precise and clutched the right, good the ring of the diaphragms. It's all made of metal, including the light screen. Mounted on mirrorless, despite not having contacts and the F.0 iris is marked on the display, however you can easily expose thanks to the on-screen or evf preview. The only negative note is the not being able to use the automatisms of the xt4 for focus bracketing but otherwise for me it is really perfect and I absolutely feel like recommending it. sent on March 04, 2021 |
 | Fujifilm XF 56mm f/1.2 R Pros: Sharpness, rendering/look of images , bokeh Cons: it's not tropicalized Opinion: on XT-3 is just enough to make street and unlike other not known big noises for photo use, I would use it in manual for video . The rendering of the images is sharp already at 1.2 with an excellent microcontrast and the colors are pasty and recognizable compared to the same photo made with another newer lens, here goes to taste . It is very susceptible to flare and if you do not notice it kills the contrasts, but if handled well allows portraits in backlight in my opinion fantastic. One flaw for me is that it is not water resistant, so I would be very careful to shoot in the rain or in a desert, beach etc... It is relatively compact even if it weighs enough, especially for those with an Xt-3 or X-pro3. sent on December 05, 2019 |
 | DJI Mavic Mini Pros: Take it everywhere - You only need insurance and nothing else but comply with ENAC rules Cons: Doesn't have Follow Me or Active Track Opinion: I had the spark, the mavic air and the mavic 2 pro , I sold them because I do not want to invest in exams, transponders and all the duties related to this weight band . I took this mini closed box before seeing any review online, compared to the spark and the mavic air has a scary battery life, coming to 15% in "normal" flight I did even 28 minutes with a charge. I recommend the combo version to have three batteries, the charger, the spare heliches and the transport handbag that you take individually would cost much more. Do not prey on the FCC version that is bought in Chinese stores, it is not so advantageous, if you force GPS abroad is illegal and if they stop you or if you make an accident there could be serious problems. The quality of the videos in 2.7k is excellent, comparable to the 4k of the Mavic Air on OLED 4k TV to have to see the differences you have to stay with your nose attached to the TV. It doesn't have manual controls for video camera settings but it does have the AE block which helps a lot. The JPegs are great, the same as those of Mavic Air but you can not change the white balance although automatically I have to say that for now he has never made a mistake. Compared to the others, automatic panoramas, automatic HDRs, etc. are also missing. all stuff easily doable in post , indeed the Automatic Air Panoramas were often not the best , better a suitable external software in my opinion. It does not have sensors except the VPU for landing and positioning without GPS , it is very stable , it is very easy and fluid to the response of the controls , much less nervous than air and spark and the radio signal in CE is great , I have never had forced disconnections in flight conditions non-extreme. It costs relatively little for what it offers and I would recommend it to anyone who wants a drone but who are frightened by the new ENAC regulations. The only real flaw that is missing in my opinion is that there is no Active Track mode, the one in which the drone automatically follows us and films, they say will never be implemented, yet there is in drones much cheaper and older as the Dobby Zerotech Wonder! Remember that insurance is mandatory However for me it's the perfect drone to take wherever I vote 10 sent on December 05, 2019 |
 | Nikon AF-S 24-120mm f/4 G ED VR Pros: And 'The all-rounder Cons: Blur and sharpen the ends not by optical Fixed Opinion: Bought for the second time after passing through various 24-70 2.8, Nikon, Tamron, Sigma 24-105 or rnQuando etc ... I want to go around with the D800 and a single goal the 24-120 is my favorite , it will not be a blade sharpness nor with a blurred record but still my favorite color returns compared to other brands of similar lenses. RNE 'true that cartoon wide open especially to 24mm and decreases yield to the maximum extent ... but anyway it is a zoom lens that is located a few goes a little better in sharpness (such as Sigma) but for me it has more yield in tonal steps, colors and complexion ... that often tends to be underestimated in the choices thinking it occasionally with a little post production you can correct anything .rnIn conclusion, today it is fairly priced and for me it is worth every penny then recommend how everything do to FF but I would not advise him of format DX / APS-C, especially wide angle side would lose in versatility! sent on March 24, 2016 |
 | Nikon AF-S 105mm f/2.8 G ED VR Micro Pros: blurred, rendering color, sharpness, construction, vr, works with nikon tc Cons: lack collar for tripod Opinion: I had so many macro lenses and I have to say that with this I found the peace of mind, as well as macros thanks to a good VR also use it by hand for portraits and I like the blurred and colors that returns. I use it often with a TC17 and the results are not bad at all. The focus is precise, silent and fast enough on D800, even if not meteoric. The only drawback for me is the lack of a collar with a foot mount it on three feet, to use it with extension tubes must strive much given its weight. However recommended sent on February 19, 2016 |
 | Nikon AF-S 300mm f/4 D ED Pros: weight, price, construction, optics Cons: Neck and leg tripod unsuitability stabilized. Opinion: I got the latest version of the 300 AF-S for five years and I sold it only to the new stabilized .rnUn 'optical beautiful that I used as a macro with the PN-11. rnCon the TC14 and TC17 going great although the decline of performance of 'auto-focus, especially with TC17 is considerably less sharpness that remains ottima.rnIl biggest flaw is the tripod collar, initially with the use of easel, lifted mirror preventive and cable release I obtained an unclear image with time not too slow, then bought the collar Kirk everything changed and I had always stunningly sharp shots if not for my sake .rnOggi is just in 'used and I I would recommend it to anyone who wants a professional tele without having to sell a kidney for comprarlo.rnrn sent on May 11, 2015 |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
