|
| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
GabrieleBielli www.juzaphoto.com/p/GabrieleBielli  |
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator. | Nikon D750 Pros: image quality, autofocus, construction, battery life. Cons: Shutter and flash sync castrated for commercial choice. Opinion: excellent machine, with excellent image quality. Autofocus is fast and responsive, but the AF points in some cases are a little too concentrated at the center of the viewfinder. Great tilting the screen and the feeling of robustness and quality. Too bad for the commercial decision to castrate the shutter to 1 / 4000s and flash sync at 1 / 200s, even the barrage would have benefited from a few shots per second at most. rnUna mention to the absorption of energy management: if you do not often use the live view is quite possible to get through a day's work on one battery. sent on July 06, 2016 |
 | Tamron SP 70-200mm f/2.8 Di LD Pros: Construction, optical quality, general feel to the touch Cons: Lack of at least a minimum tropicalization, precise AF, but not very fast Opinion: This is a Mr. canvases, with excellent optical quality. Always crisp, also it offers a low distortion and chromatic aberrations can be managed. But lacking the stabilizer is not a fault because if ever a choice, at a price that is proposed can not really ask for more. The AF is precise but not fast, it still lives together just fine. solid construction but lacks the tropicalization. For what it's worth ... I find it aesthetically beautiful. Large lens, must-have. sent on May 26, 2016 |
 | Tamron SP 17-50mm f/2.8 XR Di II LD Pros: Sharpness, lightness, constant aperture. Cons: Economic sense of touch, noisy and a bit imprecise AF. Opinion: Using this lens for 5 years and I'm really happy, optically is really very, very good. It 'clear at all apertures and all focal lengths, is not affected too diffraction (better not to go beyond f / 20, anyway) and chromatic aberrations, even if present, are almost always correctable in post. The AF is reasonably fast but noisy and a bit imprecise, also the ring then turn you must be careful where you put your fingers. The distortion is normal. The construction is concrete but do not let positive emotions, but I can assure you it is built to last: my has no defect even after five years of hard use. Recommended! sent on May 25, 2016 |
 | Tamron AF 17-35mm f/2.8-4 Di Ld IF Pros: Sharp in the center at all apertures and focal, lightweight and compact. Monta filters screw 77mm diameter. Cons: Crisp on the whole frame to f / 5.6 onwards, improved autofocus. economic construction to the touch. Opinion: Great wide-angle zoom, with a quality / unbeatable price (it is now only used, over 230 € will take home). Optically it is very good, clear enough at all focal lengths. For maximum goes diaphragmed least to f / 5.6. Personally I do not see it as a real defect counting that such a lens is shown for a photograph "relaxed" (tripod etc.) and therefore often use in apertures. It tolerates flare and does not present unmanageable aberrations. The build quality is there but not to the touch gives wonderful sensations. Autofocus noisy and pretty slow but precise (it works with the internal engine of the car). The front lens is rounded but allows the use of convenient screw filters. This distortion especially at 17mm but largely manageable. Recommended! sent on May 25, 2016 |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
