JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).

By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you have read your options regarding cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.

OK, I confirm

You can change in every moment your cookies preferences from the page Cookie Preferences, that can be reached from every page of the website with the link that you find at the bottom of the page; you can also set your preferences directly here

Accept Cookies

Customize

Refuse Cookies

Tamron AF 17-35mm f/2.8-4 Di Ld IF : Specifications and Opinions

Tamron AF 17-35mm f/2.8-4 Di Ld IF

The Tamron AF 17-35mm f/2.8-4 Di Ld IF is a wide-angle lens for FF and APS-C, discontinued. The focus is done by In-camera AF motor, it does not have image stabilization.

20 users have given it an average vote of 8.7 out of 10.

Specifications
Focal lenght	17-35 mm
Angle of view	103.7 - 63.5°
Format	FF, APS-C
Max. aperture	f/2.8
Aperture blades	7
Lenses/Groups	14 elements in 11 groups
Min. focus distance	0.3 meters
Reproduction ratio
Features
Zoom type	Ring, external
Stabilization	No
Focus	In-camera AF motor
Internal Focus	Yes
Built and notes
Tripod ring	No
Extenders	No
Filters	77 mm
Lens hood	Yes, supplied
Weather sealing	No
Weight	440 g
Dimensions	83 x 97 mm
Buy
Tamron AF 17-35mm f/2.8-4 Di Ld IF, buy on Ebay JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.

Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info)

Reviews

What do you think about this lens?

Do you want add your opinion? You do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!

There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments, join discussions and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 255000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.

The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.

AlbertoGiovanni

sent on October 05, 2017

Pros: Little cost, and a lens they have in a few, at 17mm and 'f2. 8

Cons: Responsiveness, construction, being not labeled Canon or Nikon and having no ultrasonic autofocus will be denigrated a priori

Opinion: As already stated, and an old generation Tamron, although optically knocking Canon's 17-40 and costing half is discarded, it would be sold for several years, slicing one of those slow loses and underestimating, certainly defects are not new: no constant brightness and plasticosarn construction (like having a big saloon with poor seats and utility tires)

Riccardomelzi

sent on October 17, 2016

Pros: Price range of focal

Cons: Construction, optical quality

Opinion: First serious evidence for this wide angle purchased at a very low price here on the forum. Original in good condition, tires a little discolored and some wear but perfect working condition and immacolate.rnAcquistato lenses for use on FF, explain that it is an experiment to see if these focal affect me and are functional for the genre i prefer (street and reportage) .rnAF noisy but discreet, the central point is not wrong, the side instead of on my 5D MkII suffer from pronounced front focus, so do not use them. At the center engages well in low light even better than the famed Tamron 24-70 f / 2.8, which possiedo.rnLa optical quality is Scarsini, TA throughout the frame is rather mixed and, as expected, the edges decade quality further. Good to f / 8 - f / 9.rnCostruzione just enough, my copy is free from games or malfunction and the ring flowing fluid, but the poverty of the materials, especially the exile lens hood, is well avvertibile.rnDistorsione important and aberrations, butwell correctable in CameraRaw, where I had the pleasant surprise to find the dedicated profile. Color a little bit dull and sometimes unsatisfactory contrast. I note no particular problems of flare.rnPersonalmente I found little usable in the field of street: the autofocus forces me to recompose, which is not always possible, and the quality of the images that returns, the openings necessary to ensure appropriate shutter speed to ' action, is not always satisfactory. Good for landscape photography: if diaphragmed and used quietly, perhaps on the tripod, you can bring home decent shots (certainly not without proper PP and sharpening galore) .rnConsigliato only for intermittent use without too many expectations: it costs for that that vale.rn

Thule

sent on August 23, 2016

Pros: Cheap, light, bright, compact size, profile on dedicated editing software, good autofocus, economic construction, but solid.

Cons: Reviewable sharpness, color a little 'off, sealing the backlight "brutal."

Opinion: Since you are gone (?) The old reviews put my. Had and scrambled for a year, what about ... enticed by the spectacular test of photozone (I do not know that he had been sent a copy, evidently an exemplary "particular") and some enthusiastic comments, given the availability to 200 Euros I got it now waiting for something better. Visually and physically I loved it, compact and lightweight, but these are not the things that matter .. The specimen in my possession was suffering from an internal reflection (large orange circle in center of frame) when pushed against the light (with sun in the frame). Sharpness a bit 'thick at all apertures and colors a bit' "autumn", extinguished, opachi.Usato at night (the Milky Way, landscapes by moonlight) I found it not bad, will be for the lack of contrast and colors much less influential. If you are looking for a view FF and landscape photography advice to give up, I would see him quite accomplished in key reportage and street combined with un'aps, given the good brightness and the optical characteristics that make it suitable for portraits. For a FF recommend use only if you look for a perspective for occasional use at night and do not want to spend three times more for a similar perspective (at this price has no competitors other than the Konika Minolta 17-35 which seems to have the same optical badged) or as spare car escort.

GabrieleBielli

sent on May 25, 2016

Pros: Sharp in the center at all apertures and focal, lightweight and compact. Monta filters screw 77mm diameter.

Cons: Crisp on the whole frame to f / 5.6 onwards, improved autofocus. economic construction to the touch.

Opinion: Great wide-angle zoom, with a quality / unbeatable price (it is now only used, over 230 € will take home). Optically it is very good, clear enough at all focal lengths. For maximum goes diaphragmed least to f / 5.6. Personally I do not see it as a real defect counting that such a lens is shown for a photograph "relaxed" (tripod etc.) and therefore often use in apertures. It tolerates flare and does not present unmanageable aberrations. The build quality is there but not to the touch gives wonderful sensations. Autofocus noisy and pretty slow but precise (it works with the internal engine of the car). The front lens is rounded but allows the use of convenient screw filters. This distortion especially at 17mm but largely manageable. Recommended!

Photos taken with Tamron AF 17-35mm f/2.8-4 Di Ld IF

The Magic Castle

by Firebird
20 comments, 2380 views

Oniris

by Rinogiacca
15 comments, 608 views

HI RES 23.2 MP

A meteor lights up the night sky.

by Elio Magnabosco
17 comments, 2923 views

HI RES 10.1 MP

Villa B. (2009)

by Firebird
15 comments, 2082 views

The House of the Spirits

by Firebird
16 comments, 1515 views

Alba Vernazza

by Riccardo.cervia
8 comments, 1035 views

Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info)

Manarola Mareggiata

by Riccardo.cervia
6 comments, 718 views

Paradise

by Rinogiacca
14 comments, 664 views

HI RES 19.8 MP

Paris - Tour Eiffel by Night

by Davide Espertini
7 comments, 3829 views

La Sala Dei Pavoni

by Firebird
7 comments, 1861 views

The Mansion In The Woods

by Firebird
5 comments, 1976 views

The Church of the pigeons

by Firebird
9 comments, 1851 views

Untitled Photo

by Rinogiacca
9 comments, 399 views

HI RES 20.5 MP

Lake San Pellegrino

by Igioele
2 comments, 2770 views

HI RES 13.5 MP

Camogli beach

by Franzmz
6 comments, 1843 views

HI RES 16.0 MP

Tell me my Lord

by Rinogiacca
4 comments, 396 views

HI RES 15.4 MP

"Hostel"

by Firebird
9 comments, 1628 views

Valley S.Niccolò

by Igioele
9 comments, 2361 views

HI RES 13.5 MP

Angry Sea

by Ezio Falco
4 comments, 1952 views

HI RES 9.2 MP

Suspended idea

by Rinogiacca
5 comments, 332 views

HI RES 20.0 MP

Startrais

by Elio Magnabosco
7 comments, 2158 views

Papillon

by Firebird
3 comments, 1061 views

Surgery

by Firebird
7 comments, 1097 views

Macro Wide Angle

by Landerjack
10 comments, 2601 views

Piazza Aulenti - Cyclist

by Landerjack
6 comments, 930 views

A Fairy Forest

by Porziolifrancesco
4 comments, 285 views

Vernazza Sunset

by Riccardo.cervia
0 comments, 579 views

Insanity Room

by Firebird
6 comments, 1105 views

Brothers almost Gemini

by Ezio Falco
3 comments, 1928 views

Vernazza rocks

by Riccardo.cervia
4 comments, 748 views

"Bramante Staircase"

by Firebird
1 comments, 882 views

Untitled Photo

by Rinogiacca
9 comments, 300 views

HI RES 22.0 MP

Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info)

Sofia

by Deathjack
5 comments, 655 views

HI RES 4.3 MP

Untitled Photo

by Rinogiacca
5 comments, 356 views

HI RES 12.4 MP

The cooks of Jamaa El Fna

by Italo Polce
1 comments, 437 views

HI RES 6.0 MP

Isola Piana

by Andreamontalbano
4 comments, 2363 views

HI RES 21.2 MP

Ferrari in Milan

by Landerjack
4 comments, 1576 views

The sample photos are selected automatically between all photos posted by JuzaPhoto members, using the camera and the lens selected in the techs. If you find evident errors (e.g. photos taken with cameras and lenses that are not available yet), you can contribute to improve the page by sending a private message to the user that has entered incorrect values in the photo caption.

Reviews » Lenses » Lenses Tamron » Tamron AF 17-35mm f/2.8-4 Di Ld IF

Tamron AF 17-35mm f/2.8-4 Di Ld IF : Specifications and Opinions

Buy

Offerte Usato RCE

Reviews

What do you think about this lens?

Photos taken with Tamron AF 17-35mm f/2.8-4 Di Ld IF