JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).
By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you accept the use of cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.
If you want, you can even enable or disable specific cookies on the page Cookies Preferences.
The Tamron AF 17-35mm f/2.8-4 Di Ld IF is a wide-angle lens for FF and APS-C, discontinued. The focus is done by In-camera AF motor, it does not have image stabilization. The average price, when it has been added to the JuzaPhoto database, is 250 €;
16 users have given it an average vote of 8.7 out of 10.
Do you want add your opinion? You do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments, join discussions and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 212000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.
Pros:Little cost, and a lens they have in a few, at 17mm and 'f2. 8
Cons:Responsiveness, construction, being not labeled Canon or Nikon and having no ultrasonic autofocus will be denigrated a priori
Opinion:As already stated, and an old generation Tamron, although optically knocking Canon's 17-40 and costing half is discarded, it would be sold for several years, slicing one of those slow loses and underestimating, certainly defects are not new: no constant brightness and plasticosarn construction (like having a big saloon with poor seats and utility tires)
Opinion:First serious evidence for this wide angle purchased at a very low price here on the forum. Original in good condition, tires a little discolored and some wear but perfect working condition and immacolate.rnAcquistato lenses for use on FF, explain that it is an experiment to see if these focal affect me and are functional for the genre i prefer (street and reportage) .rnAF noisy but discreet, the central point is not wrong, the side instead of on my 5D MkII suffer from pronounced front focus, so do not use them. At the center engages well in low light even better than the famed Tamron 24-70 f / 2.8, which possiedo.rnLa optical quality is Scarsini, TA throughout the frame is rather mixed and, as expected, the edges decade quality further. Good to f / 8 - f / 9.rnCostruzione just enough, my copy is free from games or malfunction and the ring flowing fluid, but the poverty of the materials, especially the exile lens hood, is well avvertibile.rnDistorsione important and aberrations, butwell correctable in CameraRaw, where I had the pleasant surprise to find the dedicated profile. Color a little bit dull and sometimes unsatisfactory contrast. I note no particular problems of flare.rnPersonalmente I found little usable in the field of street: the autofocus forces me to recompose, which is not always possible, and the quality of the images that returns, the openings necessary to ensure appropriate shutter speed to ' action, is not always satisfactory. Good for landscape photography: if diaphragmed and used quietly, perhaps on the tripod, you can bring home decent shots (certainly not without proper PP and sharpening galore) .rnConsigliato only for intermittent use without too many expectations: it costs for that that vale.rn
Pros:Cheap, light, bright, compact size, profile on dedicated editing software, good autofocus, economic construction, but solid.
Cons:Reviewable sharpness, color a little 'off, sealing the backlight "brutal."
Opinion:Since you are gone (?) The old reviews put my. Had and scrambled for a year, what about ... enticed by the spectacular test of photozone (I do not know that he had been sent a copy, evidently an exemplary "particular") and some enthusiastic comments, given the availability to 200 Euros I got it now waiting for something better. Visually and physically I loved it, compact and lightweight, but these are not the things that matter .. The specimen in my possession was suffering from an internal reflection (large orange circle in center of frame) when pushed against the light (with sun in the frame). Sharpness a bit 'thick at all apertures and colors a bit' "autumn", extinguished, opachi.Usato at night (the Milky Way, landscapes by moonlight) I found it not bad, will be for the lack of contrast and colors much less influential. If you are looking for a view FF and landscape photography advice to give up, I would see him quite accomplished in key reportage and street combined with un'aps, given the good brightness and the optical characteristics that make it suitable for portraits. For a FF recommend use only if you look for a perspective for occasional use at night and do not want to spend three times more for a similar perspective (at this price has no competitors other than the Konika Minolta 17-35 which seems to have the same optical badged) or as spare car escort.
Pros:Sharp in the center at all apertures and focal, lightweight and compact. Monta filters screw 77mm diameter.
Cons:Crisp on the whole frame to f / 5.6 onwards, improved autofocus. economic construction to the touch.
Opinion:Great wide-angle zoom, with a quality / unbeatable price (it is now only used, over 230 € will take home). Optically it is very good, clear enough at all focal lengths. For maximum goes diaphragmed least to f / 5.6. Personally I do not see it as a real defect counting that such a lens is shown for a photograph "relaxed" (tripod etc.) and therefore often use in apertures. It tolerates flare and does not present unmanageable aberrations. The build quality is there but not to the touch gives wonderful sensations. Autofocus noisy and pretty slow but precise (it works with the internal engine of the car). The front lens is rounded but allows the use of convenient screw filters. This distortion especially at 17mm but largely manageable. Recommended!
Photos taken with Tamron AF 17-35mm f/2.8-4 Di Ld IF
The sample photos are selected automatically between all photos posted by JuzaPhoto members, using the camera and the lens selected in the techs. If you find evident errors (e.g. photos taken with cameras and lenses that are not available yet), you can contribute to improve the page by sending a private message to the user that has entered incorrect values in the photo caption.
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.
