|
| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
Parolo Marco www.juzaphoto.com/p/ParoloMarco  |
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator. | Nikon AF DX 10.5mm f/2.8 G ED Fisheye Pros: Everything (see opinions below made by other users), are the same so I do not repeat. One thing I add, price of the used. Cons: Seeing opinions below made by other users are the same so I do not repeat. Opinion: For abstract and deformed artistic use nothing to say, excellent all-round lens. The price found in the used is great. I recommend it only for creative uses or to be used with underwater case or similar for photos where water is a problem. Great street lens focuses everything so just shoot and just torso level. Rating 10. sent on October 19, 2021 |
 | Nikon AF-S 50mm f/1.8 G Pros: Af, construction, colors details, compact, lightweight, blurred, backlight, cost,etc. (just see the photos it takes). Cons: For a use travel reportage, landscape, food and details in general, nothing to say (personal opinion given the uses I make of it). For pro use I do not express myself and I leave the floor to the experts. Opinion: As I said in the cons (use - travel reportage, etc.) it is phenomenal with Nikon D7200. In the pros I have said everything so I do not dwell too much, I would risk saying things said by others. Recommended and rating 10. PS. I also own Nikon 50 af.d f/1.8 which I use for other purposes. The comparison between the two cannot be made given the difference. Two different objectives with different character. sent on October 19, 2021 |
 | Tamron 2x TC-X20 Pros: Lightness, good quality when used with Aps cameras.c (reference to Nikon D7200 + Tamron 70-210 new), valid alternative to more pushed and more expensive telephoto lenses, does not create problems with af, reliable and accurate af (reference with my equipment D7200 + Tamron 70-210 new), tropicalized, cost. Cons: As for the product nothing to say. As for the product in my possession nothing to say. Opinion: The new Tamron duplicator I find better than its previous Tamron 2x SP AF Pro lent by a friend both for quality, construction and reliability at 360 ° with autofocus (used with Tamron 70-210 new). For the use I make: photographed birds (educational use - plumage and face details), landscape (mountain tops), the quality is excellent throughout the frame. Obviously I have to take into account that it closes the diaphragm of 2 stops making the canvas darker but it does not create problems with good light. Obviously for a professional use you choose something else, however, for a simple amateur photographer who does not want to spend a fortune with pro telephoto lens, it is more than fine. Recommended and deserves 10 vote. sent on October 19, 2021 |
 | Tamron 70-210mm f/4 Di VC USD Pros: Sharpness, light, compact (does not lengthen when in the zoom), tropicalized, minimum focus, cost of new Cons: Not supplied tripod mount. Opinion: Goal bought yesterday in the store. I was amazed by the size and lightness. Still to be tested properly, therefore, I will write further on my views on image quality and blurred in the various light conditions and situations. Pros and cons are hot opinions. I use this lens on Nikon D7200. I found "maybe" a defect in the focus, or a very light ct, difficult to hear but gives to think. Obviously on my specimen. Except that I'm not having autofocus or front or back focus issues. The focus is accurate and fast enough. I would like to ask by private message, and Nikon owners, if they also perceived when they focus, not in manual of course, that very light TAC. Thank you. Update 24/09/2018-VC, compatible with duplicators, hard enough nuts and fluid, excellent in backlight, chromatic aberration to TA absent, many distortions acceptable because they are minimal almost nil, AF fast QB in all situations even in the photos Night, handling, weight, no problem front or back focus (my specimen), AF not suitable for sports hunting, the TAC that I felt is physiological of the lens seems, in fact, that now no longer feel. The blurry at all apermi is very soft almost creamy, so suitable for portraits (for those who do them of course). AF compatible with extension tubes for more pushed macros (I only make close-up simple almost artistic, so I do not do text) but to those who can interested, good to know. The image quality is excellent up to the edges (on APS-C). sent on July 17, 2018 |
 | Nikon D3000 Pros: Pro: Great entry level for those who want to get started in the photography world, small and compact, extremely durable battery even after years of use, lightweight, robust, discrete but price-compliant performance. Cons: Against: AF that sometimes makes the whims and after the 800 ISO the machine starts to not hold the noise well, lack of live view, lack of bracketing which however throws beginners, no AF engine, lack of some quick adjustments. Opinion: The first serious camera I ever had before I was just a roller-coaster, fortunately I went to school with an Olympus OM 10 reflex to my father's roll, but as we all know, from a roll to the digital you open a world, at least for me being only a simple passionate. The only difference I have noticed is the solid, reliable and solid construction of the old school, which, compared to my little one, looks like a toy. As for the pros and cons I have already said it all. sent on October 15, 2017 |
 | Nikon AF-S DX 55-200mm f/4-5.6 G VR Pros: Pro: Sharpness, versatility, clutter, excellent blur, presence of the super - high, new price when I took it and now in use, focal length, weight, robustness, good image quality across the frame (price / performance). Cons: Cons: Building (obviously not a lens goal), dark, af and vr noisy, af uncertain and slow, minimal focus distance, TA aberrations, in general all these problems are accentuated in the dark, chromatic aberrations on strong contrasts . Opinion: Already said everything in pros and cons. School goal, so suitable for beginners who approach the telephoto world for the first time. I still have this lens and I use it now only on Nikon D3000, battle reflexes, for events and events (it draws little attention from those who have too long hands). The current version is currently on sale: Nikon AF-S DX 55-200mm f / 4-5.6G VR II at a very low price. sent on October 15, 2017 |
 | Nikon AF-S DX 18-55mm f/3.5-5.6 G VR Pros: Pro: Great price performance ratio, adequate rendering across the frame, good reproduction ratio, efficient VR, size, weight, stabilizer, precise and sharp AF, silent, 28cm minimum effective focus and very useful, very good flare resistance , 52mm filters. Cons: Cons: Brightness and design quality, manual focus ring very uncomfortable and inaccurate, autofocus a bit slow, front ring rotates with fire so you can not mount polarized filters except some, plastic bayonet, lack of bayonet seal. Opinion: Already said everything in pros and cons. Objective from school, as I call it, because it helped me to figure out what goals they were going to serve me later. I still have this lens and I use it now only on Nikon D3000, battle reflexes, for events and events (it draws little attention from those who have too long hands). sent on October 15, 2017 |
 | Nikon AF-S 85mm f/1.8 G Pros: Weight & dimensions, Sharp, Defocused, Fast and accurate Af, Tropicalization, Excellent full-aperture, Backlight Resistance, Great Contrast, Quality-Price Report, New Price, Materials, 67mm Filter provided. Cons: None Opinion: Used with the D7200, it delivers great photos with a good three-dimensionality. Blurry is great. The colors are very pleasing and creamy, so do not tire over time. The hood makes its worthy work especially during the day when the sun is difficult to interpret (windows, asphalt, glazed windows). The quality of the materials, for some can be plastic, for me is not a problem, because it saves on the weight mostly used all day off. Never tried on FF, so I can not describe the merits or defects because I have no direct experience. On DX I would advise you if you want to save, especially because of your older brother f / 1.4. I did not encounter front or back focus problems at least on my specimen. Voting 10. sent on July 26, 2017 |
 | Tamron 10-24mm f/3.5-4.5 Di II VC HLD Pros: Sharpness even to the edges, fast and quiet Af, Stabilizer, Construction, Bayonet Inflatable, Flare Resistance, Weight & Dimension, Tropicalization, 77mm Filters, Front Cap (Good Latch) without risk of losing it, Great yield on 24mp sensor, Which does his worthy work. Price compliant with quality and performance. Cons: Lights in a rest position that does not allow you to zoom in. Opinion: Taken this morning at the store without having to order it. The first cold impressions of use on the Nikon d7200 can only be positive, fit in hand, a sense of professionalism from Tamron, both in construction and materials used in achieving this goal. Excellent flare resistance (photographed in strong sunlight with direct sunlight on the lens - as if I tried to photograph a silhouette). Very small distortion at 10mm. I still need to test it out to be able to understand both positive and negative notes. The only negative note I have found is that mounting the hood on a rest position can not physically zoom in and consequently forces you to take it away with the risk of losing it. The use of the hood is, however, compulsory if you want to have the best of the day's yield. RnBrowse your purchase if you want to spend a little and get the maximum yield on aps-c. Voting 10. sent on July 25, 2017 |
 | Nikon D7200 Pros: Body pro and pro controls, iso hold to be a 24MP, photo quality, dynamic range, tropicalization, af even in the dark, internal af drive, the ability to use lenses without cpu, dual sd slot, crop 1.3x, customization commands, durability Battery, no low pass filter, PdC preview, etc. Cons: Incredible live view, lack of sled cover, lack of high-visibility metering. Opinion: What to say, a great car for those who want to make a jump of quality. Excellent ISO up to 3200 (then depends on taste). Great handle and improves with the addition of BG. Great files with the ability to recover on the shadows (obviously avoid impossible recovery) say up to 1 / 1.5 stop. Some have complained about the dirty sensor but personally the seals do their job, so they never had problems. The AF is fast and accurate even in night scenes. The burst could be improved, but it's not a problem for me. If I want to take photographic hunting I go to the D500. Excellent battery life. Possibility to use non-cpu lenses with the use of spot exposure. It is useful to crop 1.3x that is a plus push on the canvas (obviously it is a cutout and consequently decrease the pixels about 16mp). Great customization of commands. Stra recommended. To vote for me 10. sent on July 21, 2017 |
 | Nikon AF 50mm f/1.8 D Pros: Lightweight, precise, sharp, chromatic, economical, size, exquisite material, blurry, 52mm filters, chromatic aberrations contained. Cons: No grommet on the bayonet, hood available separately in both plastic and metal. Opinion: As for the pros, I would add no more. Suitable for my tastes, close street and portraits. With the addition of extension pipes there is a modest macro lens, but not comparable to a real macro objective. As for the counter, I was amazed at the lack of the bayonet and lumbar grommet available separately. We say it does not cost so much, considering the savings on the new lens, its price is around (15/20 euro) (metal version). I recommend buying. Voting 10. sent on July 20, 2017 |
 | Nikon AF-S DX 35mm f/1.8 G Pros: Weight, size, af for landscapes and portraits, full time mf, filters diameter 52, suitable for cameras aps.c. New price Cons: No Vr, but for the weight that is is not a problem. Chromatic aberrations easily corrected in pp. Light construction but not a problem. Opinion: I advise buying this goal to those who own an ace. Easy to use and has great value for money. Many people complain about the fleece, maybe I was lucky, I do not find a lot of flax. As I said it is great for landscapes, streets, portraits. I like blurry, in my soft view. The chromatic aberrations are few and easily eliminable with two clicks in pp. Vote 10 for me. sent on July 20, 2017 |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
