|
| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
Trx400 www.juzaphoto.com/p/Trx400  |
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator. | Tamron SP 70-300mm f/4-5.6 Di VC USD Pros: Clarity, soundness, value for money, excellent stabilizer Cons: A little heavy. Hood too flashy, zoom ring for me uncomfortable. Opinion: The use of 6d. For the price it's a great goal. Very sharp. It loses a little bit around 300 but nothing serious. The stabilizer is very effective and fast-focusing lens (not to the levels of 70 200 is f 4 canon that I tried for a long time). The thing I like least is the forward position of the zoom ring, for me uncomfortable. I would have preferred that the fire far and the zoom as close on canon.rnIn synthesis, for less than 300 € you can not ask for more of this type of lens. sent on September 10, 2015 |
 | Fujifilm Finepix X20 Pros: Beautiful; metal body that has a solid feel. Goal very bright, stabilized and with a range of focal lengths (28-105 corresponding) very extensive. Quality of files fantastic. Excellent color rendering. Optical viewfinder. Cons: Battery life. Viewfinder improvable. Opinion: I bought this compact to have a small car and discreet to carry around but sfornasse good pictures. I state that I own a Canon 6D and I had 7D, 40D and 450D, and I must say that the image quality of this fuji pleasantly surprised me. The jpg are great and even better raw. I think with the size of this sensor you can hardly do better. rnInoltre is a machine very funny also given the opportunity to set the simulations of various films fujifilm.rnLa thing that struck me the most, thinking about the canon, is the accuracy in automatic white balance and outdoors but mostly indoors with artificial light . The Fuji is very much better. I'd be curious to try the XT1.rnIn conclusion are satisfied with the purchase given the cost of the used (bought used less than 300 euro). I would not spend twice about for the new X30. sent on December 15, 2014 |
 | Canon 6D Pros: Output image quality, especially at high sensitivity; wi-fi and GPS; silent shooting mode; central point autofocus sensitive. Good viewfinder. Cons: Lack of joystick, buttons on the left side of the LCD screen and built-in flash. Opinion: Using this camera for three months, I come from the 7D. Of this I am missing several things, basically the joystick and button layout in the back. Display images in the LCD screen during playback to me is more uncomfortable with the new layout of the controls. I also lack the built-in flash very useful to control other flash estrerni addition to the most advanced system of autofocus and burst. Having said that the files produced by 6D are better, sharper images in low sensitivity and much less noisy at high sensitivity. Very convenient connectivity wi-fi. Rarely use the GPS. The viewfinder of the FF is obviously bigger and piacevole.rnUsando this machine to do almost exclusively architectural photography, the biggest difference I noticed compared to 'APSC, are in post-production of the raw files. With 6D recovery of the shadows and the processing of the file in general the results are very migliori.rnApprezzo the shutter with silent mode (in 6D is verambody quieter) that produces less vibration and sound in my opinion the most pleasant. rnih nutshell, for static and low light photography, the council 6D. For all the rest the 7D is more versatile. sent on December 15, 2014 |
 | Tokina AT-X Pro 11-16mm f/2.8 DX Pros: Build quality, sharpness, 2.8 Cons: Resistance to flare; chromatic aberrations Opinion: I own this' optical mount canon for several years; then used before on 40D 7D. Used mainly for architectural photography. I could not compare it directly with other lenses of the same focal length but it is definitely better than my kit lens for sharpness, strength and fluidity of the rings. Especially on the 7D is considerable difference to other lenses (eg with canon 17-85). RnLe distortion and chromatic aberrations are corrected easily in PP, care must be taken especially for backlight and light sources in interni.rnIl My final verdict is great, the reduced focal length is amply rewarded by the brightness fixed at 2.8. sent on June 08, 2014 |
 | Canon 7D Pros: solidity and construction, customization commands, good viewfinder, operating speed, autonomy, control of external flashes wirelessly. Cons: shutter sound and vibration, noisy files that require careful post-production, suffers with poor optics. Opinion: I own this car for a few months, bought used (practically new) to replace the 40D that has done its job very well for several years. Compared to the latter the improvements we've seen so far are varied: the best LCD screen and viewfinder, autofocus system much more powerful though quite complex in the development, improved performance at high ISO, more resolution, ability to control external flashes in wireless; gust faster and battery life definitely superiore.rnIl strong point of this machine is its versatility, even if their best in photography dynamics (sports, etc.), gives good results in other applications as long as use quality lenses and get some attention during the shooting, in the sense that probably due to the sensor hyperdense, daughters errors and defects of the photographer's lens can be seen in più.rnLa thing I do not like it, as with all Canon digital except 5D III and Series 1, is the shot: Too much vibration and itsno plasticky. Best Nikon questo.rnLa 7D is a great car for me, the best APSC I've tried and seen the price at which it is used to recommend; being able to spend more obviously better to switch to acting, which for photography is static another mondo.rn sent on December 19, 2013 |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
