JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).
By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you accept the use of cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.
The Tokina AT-X Pro 11-16mm f/2.8 DX is a wide-angle lens for APS-C, manufactured from 2007 to 2012 (discontinued). The focus is done by Lens AF motor (non-ultrasonic), it does not have image stabilization. The average price, when it has been added to the JuzaPhoto database, is 620 €;
47 users have given it an average vote of 9.2 out of 10.
Do you want add your opinion? You do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments, join discussions and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 200000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.
Cons:Exaggerated flares, chromatic aberrations in special conditions, noisy self-focus
Opinion:I took this lens found at a heist price on ebay. I use it in conjunction with the D7500 and D3300 (with manual focus, since the autofocus engine is not in the lens, which relies on that of the machine body). Despite the now venerable age, it still churns out some very beautiful rows, personally I love the chromatic rendering, especially when combined with a good polarizing filter. Self-focusing on these focal points may not be often needed, but it is very quick (albeit noisy). You get files with good sharpness, they don't fear the 24 mpx at all, not bad for a lens built when the machines it's aimed at had an average of 12 mpx. The construction is excellent, used in difficult conditions has never betrayed me. I like less, however, the suffering to do really exaggerated, it is normal that on focals so the flare is a problem, but on Tokina is really exaggerated, and in addition they turn out huge. Sometimes he suffers from chromatic aberrations. Overall it's still a very good goal, grade 8.
Pros:Robust, crisp, maf, the price used, 2.8 x low light
Cons:flare but no worries.
Opinion:It 'was my first lens after the classic 18-55 kit. They 'almost always mounted, 90% of my photos were made with this fantastic wide-angle. I use it for two years even with closed eyes. It 'clear to all diaphragms, but to really !! maf manual or in af, precise, rarely misses a shot. The 2.8 is useful for darker rooms where SDo you can mount the tripod (like museums, etc.). Like all wide-angle suffer from flare but we are talking about extreme focal lengths and is (almost) inevitable, though carefully and sparingly you can find other pdr during shooting and avoid flare. For the money is now used vehicle is a bargain .... (max 300 €) .rnrnPer lovers Straconsigliato landscapes.
user63386
sent on June 02, 2016
Pros:Bright and sharp. When used properly the distortion is imperceptible.
Cons:Hood a bit 'poor
Opinion:It took a couple of days, is giving me only joy. Bucking say that resists well to flare (I'm lucky I got the pictures in full backlighting spotless) Closing a bit 'the diaphragm becomes crystal clear even at the edges. Returns of beautiful colors well contrasted. Very few chromatic aberrations, vignetting almost absent. I caught a glimpse of a hood used .. so 'homemade' side and repaired. Indeed, it seems a bit 'weakling. For me however, is a gem!
Opinion:Ultrawide light quality, excellent interior freehand, landscape, night, stars ... Weight and construction demonstrate a degree of build quality, performance of the lens are excellent. Beware flare, avoid direct light sources to frame. Unfortunately subject to breaking the flex cable that carries the information to the diaphragm (as on some Canon 24-105), issue to be settled in the Netherlands requires shipment to the service center and approximately € 150, more than a month without a lens ... Many indicate variability in the quality of construction, perhaps the problem of the whole production Tokina: my example, after the replacement of the flex cable, works smoothly churning pictures sharp and focused at all times
Pros:Excellent brightness, quality of construction, solidity, not cheap but the price just in proportion to the yield lente.Ottima cromatica.Obiettivo nice to see at least me.Ottima made with polarizer APSC.
Cons:Flare, can not stand very high lights, almost impossible to mount polarizer on FF.
Opinion:I am a happy owner of this lens for several years and I keep it mounted on APSC is almost always that you have understood even ff ff canon 6 d works very well, canon 650 d APSC works wonders on both gorgeous colors perhaps with a slight tendency to cold, being in contrast with canon that tends to hot this produces a good connubio.Inutile say that about ff, 16 f and a nice grandangolo.Non possible use of ff focal 11,12,13,14, 15,16 the focal si.Certo buy it now Tokina 16-28/2.8 ATX Pro-FX (IF), but then I did not think you can go ff and use this lens, pleasant surprise.
The sample photos are selected automatically between all photos posted by JuzaPhoto members, using the camera and the lens selected in the techs. If you find evident errors (e.g. photos taken with cameras and lenses that are not available yet), you can contribute to improve the page by sending a private message to the user that has entered incorrect values in the photo caption.
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.
![[editors pick]](shared_files/layout/ep_badge.jpg){kind=icon}
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.
