|
| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
Magno.f www.juzaphoto.com/p/Magno.f  |
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator. | Canon PowerShot S95 Pros: Exposure excellent. Good image quality. Rugged and compact. Raw. Good to keep it with them. Cons: Maybe it has little grip in his hands. Opinion: Truly a beautiful machine, not just donated ok, but it does its job very well. Exposure very effective, autofocus good for the category. Excellent screen. Good battery life. Very clever if one takes in raw + jpeg can then decide whether to delete only one or all 2. Fits easily into a pocket of his jeans. I am very satisfied. sent on March 30, 2013 |
 | Canon EF-S 15-85mm f/3.5-5.6 IS USM Pros: 24-136 equivalent size and weight reasonable, af fast and quiet, good image quality, still has no real competitors, building effective Cons: Brightness, price, vignetting Opinion: It 's my handyman. Not excellent brightness makes up for with the excellent stabilizer, but obviously can not offer exceptional blurred. Sticker to 15 and large openings but it is a problem easily solved in PP. It allows you to make any general photographic output with a single goal, almost certain that you have enough, especially from the side angle. In fact, his 24 equivalents are a beautiful thing especially for those who love the landscape, will not be disturbed by the tendency to vignettare using small apertures. The building is obviously not "L" but is quite good overall. Unfortunately, the price is a little higher end, looking at how you can even come close to 600. A great lnte I can not help but recommend. To stay in canon its natural competitor is the 17-55, but it costs almost twice as much, if you do not require large apertures the 15-85 has a good reason to be bought. sent on October 04, 2011 |
 | Canon EF 70-200mm f/4.0 L USM Pros: Light, crisp, very cheap compared to the services offered, robust Cons: No Opinion: I bought this lens used for an honorable figure. Has an optical quality exaggerated than what I expected. It 's very light and versatile, also mounted on a body as light as my 450 is well balanced. I think the constant aperture f4 is not to be considered as a defect because it offers in exchange for two things alone are worth the second lot, a fair price and a ratio dimensions / weight unbeatable. A lens very successful in my opinion. sent on September 25, 2011 |
 | Canon 450D Pros: Easy to use, you hold-lights-takes aim at once with one hand having all the main controls on the right, light, strong enough, good to learn, excellent autonomy, has live view, despite his age Cons: Small body and not in material "grippy" as the 7d, I'd had the slides with the grid, it lacks the video mode Opinion: E 'was and still is my first SLR, bought used for a digit and used very honorable and satisfactory manner. Basically (and obviously) does not excel in anything but it's all the same and with dignity. Before I had a bridge that now deny and I regret that it has taken (especially I regret having lost a lot of money), I immediately took the relex .. If he had the body 1cm taller it would be perfect and would have a better handle especially for long lenses. And maybe if it were of a material similar to 7d .. But for what it costs I'm not complaining of course, I'm enjoying the 100% yet and any investment for the time being direct to the optics, the body is still ok! I can only recommend it to those looking for a good compromise for money to start but not only. sent on August 22, 2011 |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
