|
| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
Alberto.domanda www.juzaphoto.com/p/Alberto.domanda  |
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator. | Nikon AF-S 58mm f/1.4 G Pros: bokeh and blurred to say the least incredible, versatility, lightness Cons: Autofocus not really fast, price Opinion: With this lens I had a particular relationship, using it for weddings, at the beginning I had a bit of a hard time getting used to the autofocus (used to using the Nikon 85 1.4G). Compared to the 85 it is certainly less rapid and slightly less precise, but once you take the hand, this lens has given me incredible satisfaction. I am literally in love with the almost magical effect that the photos taken at full aperture have, the blur and bokeh are incredible. The focal length is really versatile, you can use it for almost everything. sent on February 26, 2023 |
 | Nikon D610 Pros: Images to ISO 6400 used safely, tropicalization, compactness, lightness, strength, image quality, low price to be FF, unbeatable value for money, the central point of focus good Cons: AF points are too close but honestly you get used Opinion: I own this camera body for a few months, I have to say that the sensor is fantastic (of course not at the level of the D800 at low ISO) and in my opinion for a FF body the number of megapixels is perfect just 24, the sensor in this way is not too dense and files not weigh like boulders (unlike the D800). For those who want a FF camera body without having to pay an absurd figure is the perfect camera body, straconsigliata. Now there is also the D750 improve it would seem that in many ways (AF and held high ISO) but it costs a few hundred Euros. the choice is yours: D sent on February 28, 2015 |
 | Nikon AF-S 70-200mm f/2.8 G ED VR II Pros: EVERYTHING (except weight) Cons: Weight Opinion: A fantastic lens excellent in every aspect of view ... perfect for portraits ... I'd say the only negative is the peso..abbinato body FF and flash slide gets really tiring circled after not too long ... even the cost of the new lens is high but fortunately I managed to find it used ... other flaws I found none ... the best qualities are definitely blurred and sharpness to TA sent on January 30, 2015 |
 | Nikon AF-S 85mm f/1.8 G Pros: Image quality, blurred spectacular, lightness, brightness, sharpness already in TA, Cons: Chromatic aberrations at TA Opinion: Very fast lens (f / 1.8), image quality really good with a spectacular blurred (between 1.8 and 2.8 is gorgeous) ... the sharpness is very good already in TA .... between the lenses I have is what I like most in TA (only negative chromatic aberrations are present) does not miss a shot the focus is always perfect in almost every condition ... the lens is very light when mounted on the camera body almost does not feel .. .eppure images that churns out are amazing ... I would say that value for money is great ... the older brother 85 1.4 cost too much (three times !!!!!) ... rnPer those wishing to buy a 85 mm this lens rest assured that you are sure !!!!! rn sent on January 30, 2015 |
 | Sigma 35mm f/1.4 DG HSM Art Pros: Aperture 1.4, robust construction, resistance to flare, sharpness (af 1.4 is already very good), quality of the blur, quality / price ratio Cons: AF is not always accurate in low light conditions, vignetting obvious to TA Opinion: Possessor of this lens for a few months, luckily my copy has no front / back focus ... So the first positive note is certainly the aperture diaphragms so ... you can take to open allows you to take in terms of light really poor ... I own both the D610 and the D800 with both behaves very well ... we must be careful, however, to the depth of field in the case of taking close (but not too) shooting at TA is really low ... RNLA construction of the lens is very good to see it looks like a Zeiss, has good resistance to flare and blur is very nice ... the sharpness is already very good at 1.4 and continuing to close becomes incredible ... rnLe negative notes (at least for my copy) are an imprecise autofocus in low light conditions and a strong vignetting at TA (correctable in post production) ... rnIl weight is felt lighter than I thought it was, to use with FF and body mounted flash is not its light ... but d 'On the other hand the robustness weighs: DrnNel overall a great lens, but we must take a little 'hand to take in the diaphragms of between 1.4 and 1.8 in certain situations ... closing 2.8 onwards becomes a lens monstrous !!! !! sent on January 30, 2015 |
 | Nikon AF-S 50mm f/1.8 G Pros: Brightness, sharpness, blur, AF fast and accurate, light weight, small size Cons: I honestly do not seem to find Opinion: Quest'obbiettivo is of excellent quality despite the use of a nikon D3100 results are great ... it is bright and usable already in TA, very sharp, blur pleasant, fast AF and accurate, it is very light you do not even notice that you have a lens mounted, the footprint is minimal. used on APS-C is perfect for portraits. Really a great lens at a great price ... for those who are not in possession of fixed optics is a lens that would absolutely recommend sent on April 16, 2014 |
 | Tamron SP 70-300mm f/4-5.6 Di VC USD Pros: Stabilizer crazy, colors, blur, image quality, good coverage of focal lengths Cons: lack custody, on a tripod low level to the focal length of 300 mm is not very firmly due to the weight ... not just silent auto focus and stabilizer Opinion: The construction of the lens is good (keep in mind that as far as I was used to the telephoto zoom Nikon 55-200 DX) the weight begins to be felt but not excessive. The sharpness and image quality are excellent and also the longer focal length does not seem to me that there is this big drop as it was. The colors are bright and very pleasant blur the 9 blades are felt. The precise focus is not always perfect but sometimes mistakes while the stabilizer is great I would say that 3 stop more you allow them a few times I even managed to make the shots to the focal length of 150 mm (APS-C) with time 1/13 of a second where you do not notice the blur. The size with the lens hood is remarkable, especially for me that I was accustomed to other objectives. The housing of the lens is unfortunately not included. the stabilizer is a bit 'noisy but patience ... rnSecondo me is the best mid-range telephoto zoom and bearing in mind that costs 300 € recommend it to everyone sent on April 16, 2014 |
 | Nikon D3100 Pros: Price / quality, lightweight, compact, battery life, easy to use Cons: over 800 ISO noise evident, definition display with too low to embarrassing levels compared to other camera bodies, only 11 points of focus, image quality is not comparable to those of the upper level. Lack bracketing and lack of auto focus in the camera body Opinion: Bought in September 2012 when I decided to enter the world of SLR is the camera body that I still use now. The body weighs very little and is not cluttered at all convenient to carry around, the photo quality with fixed lenses arrive already at a very respectable considering what it costs. Regarding the ISO above 800 is definitely better not to climb the noise becomes too obvious. The display has a definition so low that I could not tell if the pictures are blurred or not ... Recommend to anyone who wants to enter the world of DSLR on a budget. As for me after a year and a half I start to feel "tight" ... although first of all I have to improve my kit lenses sent on March 01, 2014 |
 | Nikon AF-S DX 18-105mm f/3.5-5.6 G ED VR Pros: Good all-round, good sharpness, light Cons: hood, distortion at 18 mm, low light Opinion: How do you lens all great considering what it costs, the sharpness is decent and it's a lightweight lens. The lens hood (maybe it's a fault of my goal) engages without being completely stopped. Shooting is 18 mm and 105 mm there is distortion loses some 'quality. When indoors is definitely not luminoso.rnComplessivamente is a lens that the board instead of the usual 18-55 having regard to its superior versatility. sent on February 25, 2014 |
 | Nikon AF-S DX 40mm f/2.8 G Micro Pros: Economic, sharpness, light, blurred Cons: 40 mm (60 for me that I own APS-C body) are sometimes a few Opinion: I would say that to be a lens that costs only 200 € is of excellent quality, the sharpness is very good on APS-C and I am comfortable using it not only for the macro. The 40 mm (60 on APS-C) every now and then is not enough. Only drawback is that my lens every now and then especially when I try to open the aperture to 2.8 to 3.0 crashes. Overall, for those who want to bring the world of macro without spending too much I can say that is a lens that most valid sent on February 25, 2014 |
 | Nikon AF-S DX 35mm f/1.8 G Pros: High clarity, good focus, lightness, brightness, and decidedly low price Cons: Ring focus, lens hood serves only ridiculous not to take shots of the lens Opinion: I purchased this lens 2 months ago, I am very well use it for landscapes, street to portraits, to the flowers and also for the photos to the starry sky in short, everything here is fine for some major advantages for me that I was accustomed to the 18-55 kit are two: The first is the large brightness (F/1.8) which I think is essential for a lens and the second is definitely alta.rnLa quality sharpening the focus ring is all ' other than exceptional and the hood is almost inutile.rnPer what it costs is a lens that I recommend to tutti.rn sent on January 17, 2013 |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
