|
| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
RiccardoBucchino www.juzaphoto.com/p/RiccardoBucchino  |
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator. | Nikon AF 105mm f/2 D DC Pros: Constructive and optical quality Cons: It should be used from f / 2.2 (I use it on D810) Opinion: At f / 2 is not great, 2.2 things change completely and becomes clear, at 2.5 even better, I usually use it at 2.5. Given its long focal length and the absence of VR combined with a AF that is very good but not comparable to the new AFs (professional ones) it is quite difficult to have perfectly still images in poor lighting conditions but when it stops is crazy, sharp not in the way of new goals because it is not ultra-contrasted so it is a "latent sharpness" however with minimal post processing it comes out all and really amazes. The blur is soft and the soft colors of this lens create in the blurry areas of the beautiful pastel colors, the light spots come bellerrimi! I use it almost exclusively for ceremonies and even in those only in conditions where the subjects are fairly static. rnrnE 'a portrait optic, this is undeniable, but used for closed diaphragm views is a blade, af / 11 has a quality%3B superlative, is practically free of vignetting and optical distortions are zero. Is not an optician for every day? No, it is not at all. Have you tried other 105 unstable and believe they are stupid and think you can use it in critical light without any problem? You are terribly wrong, this does not forgive any mistakes in your own, or in the car! But when the pictures that come well repay all the effort they need to accomplish them. Not recommended for those who do not have much experience and are highly advised to others, one of the optics you have to have. RnrnThe defocus ... bah, never used unless for testing. sent on September 16, 2017 |
 | Nikon D800 Pros: Autofocus, resolution, exposure improved (compared previous series), White balance Automatic improved (useful in changing light conditions, reports, etc), workability files, recover shadows and highlights, solid body, made at high ISO and above color rendering at high iso. Cons: The second slot is SD and CF, less ergonomic grip for those with large hands than the D700 and D810 Opinion: Almost perfect machine for most of the professional use, the use for anything from reportage of events at weddings to travel and always rewarding, I think the D810 has corrected some defects and added some useful function (weighted exposure mode on the high lights, burst faster, sRAW, handle better, absence of AA filter, etc) and is the perfect camera for my taste but the D800 is still a good fotocamera.rnI heavy files of D800 are lavorabilissimi with any PC, even with the tablet ( Surface Pro 3) will work like a dream. sent on February 23, 2015 |
 | Manfrotto 410 Pros: Precision, Solid construction, quick release plate-reliable Cons: Weight, Limited upward rotation (only 30 °), A polar temperatures oils librificanti internal harden Opinion: Can not help it, it is much more practical and quick to use than the heads 3-way, do not have to constantly unlock and relock anything, you just have to turn the ring, unlock movements for large displacements is very fast. RNE 'a perfect head for the still life, macro (coupled with sleds micrometer), landscape, architecture and any other clearly exclude the sport and hunting which are definitely more suitable heads Rocker. RNA polar temperatures oils librificanti interior and harden around -30 ° C dials micrometer become very hard to turn, some are locked, my 410 worked to -30, hardened but usable, one of my friend already at -24 had one of the movements totally bloccato.rnLa RC4 quick release plate in my opinion is the best, very safe and very quick to engage (the ark requires more attention during the engagement, the supports RC4 and is anchored), is large then the camera / optics will not rotate if ever involuntarilyvete tight the screw. I never found any of the games with plates in my possession. rnrnLa my fall is knocking on the plate complete with a tripod (055XPROB) attacked by more than 1 meter in height (on tiles, no soft ground) and did not suffer any damage, even aesthetic, precise as always, is a tank, virtually indistruttibile.rnCe I since 2009, is perfect as the first day. sent on December 16, 2014 |
 | Nikon AF-S 35mm f/1.8G Pros: light, crisp already in TA, af fast and accurate, compact, goes unnoticed, in the blurred light spots are really nice and round without "nested pores" Cons: Blurred a bit '"rough" than for example the sigma 35 1.4 Article Opinion: In my opinion the plastic outer construction is not a major flaw, the optics is very light and therefore does not require a magnesium frame to withstand the normal sollecitaizoni due to the use, the plastic is of high quality and very solid, the baioentta is steel inox.rnrnLa quality is really good already wide open even on very dense sensors yield is excellent, compared the performance of the sigma Art in blurred lights is better (shot more rounds with less chromatic aberration) but the fuzzy is less soft. rnHo preferred to the nikon sigma especially for the huge difference in weight (Sigma weighs more than twice) and for the better autofocus, it is a perspective that I consider as reportage and then read out by light weight and excellent af for me are fundamental in a 35mm fixed. sent on September 22, 2014 |
 | Nikon AF 20mm f/2.8 D Pros: Little distortion to be a 20mm, size and weight, high sharpness between 5.6 and 11 Cons: Slight vignetting, loss of quality at the edges wide open Opinion: The 20mm af-d is an ideal lens for architectural photography and paesaggio.rnIl its definitely better from the f / 8, in that the diaphragm is extremely sharp, a lower aperture to f / 4, the yield is certainly softer but it is also a utilizzabilissimo all apertura.rnLa lens is equipped with the CRC so even on close subjects has an excellent performance, it is blurred ottimo.rnrnSu DX vignetting is virtually absent, the vignetting on FX in some cases you do not see but nothing that can be corrected with trivial commands in the post 20mm produzione.rnrnIl favorably direct the flare, ie when the sun is in the frame, but does not have a good relationship with the flare from stray light because the lens hood is not always able to shield stray light for all because of the convex shape of the frontali.rnrnIl 20mm lens has a 62mm filter ring door, on the right we mounted a polarizer at random and all goes well, on fx the problem is not simple, polarizers 62mm slim also increase the vvignettatura, the My advice is quello to buy a Chinese thin ring to mount 77mm filters (why 77? 77mm because you can adapt them or mount directly to the 99% of the lenses on the market) and a filter polarizzaotre 77, so that the metal edges of the polarizer is not aggiongeranno vignetting in the corners, the filters for the FF on a wide-angle lens so must be of a quality, those from my tests from the best results are definitely the B + W MRC SLIM (also the KSM that is with gasket d ' water) and the Marumi Super Circular, the latter has the same quality as B + W, slightly increases the risk of flare because it has anti-glare u ntrattamento less effective than b + w but in return sticker lot, but much less than b + w. sent on October 04, 2011 |
 | Nikon D700 Pros: Extraordinary, in any situation, from sports to the landscape macro or any other kind of photography D700 gets along very well! Cons: The battery life is quite limited when compared to other machines using the same battery (EN-EL3a). It should be used only with quality lenses because if there mediocre lenses mounted the D700 will display all the flaws! Opinion: The sharpness of the images coming out of this machine is absolutely awesome and I before I had a semi-pro, a D80 and at constant aperture lens and the image quality is significantly higher, it is one of those cars that makes you understand that the megapixel count much less than the quality of the filters on the sensor. D700 is excellent at high ISO up to 4000 ISO gets along very well and also to 6400 shots are anything but to be thrown away. What kind of world would it be without D700? sent on July 29, 2011 |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
