|
| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
Alemalva www.juzaphoto.com/p/Alemalva  |
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator. | Canon EF 28-70mm f/2.8 L USM Pros: Quality, as far as I'm concerned already very good even af ??2.8 Cons: Old age and the risk that assistance should go in and not get the parts Opinion: I purchased-used - a year ago (August 2012) this fantastic lens and by the time I use it on a small formats (Canon 50D). Already at first glance you see the second of the feeling of strength and reliability that can give you an objective "L" series. RnHa considerable weight, but it is taken into account. Even at full aperture (f 2.8) as far as I file produces beautiful, with a great cromacità and sharpness. The blur is very pleasant. It 's my lens tuttofare.rnNon I can compare it with his successors 24-70 I and II, but I can compare it with the Tamron 28-75 f 2.8 which, although honest does not come close to Canon. The weight is quite different, the autofocus motor is better to Tamron, although not shine for speed, especially in low-luce.rnTirando sums, it is a great lens, if you can buy at a good price is to be taken, the risk is that it does not break because (they say) that there are more spare parts. sent on July 30, 2013 |
 | Tamron 28-75mm F/2.8 XR Di LD Pros: bright, minimum focusing distance, price, quality lens Cons: unusable wide open, system focus embarrassing to say the least, lack of adjustment to manual focus when in autofocus Opinion: It 'a lens that has a quality / price ratio very good, I bought it for 2.8 hours but I must say that TA is so soft that the pillow where I sleep in comparison is made of marble! However, some closing stop the lens becomes a real blade, made amends abundantly its softness and its motor (ino-ino eh!) Focus: slow, noisy and inaccurate (especially in the absence of a good deal of light). It's not really macros, but has a minimum distance that you can still make decent enlargements. Summing up I can recommend it, as long as there are weapons of patience ... My vote is seven sent on October 25, 2011 |
 | Canon EF 70-200mm f/4.0 L USM Pros: say that it is superbly sharp is little ... Cons: missing the stabilizer, but is the economy version Opinion: I have just this great canvas, has a truly amazing sharpness, a motor accurately and quickly, the weight is content, the focus is also excellent. For the price of course could not have even the stabilizer, the version stab it costs much more (except offers sensational). I think it's the right price for the quality that has, on the other hand, the stable version I think it's a little expensive, since List costs almost twice as much. Another point absolutely to consider is that if one wants to do an "upgrade" and buy the 2.8 or stabilized, it sells and the price remains on tranquillamento. sent on September 26, 2011 |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
