|
| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
Giovibalti www.juzaphoto.com/p/Giovibalti  |
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator. | Sony FE 85mm f/1.4 GM II Pros: Sharpness, focusing and locking speed, blurry, quite light and compact. Cons: Maybe the price even if it costs less than the one suggested on juza, I got it at 1850€ and it's the price that a couple of shops have made me. Opinion: Taken yesterday, I'm still trying it but I must say that it is really good, it returns excellent images, correct colors (on A7r5) and pleasant. It hooks the eye instantly and does not lose it, I don't see any chromatic abbreviations and if there are they are really ridiculous, very nice blur, circular points of light and without onion effect, perhaps a hint of F4. I reserve the right to change my opinion by doing other tests but I don't think I will change it. sent on February 02, 2025 |
 | Sony FE 135mm f/1.8 GM Pros: everything, it's pretty much perfect Cons: price, but for the quality it is justified, you are worth all the € spent Opinion: For me a perfect lens, it has everything you could want from a 135, paired with the A7r4 has a frightening sharpness. At the end of the opening you can see no chromatic aberration, lightning and precise focus, blurry and detachment of the really beautiful plans. Balanced size and weight, feeling of solidity at the highest levels. It's a work of art to me. sent on March 08, 2021 |
 | Sony FE 24-105mm f/4 G OSS Pros: Build quality, image quality, fast and quiet AF. Cons: Nobody Opinion: I recently bought this lens to have an all-round lens to use during the "photo walks", it surprised me positively for the overall quality. Excellent sharpness for a 24-105 zoom, fast and precise AF, the bokeh is pleasant, stabilization ok, good flare hold. Overall I am more than satisfied. sent on March 06, 2021 |
 | Canon EF 16-35mm f/2.8 L USM II Pros: Brightness. Cons: Distortion, poor sharpness at the edges and price. Opinion: L 'I sold x take the new 16-35 f4 Is usm, already says it all. Good yield in the center but the edges between low distortion and sharpness really disappointed me. Compared with the 16 -35 f4 usm Is not deserve even the red stripe of the optical professional. Purchased at 1600 € just sold out at 850 €, so what put € 750 just to deliberarmene. sent on August 09, 2014 |
 | Canon EF 24-70mm f/2.8 L USM II Pros: sharpness, weight, making kelp Cons: price and a slight barrel distortion in the 24 focal Opinion: I just bought and I still have to perform many tests, but a test of clarity I did today. I compared this lens with the Canon 24-105 and Sigma 24-70 (old non-stabilized). From the tests showed a dominance of sharpness especially the focal length of the new 24-70 24. In practice, a 24 mm quality at the center is better but not striking, however the edges the quality is outstanding, it is not even comparable to the other two lenses. As you climb the focal difference in quality is decreasing but is always higher than the other two. For the rest (barrel, weight, handling, nuts, focus, vignetting) I must say that is a very high level of quality. sent on October 03, 2012 |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
