RCE Foto






Login LogoutJoin JuzaPhoto!
JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).

By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you have read your options regarding cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.


OK, I confirm


You can change in every moment your cookies preferences from the page Cookie Preferences, that can be reached from every page of the website with the link that you find at the bottom of the page; you can also set your preferences directly here

Accept CookiesCustomizeRefuse Cookies

Canon EF 16-35mm f/2.8 L USM II : Specifications and Opinions




Canon EF 16-35mm f/2.8 L USM IICanon EF 16-35mm f/2.8 L USM II

Canon EF 16-35mm f/2.8 L USM II

Canon EF 16-35mm f/2.8 L USM II



The Canon EF 16-35mm f/2.8 L USM II is a wide-angle lens for FF and APS-C, manufactured from 2007 to 2016 (discontinued). The focus is done by Ultrasonic AF Motor (Ring-USM), it does not have image stabilization. The average price was 1419 €;
103 users have given it an average vote of 8.6 out of 10.


If you have used this item, you can add your vote:  

MOUNT

This lens is available with the following mounts:

Canon EF: this lens is compatible with reflex fullframe and APS-C Canon EF.



SpecificationsReviewsCompareBuySample Photos





 Specifications
 Focal lenght   16-35 mm
 Angle of view   107.1 - 63.5°
 Format   FF, APS-C
 Max. aperture   f/2.8
 Aperture blades   7
 Lenses/Groups   16 elements in 12 groups
 Min. focus distance   0.28 meters
 Reproduction ratio   0.22x

 Features
 Zoom type   Ring, interal
 Stabilization   No
 Focus   Ultrasonic AF Motor (Ring-USM)
 Internal Focus   Yes

 Built and notes
 Tripod ring   No
 Extenders   No
 Filters   82 mm
 Lens hood   Yes, supplied
 Weather sealing   Yes
 Weight   635 g
 Dimensions   89 x 112 mm

 Buy

Canon EF 16-35mm f/2.8 L USM II, buy on Ebay Ebay

  JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.

RCE Foto

Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info)


Reviews



What do you think about this lens?


Do you want add your opinion? You do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!

There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments, join discussions and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 258000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.





Google Translate  The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.


avatarjunior
sent on February 03, 2026

Pros: Focal range, f/2.8 aperture, "vintage" rendering, superb colors

Cons: edges and distortion at 16mm and with aperture wide open but when you know you adjust accordingly ...

Opinion: ?I state that I love the vintage result, these lenses are far from today's "perfection" but they have a soul that makes the difference for me! Bought used with some small uncertainty (reading the reviews here on Juza), this lens pleasantly surprised me for the rendering, colors and detachment of the subject, (I also own the 35 f1.4 I series; fabulous!) but above all the focal range makes it ideal for most of the situations I face! For effective use, its characteristics must certainly be understood but after that it gives amazing shots. I would never part with it!

avatarjunior
sent on February 28, 2025

Pros: Creative possibilities in any context, maximum and constant aperture at f/2.8

Cons: for the use I make of it, absolutely none

Opinion: Taken used (and definitely lived) for less than 300 euros, for the use I make of it in the field of sports reportage and concerts I put it without hesitation in the kit instead of the Tamron 15-30 I had previously in order to have all three f/2.8 zooms of the same brand and therefore more homogeneity within the same reportage. And it is precisely the aperture, when working indoors and with artificial lights, that is its trump card that made me prefer it to the f/4 version which - from what I read - is better in terms of sharpness especially at the edges. In any case, the lack of sharpness at the edges is not an insurmountable problem for me. The particular focal range allows you to explore many solutions and shooting points, perfect especially for panoramas and context photos of events or concerts. Summing up, also thanks to the price at which I found it, a widely promoted lens and that, personally, I would buy again instead of version III if the copy in my possession were to say goodbye to me.

avatarsupporter
sent on August 27, 2019

Pros: Bright, f2.8 row resistance and tropicalization

Cons: Size

Opinion: Of this lens I have heard of each: it is pasty is inaccurate distorts a lot, the brother f4 is much better... etc. I have had it and loved it for many years for the following reasons: I love industrial photography and therefore I have often found myself shooting in the dark, I love the landscape and I love the Street, especially at night. I tried brother is f4, beautiful lens for charity, but it was not for me, sharp almost to be cold stabilized very well, but f2.8 are f2.8. I never regretted the absence of the stabilizer, indeed in the landscapes I always mounted the filter nd. In the night street from the best, of course it must be used as any 16-35, it is not a 35 tip and snaps... the leaks of the lines are obvious and if you can't keep the car in axis the result is merciless... but if you study and learn the rules, that lens is a joy. I think this is a lens not for newtors, buy the 17-40 or the f4 and you will have more fun! But if you want a true backlight rose you can't ask for better, in fact you... going on its version 3 or on Zeiss. Used must buy.

avatarsenior
sent on January 18, 2017

Pros: L series, weather sealed, f 2.8

Cons: .....Nothing for now.

Opinion: Lens taken in lieu of the same focal length, but version f4 usm is ii.rnHo did an exchange with a member of the forum, he was looking for a wide angle and I is a bright wide angle .... rnrnPrime impressions: rnrnEsteticamente the optic has an imposing front lens (filter 82mm) making it firm and stable grip the lens giving you a sense of sicurezza.rnRifiniture L. Curated series and well finished, although the project is now the 2007.rnrnPer regarding the yield, both of 6d 80d that are currently satisfied. rnL'apertura f 2.8 makes file is good for night use as indoors or outdoors and does not feel the lack of stabilizer. rnGlobalmente I have not seen it with photos edges too mixed or unclear let alone bui.rnCerto to 16 mm c is a slight vignetting but not ecessiva, as a slight ghosting if you point directly to a light source, it is the sun or a artificiale.rnrnSoddisfatto light. rnrn rnrnrnrnrnrnrnrnrn

avatarjunior
sent on December 28, 2015

Pros: Focal range and aperture 2.8

Cons: Total yield, poor sharpness especially at the edges, not af precise.

Opinion: I think it is, in my opinion, among the worst Canon lenses. To be a wide optical flaw in many important aspects mainly on clarity and consistency of the same clarity on the frame. Perhaps retains a certain decency in photojournalism, but otherwise in my opinion not worth what it costs. I hope for a version III arranged for the type of optics is very interesting!




Photos taken with Canon EF 16-35mm f/2.8 L USM II

Foto
Clouds, the Milky Way and Aurora Borealis, 016499
by Juza
114 comments, 59838 views
Foto
Sunrise and sunset
by Juza
101 comments, 43158 views
Foto
I do not play more .. burma
by Alessandro Bergamini
193 comments, 43067 views  [editors pick]
Foto
Untitled Photo
by Mayda
121 comments, 27746 views  [editors pick]
Foto
Ice and fire
by Juza
61 comments, 23326 views
Foto
You come in?
by Anthony Pappone
125 comments, 36446 views  [editors pick]
Foto
Electrauto in the Serengeti
by Fabio Maccagno
139 comments, 21361 views
Foto
Aurora Grundarfjordur
by Juza
79 comments, 25456 views


RCE

Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info)
Foto
Aurora Borealis of 01/12/2014
by Juza
92 comments, 22894 views
Foto
Pull Me Under
by Mauro Tronto
92 comments, 14738 views  [editors pick]
Foto
Antelope Canyon
by Diego-v-73
189 comments, 33987 views  [editors pick]
Foto
Sunrise reflected, 016,422
by Juza
86 comments, 25749 views
Foto
Welcome property
by Erik Colombo Photographer
96 comments, 7193 views  [editors pick]  
HI RES 37.7 MP

Foto
Kirkjufell reflection
by Juza
68 comments, 18368 views
Foto
Full Moon
by Sistuccio
115 comments, 23251 views
Foto
Stockness dawn
by Juza
39 comments, 15847 views
Foto
Pian di Spagna Nature Reserve and Lake Mezzola
by Alessio Giovacchini
105 comments, 5818 views  [editors pick]
Foto
An icy world
by Juza
44 comments, 13870 views
Foto
One Vision
by Tommy
86 comments, 13856 views  [editors pick]
Foto
Escape routes ...
by Shiko
166 comments, 25628 views  [editors pick]
Foto
The flood of the Po
by Nangi
114 comments, 7268 views  
HI RES 5.4 MP

Foto
Sunset frozen
by Juza
56 comments, 14753 views
Foto
St. Mark's Square Basin
by Sabbion
48 comments, 7582 views  [editors pick]  
HI RES 10.7 MP

Foto
Down there among the flowers
by Jessy68
208 comments, 19741 views  
HI RES 3.8 MP

Foto
Mirrors
by Alessio Giovacchini
71 comments, 2963 views  [editors pick]
Foto
The larch
by Sistuccio
84 comments, 17292 views
Foto
Aurora Borealis, Norway, 2013, 016 374
by Juza
72 comments, 41059 views
Foto
Pale di S.Martino
by Stearm
194 comments, 6255 views  
HI RES 17.4 MP

Foto
The artist of the painting
by Anthony Pappone
63 comments, 20053 views  [editors pick]
Foto
Spirals in the sky
by Juza
34 comments, 14115 views
Foto
Dubai view from above
by Filtro
97 comments, 20073 views  [editors pick]


RCE

Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info)
Foto
Kirkjufell
by Nico5150
86 comments, 7360 views
Foto
Alba Vik, Iceland
by Juza
36 comments, 11996 views
Foto
Mesa Arch
by Shiko
105 comments, 16932 views  [editors pick]
Foto
The Avenue of Sunset
by Stearm
169 comments, 6328 views  
HI RES 13.0 MP

Foto
7 Seconds Away
by Mauro Tronto
51 comments, 5826 views
Foto
The magic of the dawn
by Juza
41 comments, 12210 views

Next Page »




The sample photos are selected automatically between all photos posted by JuzaPhoto members, using the camera and the lens selected in the techs. If you find evident errors (e.g. photos taken with cameras and lenses that are not available yet), you can contribute to improve the page by sending a private message to the user that has entered incorrect values in the photo caption.




 ^

JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.

Mobile Version - juza.ea@gmail.com - Terms of use and Privacy - Cookie Preferences - P. IVA 01501900334 - REA 167997- PEC juzaphoto@pec.it

May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me