|
| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
Beldigilberto www.juzaphoto.com/p/Beldigilberto  |
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator. | Nikon AF-S 300mm f/4 E PF ED VR Pros: Legero, quiet, clear, accurate, functional, PF, VR. Cons: Cost, no Opinion: I would like to give you my impressions and a brief review of this light, new innovative and feature-rich than the old and glorious version of 300 f4, which gave me much satisfaction and freezing good moments; although recently I have this lens and I would leave my impressions and comment. The idea that made me upgrade the lens 300 f4 to the new version is its lightness and VR newly designed, with a very fast internal motor and quiet (it really so ..) I thought to pair the D750 and D300s (waiting new pro DX model) to get a lighter lens, fast, quiet and easy to handle without neglecting the quality, planning to use it for bird hikes, with the possible addition of TC1.4 III and reaching a maximum TC1.7II (765mm f5.6 ) with excellent light and compact results; considering the TC2 III who was also compatible but much slower with significant loss of image clarity and quality. For this light weight it is easier and more practical this lens,added with the VR sports the lens gives precise, sharp images at low ISO and using low times for those who make naturalistic pictures will be very happy with this, since they will no longer need to worry about using a monopod or tripod to stabilize the lens . The Nikkor 300mm f / 4E VR is really small so to speak is very similar to the 24-70 f2.8, it seems a no-brainer for anyone looking to buy a high-quality first-level telephoto without spending a lot of money, it could be a great traveling companion, for sports and for wildlife, for walks in the mountains, very good for a female audience, wherever and whoever lost is a problem. I used this lens with the camera heads (D300s, D7200, D750, D3s) good results with all the best with the D750 and D3s; with smooth D750 is really lightning a blade, a great detail, it can also focuse in the branches (without claiming the moon), but compared with a 400 f2.8 + D810 would say that you really defends very well.I even made some shots with a fully compatible D810, the file is very similar to the D750, being very clear and precise you can very well make good Croop> 50% always consistent with the noise and high ISO. My concerns for this lens have been reading the many youth issues why I waited a bit before purchasing .. someone claimed to decentralization issues, compatibility issues with certain camera bodies, problems with VR, AF problems, Luckily my perspective everything looks ok so far? Finally I am very happy with this lens, now we await the results of the tests and the first shots of the D500 would be a great KIT on paper. sent on January 29, 2016 |
 | Nikon AF-S 500mm f/4 D ED II Pros: Sharpness, size, weight, lack of VR, balancing brightness. Cons: Availability, cost, long hood. Opinion: An optical by excellent quality and undisputed, many say it is one of the best optical Nikon created as super telephoto lens, even sharper optics that happens to this only implemented the VR; in my opinion the perfect optical fauna. Excellent with the Nikon TC-1.4 II home does not feel and do not see any difference, I would say great reeds with TC-II 1.7, and instead lose sharpness and speed as AF, but always good result (for a focal length of 1000 be content) .rnMentre negative is with the new TC-1.4 III Nikon, the latter does not work with this version is tested with the D3s that with the D750 (I'll do some research and some more proof) .rnDalle my tests field so far I can tell you that with this in mind I get better results with the D3s that D750.rnCon with this view does not feel the lack of VR, above 1/2000 all is well even freehand there are problems, very balanced and fairly compact, stand on this point is a regina.rnVi I can say it hereIt is nowhere to be found and if you find it also costs much used but the yield is very good, if you are seeking long perspective and with a good yield is for you. rn sent on July 11, 2015 |
 | Nikon AF-S 105mm f/2.8 G ED VR Micro Pros: Fantastic sharpness, focus, lightning, good VR, quality / price. Cons: Dimensions, Weight Opinion: I state that before making my choice I asked a lot of opinions and views, I did some tests and comparisons between these viewpoints: (-Nikon AF-S 105mm f/2.8 G ED VR Nikon AF Micro-200mm f / 4 D IF ED Micro Sigma 150mm f/2.8 EX DG OS HSM Macro), but then I chose Nikon AF-S 105mm; When I had to buy the lens I was in possession of a D7000 where its optical field of the lens is equivalent to 157 millimeters and not little, comparing other lenses Nikon AF 200mm and 150mm Sigma seemed too long and difficult, (more field you + is difficult to manage) and lens quality as they were all excellent and everyone I spoke bene.rnLa resolution of the Nikkor 105 is fantastic already fully open both the center and the edges, the best performance is achieved with the opening between f / 4 and f/5.6, this macro lens is virtually free of distortion and vignetting is almost nothing this' optical presented the lens (Nano Crystal) treatment that eliminates internal lens riflessi.rnLa mechanical quality and aesthetics externalof the lens is very good, objective is rather fat and heavy due to the VRII and internal focusing, for all of these aspects is considered a lens PRO.rnSe compare quality / price I would say that this perspective is well mercato.rnOra coupled with the D300s is an outstanding optics, I'm really happy with my purchase, and the consiglio.rn sent on March 12, 2014 |
 | Nikon AF-S 16-35mm f/4 G ED VR Pros: Sharpness, VR, money, possibility to use filters. Cons: Game focus ring, size in length, high distortion at 16mm on FX but sistemabile in PP. Opinion: On my D7000 I really made a lot of shots, even in parallel on the D700, and I can only speak bene.rnL'obiettivo Nikkor AF-S DX 16-35 VR format, is an excellent wide-angle to normal zoom (actually a 24-52 ) showing a good, excellent and very good resolution in the center at the edge / corner, f5.6? f8? f11 will get the best risultati.rnLa distortion is well under control, the same is true for vignetting and aberration cromatica.rnLa build quality is excellent and in line with other professional goals Nikkor, because this perspective is already considered PRO, f4 whole zummata. rnSecondo me how sharp the corners -35mm the Nikon 16 f / 4 is better than the Nikon 17 -35mm f / 2.8 and the fantastic Nikon 24 -70mm f / 2.8, in most mounts a VR that works very well in low-light situations, and the lightness of the Nikon 16 -35 places him as my best wide-angle FX.rnUn Another quality that I think the reward is the ability to mount the filters, unlike the Nikon 14-24the lens has an almost flat front lens and the ability to mount a filter of 77 mm, thanks to a system of focusing interna.rnNon is an optical defect-free, in FX format distortion is quite heavy to 16 mm at the end of the lens produces a bit of vignetting, nothing that can not be removed later in PP, less evident in the format DX.rnSul my Nikon 16 -35 I noticed that the ring of focus shows a little 'game not in focus, but in the ring for the focus, when you rotate the dial to the focus, it takes a couple of millimeters of movement until the unit of focus actually follows the ring focus; this can be annoying when trying to focus manually or in fact shooting with Live View.rnMa I can also advise that if you use it only on the DX format, however, the 16-35 has a rival for me very good optical Nikkor AF- S DX VR 16-85; even if it has a little distortion and vignetting, offers focal range much larger than the16-35 excellent sharpness, lighter, less bulky and has a price considerably inferiore.rnIn any case, the AF-S Nikkor 16-35 f4 VR, is an optical consiglio.rn sent on March 10, 2014 |
 | Nikon D300s Pros: Solidity, Autofocus, Auto Meter, Tropicalized, gusts. Cons: High ISO over 1600. Opinion: For months I searched for information on this camera, I had to change my second camera body of the D7000 and I was considering the new D7100 camera body and the old but consolidated D300s PRO. I've tried both bodies, in various situations, but the one who gave me the most satisfaction is the D300s, for various reasons, primarily the camera body, buttons, ergonomics, rapid and precise AF in particular its files. It is true the D7100 has very detailed files, and optical PRO (before the need to calibrate the camera body) by stunning results but would recommend it to those who do landscapes mounted on the tripod is a queen, while for sports use, dynamic, fauna the D300s is still spectacular, gives fail with good detail and with PRO lenses from a certain creaminess and the absence of noise, even in low light up to ISO 1600 the noise is absent, to ISO 2000 are acceptable, no more than you have to have special demands. As a second body DX I'm really happy with my choice. sent on December 23, 2013 |
 | Nikon TC-20E III Pros: Very good as TC, though not comparable to excellence TC 1.4. Cons: Negative points in my expensive and slow to AF. Opinion: Who wants and want a powerful telephoto without spending too much this is really a good solution; improved from the old version in all aspects especially the sharpness, very fast and accurate AF mounted with the Nikon AF-S 70-200 VR II works really well, except in the Nikon AF-S VR MICRO 105 has all the features but AF is a bit slow. When photographing distant subjects, such as wildlife, birds Nikon TC-20E III is a valuable tool that will allow you to photograph the subject without getting close and disturb them, giving you a lot of satisfaction. sent on August 26, 2013 |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
