|
| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
Roby02091987 www.juzaphoto.com/p/Roby02091987  |
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator. | Nikon 20-35mm f/2.8 D IF Pros: Excellent construction, very useful range of focal lengths, excellent quality Cons: Soft edges to TA, a minimum focus distance of high hood found. Opinion: I have just this lens, but already I love it. I took it for two days in the mountains with my Nikon FE and I pretty much just used this lens. Useful range of focal lengths, truly a handyman for reportage: from wide-angle driven (20mm) to 35mm, the classic. Abbinateci a 85/105/135 (depending on your taste) and you will not need other lenses! RNLA building is a delightful old-style (nikon thing that has been lost, unfortunately): all metal (except dial aperture and switch AF / MF) solid feel absolute nuts with fluid and precise, a real pleasure to usare.rnSenza hood suffers a little 'flare and slight loss of contrast when the sun is just out of frame, so if you do not have the' original (unavailable), you'll get it third parti.rnMonta 77mm filters: easy to find, cheaper than 82mm, nothing special solutions and ultracostose (see 14-24) .rnAngoli a bit 'soft at room temperature, but when you need it (especially landscape) just close the aperture to have them back his nitidi.rnIlonly real flaw is the minimum focus distance of 50 cm compared with 25-30 cm of the optics are a bit like the current 'Tantini ... but it is a defect which, imho, you can safely soprassedere.rnrnIo are able to take it home with € 120 with its caps and the original hardshell case (alas, without a hood, which I purchased from a third party): value to the stars. sent on September 15, 2014 |
 | Tamron 200-400mm f/5.6 AF LD IF Pros: Economic, up to 300mm the quality is good, and is only decent. Hood enormous, almost long as the lens. Cons: A lot of purple fringing, especially at 400mm. AF and precise manual focus difficoltoso.rn Opinion: All in all decent lens, allows you to get to 400mm without sacrificing the brightness (f/5.6) and a quality not to be thrown away. Over 300mm, however, it is recommended to close the diaframma.rnPurtroppo a little purple fringing is an almost constant presence, even in low light not so difficult and this undermines a lot of the final quality scatto.rnL 'autofocus (at least on my copy) was never very accurate, especially at 400mm, and I was often forced to resort to MF.rnIl MF is not easy, due to the small ring and the short stroke (well, you have to be there to sip the mm). rnLo advice if you want to try using a telephoto lens without spending much (I think you can find it at 150 €), but keep in mind that very soon there will be tight and will look for something better. sent on March 06, 2013 |
 | Nikon AF-S 300mm f/4 D ED Pros: Outstanding optical quality since TA, constructed entirely of metal, AF highly accurate and fast enough if kept restricted from 3m to infinity, focheggia up to 1.45 m, approachable price. Cons: Improved tripod bracket, no VR Opinion: An excellent lens for photo hunting, imho clearly to be preferred '80-400vr.rnNon is close: quality is already at the top to f / 4, the only reason is to recover heat pump diaphragm, even with a lot of attack (tested with kenko 1.4 x 300 DGX). rnAutofocus thunderbolt of war such as glass professional, but limiting it to 3m is still very fast and tracks smoothly even animals movimento.rnUsando throughout the excursion, however, in the case of hunting becomes quite slow because there is still "a long way" between infinite and 1.45 m. If you do not need the 1.45 m, I highly recommend using the blocco.rnLa construction is great, it is all metal (almost improper weapon), the ring and the switches are in position to reach instinctively and always under control, the built-in hood is very comfortable and very well fatto.rnrnLa tripod bracket introduces vibration shutter speeds between 1/40 and 1'' if you do not use the presollevamento mirror. For me it's more of ano problem, since for times so slow (for a 300mm) I would have used the presollevamento. The fact remains that there is a problem progettuale.rnrnNon I would suck a minimum of tropicalization and a glass in the back to protect the diaframma.rnrnHo had the opportunity to compare it with the 300 f/2.8 VR2 and frankly I did not see all this difference in optical quality, the 300ino defended himself just fine (compared to TA vs shots. TA). Where he is clearly lost in the speed of focus, there was nothing to them: as the f / 4 is pretty fast, 300one is practically istantaneo.rnrnSe had the VR (also first generation) would be almost perfect. sent on January 30, 2013 |
 | Kenko Pro 300 DGX 1.4x Pros: Cheaper than the originals (paid 150 €), good construction, compatible with a lot of optics, excellent optical quality, no compromise on speed precision AF, EXIF ??data successfully transmitted. Cons: I have not yet found Opinion: I got to use it on D90 with 300 f / 4 AFS (since the original is too expensive for me and is not used) and can not seem to get it, it was not for the fact that the maximum aperture is f/5.6 and no longer f/4.rnL 'f is precise and responsive as ever, even in low light, the EXIF ??data is transmitted to perfection, the optical quality has not been sensitive to even worse comparing two crop at 100%, no trace of aberrations cromatiche.rnProvato also on the 105 f / 4 with excellent micro risultati.rnHo focheggia found that without too much trouble even at f / 8, f/5.6 lens trying it with the one that I possess the 18-105 vr nikon@105mm.rnUn 'good product, would recommend to my eyes closed to all those who are unwilling to spend € 400 for tc14e original or have optics that are not compatible with this multiplier. sent on January 30, 2013 |
 | Nikon AF 28mm f/2.8 D Pros: Very small and lightweight, good construction (although plastic), already good yield from TA. Of aps is an excellent fixed-rounder. Minimum focus to fifteen cm from the front. Cons: Distortion and vignetting a little 'marked for a fixed amount of this kind, but hardly noticeable in the common use of aps. AF PTO, the entry is manual focus. F/2.8 is bright enough, but on occasion I would not have disdained an f / 2. Opinion: I state that the use of D90.rnUna lens to have in your pocket: weighs nothing, takes up even less space, but at the same time has an incredible flexibility of use for a drive, you do everything (well, almost). RNLA AF-D version is very good optically (6 lenses in 6 groups), while the AF version (without the D) seems to be significantly worse (5 lenses 5 groups). rnL'autofocus screw I found it quite fast, reliable, if it has to do from 0.25 cm to infinity is not exactly lightning on D90, but in real situations of use his speed has always been more than enough. sent on October 29, 2012 |
 | Samyang 8mm f/3.5 Fisheye Pros: Economic, excellent construction (all metal), focus ring smooth, well balanced and no play, excellent optical quality, both in relation to the price both in absolute terms. Distortion more pleasant and less extreme than other fisheye lenses, especially in the corners. Excellent resistance to flare and ghost. Cons: At full aperture is a bit 'soft, especially at the corners and has some chromatic aberration. Closing a bit 'definition achieves excellent levels and AC are reduced. The version without chip does not allow the operation of the exposure of some reflex nikon. The aperture ring has openings widely spaced (click to 1 stop) and you pass f/3.5 to f/5.6. There is no minimum f/4.rnDistanza focus quite high: 30 cm from the floor sensor and well 15 cm (approximately) from the lens front ... a little 'Tantini counting that other fish focheggiano to 1-3 cm from the front. Opinion: Good fisheye lens for a very low price, on second is 200 € without any problem and you sell at the same price. Great if you want to try shooting with this kind of lens without svenarsi.rnLa peculiar projection (only as far as I know) makes the distortion very pleasant and not so extreme, while maintaining the angle of view of 180 °. RNLA version chip (especially useful to nikonisti like me) it costs a lot more than the "smooth", but with a minimum amount of manual hand you can add the chip (23 € cost) and use it like any other lens with electronic contacts, complete with exif completametne meter running, adjustable diaphragm third parties to stop all modes, etc. ecc.rnLa minimum focusing can lead to 3-4 cm from the front lens by simply removing a screw blocco.rnrnSe you are looking for a fisheye for aps, you can not consider this little gem. sent on October 29, 2012 |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
