|
| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
Dreampackers www.juzaphoto.com/p/Dreampackers  |
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator. | Nikon AF-S 20mm f/1.8 G ED Pros: Weight, diaphragm Cons: Price, construction a bit plasticose (but it is used to limit its weight) Opinion: I was undecided between the Sigma 1.4 and the Nikon 1.8 as it is a lens that I do not use much (I do not do landscapes) I preferred at least for once save me the weight, by tending that the more you go to the pushed wide angle (24----> 20-----> 16-----> 14 etc) less you notice the D Difference between open aperture as 1.4 and 1.8 (for street use or portraiture) the cost in my opinion is a bit ' altino as for all Nikon optics, but the quality and good. If I had accepted the weight of the Sigma I think I would have taken that, having already the 35 1.4 art, are the Ferrari of optics. sent on February 07, 2019 |
 | Sigma 35mm f/1.4 DG HSM Art Pros: Durable, color, 1.4 sharp Cons: Probable FB focus to be adjusted on some models of reflex Opinion: It is the optics that I prefer, because the 35 is the one that most resembles the human eye, it does not distort how the wide angles detach too much like the zooms. The diaphragm 1.4 is known to use, if you are close to the subject the field of MAF is minimized and you risk to have (always if the thing is not desired) in focus only a small portion of the subject. If instead you are going to 1.4 with distant subjects the thing of note less obviously. The colors are superb and ad 1.4 is really really incisive, the only flaw is to hope that the shot focuses exactly on the subject (sometimes the MAF on the eye can for the most disparate reasons, end up nose or cheek) is an optics that should have all , I adore the fixed and I have done whole matrimonial services (both photos and videos) without ever replacing it, moving me back and forth to the subjects. sent on February 07, 2019 |
 | Nikon D750 Pros: High ISO, durable body, Price (updated to 2019) Cons: 4k lack, only 1080 60fps, unstabilized sensor Opinion: Now I have it for 3 years abundant and I used it from travel photography, the wedding to the basketball series, with optics ranging from 20 mm Nikon to 70-200 2.8 The machine is excellent, especially if to date (February 2019) one must buy the price is on 1200/1300 euros (import ). I also use it as a videomaker and it turns out to be a good machine. Obviously on a Pesa gimball (it would be better a ml with read lenses per ml) It is also not stabilized and the FPS only go to 60 (1080p) I thought and I always think of keeping it as a second body and switching to Nikon Z6 as prime (or Sony A7III) , they would give me a big hand in the video and in the weights. But it must be said that as photo quality probably the only true PRO would be represented by a greater number of focus points minimizing the resampling (using only the selector to choose the MAF also on the side parts of the sensor). For weights is to say that the d750 weighs little, 800 gr, one ML (Sony A7III, Z6) Maybe they are a 100 grams less. What changes are the optics (a 24-70 DSLR is almost 1 kg, per ml about half) The problem is the cost of remaking a kit (ml machine + optical ml), the absence of many dedicated optics and the total absence or almost of optical third-party ML , so I'd have to mount today's DSLR lenses with the addition of the adapter. I think, humor aside, I'll wait for the D760 and bear the weight and I'll invest the money in superb optics with the Sigma 85 art or the 105 art sent on February 07, 2019 |
 | Sirui T-005X Pros: lightweight, transportable in a backpack as a Eastpack price Cons: somewhat laborious assembly Opinion: is a great tripod, cheaper than the Manfrotto Gitzo rnl'unico neo ... I think it's the inconvenience when unscrewing the legs, I would have preferred for outlet / pliers to tighten chiudirninoltre open and life to reflex serves Allen (supplied) rnrnregge d7000 with Tamron 70-200, by tightening the Allen sooo strong, so it's almost limiternrnse there is even a slight breeze, the photos in the medium focal length out moves sent on October 21, 2015 |
 | Nikon D7000 Pros: price, weight, quality files Cons: held ISO, is ff, it tends to overexpose Opinion: the d7000 is a great camera, and frankly I do not know who to go to replace the D7100 D7200, if I have to change it step by ffrnla held ISO depends on the ambient light, if there is good lighting also ISO 1600/2000 keeps them perfectly, if you shooting in twilight or arenas different matter and grain is felt significantly (then if one takes pictures 13x15 or thereabouts, the thing you do not notice) rnl'af not sembre engages and forces to use live view (which I do not love ) rnper portraits travel I learned to keep to ev - 0.3 0.7 because the car tends to overexpose and files are like this, not very contrasted (lightroom adjusts all obviously) RNLA low resistance at high ISO, as for all DX affects when you try to open the shadows, they noise is heard quite rnnel is complex, and remains the top in the DX format .. I think if I will change 'will be with d750 sent on October 21, 2015 |
 | Tokina AT-X Pro 11-16mm f/2.8 DX II Pros: 2.8, no vignetting Cons: flare Opinion: is a lens that I took because I needed an angle, but I've never been too innamoratornforse I who am not a landscape painter, but trips I have always preferred the 35 fixed nikon, and that the use of contanto d7000rn11-16 equals about 16-24, maybe from my point of view better to take a good 24-70 Tamron VC or a fixed 24 (of FF) 1.8 or 1.4rnla lens itself is good, produces good photos, but to my way of photographing not suits, and now waits to be sold even if a porna reluctantly because the quality is very good sent on October 21, 2015 |
 | Tamron SP 70-200mm f/2.8 Di VC USD Pros: Price, 2.8, quality equal to nikon Cons: weight, not crystal clear 200 mm Opinion: cho is a lens I took because in addition to the photos in the travel report, use for Series A basket.rnin hall with d7000 (I dare not imagine a FF) does very well, better than the Nikon 80-200 and to equal or almost the nikon 70-200 vr 1 and 2rnla most 'uncomfortable is definitely the weight, especially on the road, I think I'll keep' just for the photo palazzetto.rne will opt for travel 'for a fixed sigma 85 1.4 rnbisogna get used to how that fitted with stabilizer, long focal species in DX require adequate time, because being underexposed rnnon recoverable facilmente.rnè very good for portraits where the subject is "agree", but if it is used for a "hit and run" is a bit uncomfortable, the best 35 or 85 fixed sent on October 21, 2015 |
 | Nikon AF-S DX 35mm f/1.8 G Pros: Price, lightness, nitidizza to TA Cons: plasticky, not always in 1.8 it is perfect (due to ambient light conditions or other) Opinion: is a good lens, at a great price, we shot for 2 year of d7000 and I pulled out my travel photos meravigliosernnei I matched the Tamron 70-200 VC but when I get home and settle shots, known as the most beautiful remains always rni close-ups made with 35 .. in the future if sparrow 'to FF probably I will change with a 35 Article 1.4 sigma, hoping to further improve sent on October 21, 2015 |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
