RCE Foto

(i) On JuzaPhoto, please disable adblockers (let's see why!)






Login LogoutJoin JuzaPhoto!
JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).

By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you have read your options regarding cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.


OK, I confirm


You can change in every moment your cookies preferences from the page Cookie Preferences, that can be reached from every page of the website with the link that you find at the bottom of the page; you can also set your preferences directly here

Accept CookiesCustomizeRefuse Cookies

Ironmember
www.juzaphoto.com/p/Ironmember



Reviews of cameras, lenses, tripods, heads and other accessories written by Ironmember


Microsoft Translator  The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator.

nikon_z50-250dxNikon Z DX 50-250mm f/4.5-6.3 VR

Pros: Relatively light, sharp, ultra-fast AF

Cons: minimum distance of maf (but you can not have everything ).

Opinion: A fantastic lens, detail, blurred, AF speed, low weight, for me rating 10. The minimum focusing distance forces you to take a few steps back when you are close to the subject, should they make a macro version I buy it immediately. It is made of plastic of excellent quality, Nikon never misses the shot in these cases. It has no adjustments on the barrel apart from zoom and focus, you can correct the maf even while the af is in operation as on the best full-time optics, I use it on a Zfc and I find it an ideal complement to the 16-50. It's amazing, it has a crazy stabilization, I took shots with very little light at 1/15 ° freehand perfect. I had much more expensive optics that didn't have the performance of this one.

sent on September 13, 2022


nikon_z16-50dxNikon Z DX 16-50mm f/3.5-6.3 VR

Pros: Sharpness, lightness, size.

Cons: maximum opening.

Opinion: Incredibly sharp at all focal lengths, superb at 50mm. despite the limited maximum aperture, detail at 50mm. like the best optics of Casa (guys I shot at a spider hanging from the drying rack putting myself at the minimum distance allowed, enlarging the shot you can see the hairs on the paws). Very smart: small and fast in focusing. If it had been a 16-80 instead of 16-50 it would not have been "a goal" but "The Goal".

sent on September 05, 2022


nikon_z16-50dxNikon Z DX 16-50mm f/3.5-6.3 VR

Pros: Sharpness, lightness, size.

Cons: maximum opening.

Opinion: Incredibly sharp at all focal lengths, superb at 50mm. despite the limited maximum aperture, detail at 50mm. like the best optics of Casa (guys I shot at a spider hanging from the drying rack putting myself at the minimum distance allowed, enlarging the shot you can see the hairs on the paws). Very smart: small and fast in focusing. If it had been a 16-80 instead of 16-50 it would not have been "a goal" but "The Goal". P.S. for those who denigrate non-metal attacks: first inquire about the type of plastic that is used, I point out that even on the Apollo Spacecraft and on the Shuttle there are plastic parts, just a brief search on the Internet to the Patents of some of these to change your mind.

sent on September 05, 2022


nikon_z_fcNikon Z fc

Pros: Layout controls, aesthetics, handling, performance, AF, articulated display, construction.

Cons: micro-display of the diaphragms not illuminated and poorly visible if not strongly illuminated, the user manual too *summarized* is almost superfluous if not useless (it must be said that online on the site there is the complete one with lots of hyperlinks but it is not downloadable, the downloadable one is identical to the paper).

Opinion: I come from a DSRL, I start immediately from what I think are shortcomings and then move on to the merits: the display of the diaphragms is not illuminated, it cost so much to put a LED ? in the evening it would have been VERY useful, lighting the keys would have been an additional plus but those in two days I learned by heart where they are and I use them without even looking at them, Nikon has arranged them in a *perfect* position. The screen could have a higher definition. It lacks a secure grip for the right hand: the grip that offers the right grip is available for separate purchase from both Home and third parties. Advantages: one would say *everything else*, beautiful, light (you spend the day without feeling the weight) and manageable, instinctive, buttons arranged in a scientific way (I find them better arranged than on the Z 50), having THREE rings to manage without taking your eye off the viewfinder times, apertures and over/ under exposure is the best, definitely a smart camera, easy to manage and with the addition of an accessory also to hold (I put a SmallRing that costs a lot less than the equivalent of Home), AF and WB amazing, incredible ISO seal, simplified ISO Auto management as on the D90 where you did not need three thousand parameters to set), detail of the photos at the level of the D500 and I do not exaggerate, very good Jpeg (with the correct management of Picture Control), burst in exceptional RAW, flash management (I have a Speedlight) from 5 stars. As I said in the pros and cons it lacks a "real user manual" (that of the D90 looked like a Bible, this is little more than a bigino) but you can easily learn to use it thanks to the perfect layout of the menus and functions. The camera contrary to what you may think is very well customizable (I'm talking about the function keys), it also allows the pre-view of the PDC by affixing the function to a key, which is no small thing since this function had now been relegated by NIKON only to Professional machines and had disappeared from the semi-pro (Note: true that on ML you can instantly see the effect of the adjustments we are going to do, but the control of the PDC mentioned before shows *better* how the photo will come, who makes macros can understand me better). Wi FI, BT and management from the Smartphone without any problem *but be careful that leaving the BT enabled the battery does not last anything*, disabling the two functions (the enabled only when needed) the autonomy is very good to be an ML. The lenses in the Kit are given without hood, with a few euros you buy them separately but it is right to know it to calculate the price of the shopping you are going to do to have a complete product. For me Vote 10 .

sent on September 02, 2022


tamron_17-50Tamron SP 17-50mm f/2.8 XR Di II LD

Pros: F/2.8 at all focal points, excellent in the backlight to the subject, precise AF, Excellent in portraits, good for all diaphragms, internal focus, compact.

Cons: Ghost in some landscape backlights, light chromatic aberrations on the yellow-red (easily eliminated in PP), is not full time and the manual fire must be selected only by the lens because the control from the Reflex does not release the engine, NOT tropicalized (lacks the rubber seal on the nozzle). Limited to 50mm.

Opinion: Taken because I wanted a light optics for all those occasions when the light is poor, good sharpness in standard conditions of use, superior to the other lenses in poor light conditions, really great for portraits, a little less for those landscape shots where you take with a ruthless backlight, light yellow-red chromatic aberrations easily corrected in PP, good even in closeups as long as you close the diaphragm. Precise AF (no front/back focus) and all in all fast. Soft (at least my specimen) at F 16, very good at F 8 / F9, surprisingly still good at F 32 (50mm.), right weight and compact size, excellent shots even without a lampshed whose use remains for me limited to occasions when it is necessary to protect the front lens from possible small shocks. Good texture, feeling of robustness, perfect tires, anti-stretch block on the barrel (for me it is not needed, the mechanism is well frictioned and there are no unwanted stretches, however there is and it is an added value). Stabilization is lacking but I do not miss it, made the colors really pleasant and - in my opinion - slightly warm. The "only fifty millimeters" limit you can hear, if Tamron were to do it 17-80 it would be a fantastic thing.

sent on February 02, 2021


tamron_16-300vcTamron 16-300mm f/3.5-6.3 Di II VC PZD Macro

Pros: Extraordinarily efficient, very sharp at all focal lengths, 300mm. It is better than many others, stabilization fabulous, smaller burden, 16mm. (When others stop to 18), also very good in the yield on Close Up, exceptional (5 stars) in the backlight and in difficult situations where other objectives had phenomena of ghost or flare or lack of definition, has the Full Time Manual Focusing (exceptional, if you try once a goal that has it then do you do more for less), has the window of distances, is weather sealed * * (and this is a parameter that eventually becomes indispensable).

Cons: almost no cons: wanting to be very picky maniacs and you can see that some focal lengths are not selectable and is selected just before or just after (such as trying to set 28mm or 85mm. or 105mm.) but honestly I do not find a limitation; The hood has a consistency that seems light but probably just an impression; the maximum focal may be seen at the edges of the frame some chromatic distortions that are still correctable in PP, but in any case the pictures in the center are exceptionally Crisp. basically I do not find defects.

Opinion: I've had a few days but I have already conquered and * * pleasantly surprised, I was afraid to find defects picture and instead I found a Sharpness sometimes impressive. Even in macro (would have to say "Close-Up") is doing very well, keep in mind that my basis for comparison is the Micro Nikkor 85mm. IF ED VR II I own for years and that -as you know- is almost a legend for its definition. the zooming ring has a significant friction that I like, there is no danger that you will shorten or lengthen if you strike something slightly (as it happened to me with the Nikkor 55-200). The MAF is * fast precise and quiet *. Five stars for the accuracy of MAF, as accurate as a surgical instrument. Price issue: here a note Mystery * how can a Target cost in UK (and only, do not send outside of the UK, I contacted the store, ed) € 470, via the Internet (from Germany) to 521 -: - € 570, and € 700 in store (in a shop) and"800 euro!" the second store contacted, how can it be that in Italy we have the things * * ALWAYS pay more? Not controversy, is * * portfolio, from 521 (best price Internet) to 800 (worst price Italy) are 279 € of difference are so many, too many, :( are 50% more! Why? Returning to the objective, the building looks solid and very well taken care of, we have the impression of having in his hands a lens Very high quality, I think it's a cut above (..but a beautiful span) to various 16-85, 18-55, 18 -105, 18-140, 18-200, 18-300, both Nikon Universal. Judgement: Good, very good. Some photos taken with this objective: http://www.juzaphoto.com/galleria. php? t = 1373202 & l = en

sent on April 15, 2015


nikon_d90Nikon D90

Pros: Ergonomics, ease of use, performance, detail of the photo (also with economic objectives), complete commands,

Cons: video industry just enough.

Opinion: * * A and castrate entry level, moreover, just a short ride on the web to see and compare photos. Dovendole give a vote, even after many years I'd give it yet "9".

sent on February 26, 2015


nikon_85vr_microNikon AF-S DX 85mm f/3.5 G ED VR Micro

Pros: Amazingly Sharp, Exceptional precision AF, Bright in Macro 1: 1 (other more expensive and seemingly bright macro lenses become darker when they arrive at 1: 1), lightweight, protected against water and dust! , Full time manual focusing, the absence of ghost and flare even when used against the ruthless.

Cons: designed to Dx (but you can use very well the same even on a FF with some tricks).

Opinion: I use it for years and it is almost a single body * * with my camera, I find it much better like that as average Tele Macro, has made a superlative, the colors are true, the detail is magnificent, the definition is at its best the optical circulation, use macro has a yield amazing, does not suffer from flare / ghost even in backlight boldest, shows some initial uncertainty in maf where does the parade back and forth before stopping and find the right spot (..but with a little help is resolved on the fly, plus the Full Time seems made) but once achieved is amazing accuracy, perfect, there are much more expensive lenses that are much more inaccurate. And 'light and not too bulky and another of the things that made me prefer is that in macro 1: 1 where the others (even House) that are f / 2 - f / 2.8 "close" to f / 5.6 This remains (if needed, and with appropriate choice) to f / 3.9, and if you please * * is a major advantage. The consiglierei? Yes 100%, plus costs MUCH less of the famous 105mm. Micro, and the results are no different, but ...

sent on February 24, 2015




 ^

JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.

Mobile Version - juza.ea@gmail.com - Terms of use and Privacy - Cookie Preferences - P. IVA 01501900334 - REA 167997- PEC juzaphoto@pec.it

May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me