|
| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
Matteobka www.juzaphoto.com/p/Matteobka  |
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator. | Canon EF 35mm f/1.4L USM Pros: Weight, blur, openness, handling and excellent wear rating. Cons: It is not tropicalized Opinion: I took this 35mm after a thousand doubts and perplexity. Reasoning and reflection on all useful reviews on the web. Are we joking!!!! There are those who hate 35 mm for charity ... But it's a show! You can not absolutely judge this lens with a grimace. Crazy. Certainly not easy to handle especially for the MAF that often moves by 1 cm and is likely to bring us home a job that is not perfectly focused. Put your hand away from the reflex. RnLarge colors, three-dimensionality, sharpness and blurry of fear.rnTo make street is upsetting even in the absence of light. It is not tropicalized (manned) but really to have in the kit. RnCredo is one of the lenses that impressed me most even though at first impressions I could not find a straight one. Then with a touch of PP you have impressive prints. Qualitatively sublime. sent on May 17, 2017 |
 | Canon 5D Mark III Pros: build quality, double coupon, top images, made at high ISO, burst Cons: Unremarkable Opinion: 10 votes for this machine I use for more than three years. The relationship with the 5D mark III usage grows in use. In the most difficult conditions still bakes wonderful files and never disappoints. Combined with the objectives of the caliber of 24-70 2.8 II USM and the 70-200 2.8 II USM is possible to work in every situation. Professional and versatile. Exceptional sent on April 29, 2016 |
 | Canon EF 24-70mm f/2.8 L USM II Pros: Construction, sharpness, contrast, brightness .... Cons: Price??? Opinion: Boys if all professionals in the world canon use this lens there is a reason !!!!! rnHo had a thousand doubts and concerns about the price, I admit. I tried the Tamron because it cost less and is stabilized. Great course. rnMa then you decide. You buy it, attach it to the camera and do not come off anymore! rnColori stratospheric. Pdr phenomenal. excellent autofocus accuracy and speed. rnInsomma if you want to save money ok ... But this is a different storiarn sent on April 25, 2016 |
 | Kenko Pro 300 DGX 2.0x Pros: Price, quality / strength Cons: tropicalization lack Opinion: I bought and used often with 5d mark III and 70-200 L is 2.8ii and 100 macro 2.8 L. I can not fault it. The ficus great car and the yield very good. In short, as mentioned in contrast, it is not tropicalization but its price is worth every penny and I do not think you could ask for more. I recommend it to everybody. sent on April 20, 2016 |
 | Canon EF 100mm f/2.8 L Macro IS USM Pros: L series, sharpness, tropilazzato, stabilized, crystal clear, macro Cons: The only drawback if you want to find the nit is the lack of tripod ring Opinion: super lens for quality and yield. Not only for macro photography, where it excels and it brings dedicated optics. Portraits with sensational details and faithful color. Great sfuocsto and focus. The Is not annoying noise as many say. Indeed luckily there! So L series in all respects. The price, then, makes it even more interesting is that you have in your kit. sent on April 12, 2016 |
 | Canon EF 70-200mm f/2.8 L IS II USM Pros: Divine. Brightness, versatility, durability and quality Cons: unobtainable Opinion: I bought this lens after many doubts and misgivings. Then, once decided, I spent the money in the best way possible (photographically speaking). I can not find fault with this view. It is spectacular in all light conditions, weather in embarrassing situations, in the studio, on the road, at sea, in the mountains, in the dark and the sun. Give magical portraits with a blurred "buttery" spectacular. The colors are real magic. The runaway stabilizer and the special set fire! Do not miss a shot. Do not suffer in backlit at dusk is a bomb. Obviously weighs a lot 'and is vistosissimo but .... The real problem is not having it! sent on April 12, 2016 |
 | Canon EF 24-105mm f/4 L IS USM Pros: L series, good stabilizer, excellent color rendering, perfect range for street and travel Cons: Flare, vignetting and f4. Opinion: 6 # 39; f16 loses in sharpness (at least my copy) on FF but still adds a great depth of field and detailed even at f11 / 14. If you want to do everything that will go along in almost all occasions It's perfect ...... sent on April 12, 2016 |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
