|
| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
Steve66 www.juzaphoto.com/p/Steve66  |
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator. | Canon EF 24-105mm f/4 L IS USM Pros: All Cons: Something ... but forgivable and sistemabile PP Opinion: And 'now gone out of production, I have taken another new version of 2015 before that they end, as the far more expensive (too expensive) new version does not have that advantageous quality / price. For focal lengths covering gives to a FF comfort of ourselves without carrying out more ... sometimes amazes giving you some pictures in which overcomes himself, without disfiguring even in the presence of fixed lenses, sometimes instead advises the limiti..da PP place ... but is concesso..a this legendary and unfailing handyman in dell'amatore kit, how often irreplaceable for a ceremonialist which must prefer the operating speed. Hurry up to take it ... or take it back .... rnrnrnrn sent on March 19, 2017 |
 | Tamron SP 70-200mm f/2.8 Di LD Pros: Quality / price ratio very good, clarity and optical performance of the highest quality, good construction Cons: MAF Slow Opinion: Who wants a 70-200 "class" without fainting, the Tamron is amazing for yield, its scope is ideal portraits and ceremonies, not for sport. If we speak only of the quality of the lens when the play (and leads too well) with the canon 70-200 2.8 L of the house with some embarrassment for the latter. Obviously the Tamron does not have the build quality and AF strongly in favor of Canon.rnSto glass costs around 600/650 euro new, even better if you can find used on the 450, you will make a Values! sent on March 03, 2013 |
 | Canon 7D Pros: Versatile, recent and complete technology, excellent image quality, screen, AF professional level, ergonomics, price. Cons: double slot, optical quality, it requires practice, it is not suitable for beginners. Opinion: Probably the best APS-C market, camera does not happen to everyone, but present in the various gallery has given ample demonstration of versatility and quality. Requires a minimum of knowledge and their skills back into play, in a certain sense the ages, more and more sluggish by the continuous technological evolution of digital has carried the loads to the delusions of "noise", yesterday there was a war of pixels, file now love planed to 25,000 ISO. The 7D optical likes solving, marked improvement over previous 40D/50D with regard to noise management, iso 1600 totally manageable and it is also the type of grain to be more pleasant than previous models, the 3200 hold up with good usability if you exposes a duty, not rare good examples of expertly managed iso file to 6400 (pre-and pp). rnAncora recently, it has a quality / price ratio between migliori.rn sent on February 20, 2013 |
 | Sigma 17-50mm f/2.8 EX DC OS HSM Pros: Sharpest already at room temperature and at all focal lengths, warm colors, contrast, light, excellent stabilizer 4-stops, Merry AF. Cons: maybe the price, slightly soft edges to 2.8, vignetting and distortion present at low focal but normal. Opinion: The new sigma goes to confront directly and with dignity with Canon 17-55 f 2.8, does not have the value / price of the Tamron 17-50, but, overall, is far superior. This sigma lends itself flawlessly for general use, I prefer it even to the canon because of the warmer colors. Already at f/2.8 is very sharp at the center, the softer the edges, but from f / 4 shoots a sharpness across the frame which I believe is unmatched in this ambito.rnForse little known even for reasons related to the price and competition, cost over 600 euro, and this puts it in a middle ground between the very expensive Canon, and Tamron.rnCome all sigma may have (more than other brands) problems f / b focus, so I would feel to recommend to owners of SLR equipped with adjustment for AF (micro) on board. sent on February 17, 2013 |
 | Canon 40D Pros: Semipro body, yet current technology, good processing jpeg, optimal resolution, raw wonderfully workable, reliable first body suitable for any occasion, a second body to never sell. Cons: absence microtaratura (though not essential as on current SLR superpixellate), screen poorly defined. Opinion: The canonists (among whom I am proud to belong) are always ready to strafe critical output of the last model, but then suffer morbidity retrospectives, they see the goodness of the bodies when they are out of production now, ready to mourn and / or nostalgic tone reassess the previous model. Consider the 40D body still present, controls the synthetic theory "necessary", and building materials in line with industry unlike the newborn the same category. A Good raw PP of the 40D is capable of churning out files that do not fear the comparison with Daria Glover aps-c present including the same degree of competition. sent on July 12, 2011 |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
