|
| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
Max468 www.juzaphoto.com/p/Max468  |
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator. | Canon 1D Mark III Pros: Ergonomics, burst, eternal battery tropicalization, sensor, dual slot, series 1 ....... Cons: 10 mp ... 4 5 or more megapixels could afford more crop ... outrageous Monitor. Opinion: Taken in place of 7d to tile to 6d from which hardly separerò.rnLa I first field trial has left me a bit puzzled. I shot, I looked at the monitor and I thought ... boh ..! RnRiscattavo a nice burst, watching the monitor and I thought I had made a good ca ... ta to sell 7d.rnPoi get home, drain the photos and I open with dpp falls ... I jaw !!!! perfect file ... ... razor sharp and perfectly exposed with saturated colors and very natural. digital noise at ISO 1600 clearly less invasive than that produced by 7. perfect details, making amazing fire ... and all with the Sigma 150-500 ... which is not exactly a must-have for nature photos goals. With 1d mk3 seems another lens ..! rnOra longer use and it makes me happy. The controls are all at your fingertips ... the body is a tank ... rnOra understand why when you exit cost as a kidney ..! 7d is a good car ... that's another planet !! however impractical the comparison with the files produced by 6d ... for the "vecchietta "are too far ahead ... sent on December 09, 2016 |
 | Canon EF-S 15-85mm f/3.5-5.6 IS USM Pros: Sharpness, focal range, stabilizer very effective, RELIABLE ALWAYS !! Cons: A little 'dark, not weather sealed. Opinion: A lens for amazing clarity and reliability. The use of 7d for about a year and each time I am surprised of the quality of files that can churn out. A real blade. I think that is higher than the 24-105 f4 L mounted on 6d. Do not shout to the scandal ... my main machine body is just the 6d with 24-105 L, (so I speak from experience and not hearsay), and it is not up to the younger brother. The images of 15-85 are more defined, have the most accurate colors, and are much less "soft" of the L series is a pity that it can not be used on full frame ... otherwise it would be my only standard zoom the focal. Vignetting acceptable and resolved without damage. A solid construction and free of annoying games of the rings, make this lens a must among the goals for aps-c. I have read many reviews, and from what I understand someone perhaps was less fortunate and suffered a copy than perfect and perhaps the same thing happened to me with the 24-105 ... sent on March 16, 2015 |
 | Canon 6D Pros: Yield at high iso, manageability, ease of use, value for money, precision and speed af. Cons: 1/4000 sec. max, and sd memory slot, 4 fps. Opinion: C files that churns are stunning. I still do a lot of confusion with the commands that are arranged in a completely different way from the 7d, and that some are only accessible from the menu and not from the buttons on the body, but also this whole lack of joystick for someone who is unforgivable, in my opinion does not create no problem (aside from the habit). Top marks ... especially for value for money. sent on March 12, 2015 |
 | Sigma 150-500mm f/5-6.3 DG OS HSM Pros: Stabilizer, af speed, good sharpness at all focal lengths, materials. Cons: The usual problem of Sigma ... suffers from front / back focus, a bit 'dark. Opinion: When I bought it I knew I did not have in my hands a tele professional, so my expectations were quite modest, particularly in the light of the reviews I letto.rnBe '.... I had to think again !! rnUna once calibrated mass focus on-camera and getting to grips with the lens, I am amazed of her speed and sharpness! The blurred obviously is not the best because of the maximum limited, but the subject is still isolated well. Maybe I was lucky, and I found a copy came out particularly well ... but I am very happy purchase. An unrivaled value for money. sent on February 01, 2015 |
 | Canon 7D Pros: Ergonomics, quality of the file under ISO 1600, burst from 8 fs, fast autofocus, endless customizable settings, external flash control. Cons: High ISO, dense sensor, requires quality optics. Opinion: 7Achille ...? Sure! It is a aps-c with a double sensor very dense! But a camera like that, if it were a full-frame, would cost much more than a 5d mark III. Straconsigliata. 9.5 rating. sent on January 15, 2015 |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
