|
| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
Giuseppe.Cristofalo www.juzaphoto.com/p/Giuseppe.Cristofalo  |
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator. | Genesis C1 KIT Pros: read review Cons: read review Opinion: A few months ago I reviewed the tripod in question, with which I found it to perfection. An excellent product from the exceptional Q / P ratio. Impeccable construction (leg orientation mechanism aside). Very beautiful also aesthetically. you can find all the detailed reviews and impressions of other users here: https://www.juzaphoto.com/topic2.php?l=en&t=2084942 sent on September 28, 2017 |
 | Zeiss Planar T* 50mm f/1.4 (C/Y) Pros: construction, aesthetics, fuzziness, sharpness already at TA, fluidity of the focus ring, resistance to flare, neutral and faithful colors, three-dimensionality. Cons: some chromatic aberration to TA in situations of strong contrast (easily corrected in PP), not having it. Opinion: One of the best goals I've ever had, definitely the 50mm Definitive. excellent already at TA, from f2 is a blade, has an embarrassing clarity.I did not expect much definition from a lens of the 90s on modern sensors.rnusarlo is very easy on the Sony a6000 thanks to the focus peaking, and will shortly adapt it on the canon 6D where I have already installed magic lantern, and I will update the review with my impressioni.rnSicuramente a goal for those who do not need an instant maf. sent on February 07, 2017 |
 | GoPro Hero 5 Pros: weight, dimensions, video quality, ability to shoot in RAW, waterproofing without homes, fisheye, wireless remote control for remote control or smartphone, stabilization via software, aesthetics, touchscreen, ergonomics, price. GOPRO AWARDS. Cons: do not have it (may be useful when you do not want to bring the SLR or mirrorless). touchscreen sometimes does not respond well to touch, batteries (at least 3 if you run videos). Opinion: 3A make a photo or video with gopro, gopro send them to the awards and if you like, awards you with discount coupons and and prize money) .rnper example I have taken new 300 euro, compared with 430 canons, because I had won a good account of 30% sending my foto.rnalcuni acquaintances have won several times prize money, $ 5.001 million barrels to premio.rnpotrebbe be a investimento.rn sent on January 27, 2017 |
 | Sony NEX 3 Pros: price of used, size, aesthetics, ease of use, image quality, burst, af good with bright optics, battery that does not discharge even after days of inactivity, good performance up to 1600 ISO, APSC sensor, 14 megapixel , screen, feeling of solidity, focus peaking. Cons: a few keys and dials, minimum ISO 200, not having it before, 14 megapixel, no crosshairs (if you buy it you know), tortuous menus Opinion: incredible performance of this small machine that enters everywhere.rni 14 megapixel can be a godsend to have clean image at low ISO, or can be uncomfortable if you tend to crop.rnused all my vintage optics is a pleasure with the focus peakingrnrn was the first ever sony mirrorless, and to date it is better in some respects than the various entry level nikon and canon.rnrnparlo from the owner of sony a6000 and canon 6D.rnvoto 9. sent on January 27, 2017 |
 | Canon EF 70-200mm f/4 L IS USM Pros: sharp at all apertures and at all focal lengths, effective stabilizer, low weight, excellent construction, weather sealed, autofocus, indispensable on ff, the price of new and used Cons: noisy stabilizer, lack tripod ring, WHITE, and thus not very discreet, not having Opinion: I love this lens, proven to canon day of Palermo, bought the day after taking advantage of a very good offer of Euronic and cashback canon 150 euro.rnL'obittivo is impeccable in all, can not fault it! Rni pros and cons found them up there ! rnlo stabilizer will be noisy, bulky hood, the color is not the most discreet, but looking at the pictures made with this gem makes you forget all these (do not call them that) difetti.rnHo coupled this objective at 16-35 f4 and an .stm 50cc and already I think my outfit is nearly complete. sent on June 16, 2016 |
 | Canon EF-S 18-135mm f/3.5-5.6 IS Pros: focal handyman excursion, good yield easily to 18mm with uncorrectable bias, light and stabilizzatorn Cons: usable only by f8 up, construction, clarity, dark, focus Unusual deco painful, collecting dust, opens by itself but we demand from a kit lens? Opinion: took time with canon 600D, was an excellent lens to start and understand what were the focal more congenial to my way of taking pictures! I rnquasi all the photos I made in 18mm, and some have even had important merits and have been awarded ! rnci but I want to say that this is only usable by f8 f9-up, because at smaller apertures is best to take pictures with a cellphone. sent on June 16, 2016 |
 | Canon EF 50mm f/1.8 II Pros: blur, brightness, price, weight Cons: plasticky materials, diaphragm closed the fuzzy shows pentagons of five blades, not sharp at TA, no hood Opinion: lens spectacular for the price, a must have, despite sopracitati.tra against the other things, has a low resistance to flare, but just buy a lens hood to solve the situazione.nulla inferior to his older brother, in my opinion;) although certainly a better building (at least a bayonet metal) would not hurt ... in each case has just come out on the market the clone youngnuo, which can compensate for many of the shortcomings of the original canon ... we shall see! rnih anyway lens fantastic and you always have on hand sent on February 08, 2015 |
 | Manfrotto Pixi Pros: compact, lightweight, quality Manfrotto, reach beyond the stated kg Cons: none at the moment Opinion: a tripod useful, only 13 cm long, that everyone should have. ridiculously low price for a small object that overwhelmingly take a permanent place in your equipment. I also use it as a handle for the video, and associated with a small lever to the focus, I can zoom and blur without shake excessively reflex.rntenuta perfect, the rubber feet I have yet detached! rnconsigliato absolutely sent on February 08, 2015 |
 | Mir-1b 37mm f/2.8 Pros: cost, multicoating, robust construction, nuts-smooth with preset aperture, bokeh, handyman on APSC. Cons: no one Opinion: I recently bought this lens with high expectations, which were not deluse.rnil multicoating does his duty, in any case it is easy to find a threaded lens hood. the construction is compact and rugged, the aim bright and sharp even at TA ... that is, a perfect lens from the ridiculously low price. course manual, but from performance incredibili.rnsfocati crazy and f11 perfect for landscapes sent on February 02, 2015 |
 | Zenit Helios 44M-6 58mm f/2.0 Pros: metal body, multicoating, bokeh, cost, sharpness at maximum aperture Cons: backlit little resistance, need hood. Opinion: great lens for portraits and street generally has all the flavor of the vintage despite being not so antica.rnil best compromise remains the Helios 44-3, features both multicoating (which are as specified, not sharply reduces flare ) that eight blades for the diaphragm ensures a breathtaking blur even at maggiorirnVoto openings 10 due to the value for exaggerated price. rnRisolvente also on modern digital sensors. sent on January 25, 2015 |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
